It’s not and won’t be.It’s Puma time.
It’s not and won’t be.It’s Puma time.
Ummm the passes aren’t exactly hitting receivers in the numbers….
There were easily between 6 and 8 passes that should or could have been caught that were flat out dropped, if not more.
Losing to Gardner-Webb would reinforce the notion that we don't belong.Sorry, faking it until you make it doesn't work in athletics. All we are doing when we play these body bag games is reinforcing the notion that we don't belong. Meanwhile Coastal Carolina improved to 3 - 0 today with a 12 point win over Buffalo. I'm sure their cult following of fans are giddy. They can sell wins to recruits, we can sell games that resemble the clubbing of a baby seal.
Yes, much rather go 0-fer against CUSA, MAC, Sun Belt, and lower than BiG, SEC, ACC...UConn is not doing anyone any favor scheduling teams like UMichigan which only causes its players and fans to be embarrassed on national television.
The UConn schedule should only include teams from C-USA, sub Belt, MAC and like lower competition play.
Please no more games against the Big 10, SEC, Big 12, ACC, and PAC until the football team gets competitive.
Wow. Too bad that wasn’t pointed out at the time.Yeah. Give them a goal to play for. This independent thing may not work out.
Yes, much rather go 0-fer against CUSA, MAC, Sun Belt, and lower than BiG, SEC, ACC...
I think that’s just the getting blown out in the big house hangover talking because that thought process is the slippery slope that leads to downgrading and then eventually dropping football. I remember fans and sports writers saying exactly the same thing when we joined the Big East and were struggling to even just make the BET. It was a bad idea then and it’s a bad idea now.Get lost with your silly nonsense. The idea is to play teams that have the same football finances as we do so the playing field is level, hopefully we can then gain some traction and turn this thing around like Temple did under Golden when they dropped down to the MAC.
You would rather we constantly try to run this football marathon uphill. It isn't working and its never going to work, and newsflash the fans don't like it. These games blow!
I think that’s just the getting blown out in the big house hangover talking because that thought process is the slippery slope that leads to downgrading and then eventually dropping football. I remember fans and sports writers saying exactly the same thing when we joined the Big East and were struggling to even just make the BET. It was a bad idea then and it’s a bad idea now.
I see improvement with this team and believe they are capable of winning some games later in the season. It took Golden multiple seasons to get to 500 and won 1 game first season.Get lost with your silly nonsense. The idea is to play teams that have the same football finances as we do so the playing field is level, hopefully we can then gain some traction and turn this thing around like Temple did under Golden when they dropped down to the MAC.
You would rather we constantly try to run this football marathon uphill. It isn't working and its never going to work, and newsflash the fans DON'T like it. We have played two games this year that were enjoyable to watch and neither were against P5 opponents.
I see improvement with this team and believe they are capable of winning some games later in the season. It took Golden multiple seasons to get to 500 and won 1 game first season.
UConn most certainly was not at the level of the rest of the Big East when it first joined. We struggled to compete. I’m not a fan of the “this is too hard, let’s try something easier“ school of thought as it pertains to athletics. deciding you can’t compete and limiting yourself to playing the bottom of FBS football only is a hairs breath away from the siding that that’s too hard and playing only FCS teams. That’s the mindset you’re proposing.How do you not understand the financial difference in this play for pay era? Basketball in the Big East was on the same level as the rest of the Big East, your basketball analogy is not a good one.
and BTW you mention "leads to downgrading", we downgraded football when we left the AAC (for sound basketball reasons, i'm not knocking the move), joining a G5 conference for football would be an upgrade. We already have a lot of G5 games on our schedule, making them conference games is an upgrade.
Yesterday sucked, we knew it was going to, but that’s no reason to metaphorically curl into the fetal position.
What game are you watching? Zion does ocassionally make a good throw but they are few and far between. He misses swing passes regularly. He rarely if ever completes a pass between the numbers. I am starting to wonder if he can see receivers in the center of the field. Before we blame the receivers, let's dependably get them the ball.They are hitting receivers I'm the hands. Ball touches hand means WR has to make the catch.
I respectfully disagree that we shouldn’t play P5 teams. Respectfully disagree that lowering the level of your competition is the path to becoming a better football team.Wrong. No one is proposing we curl into the fetal position. I want an upgrade. Independence is the bottom of the barrel, especially with the new playoff landscape, upgrade to a G5 conference for football. Any G5 conference I don't care. Look at what Liberty and Western Kentucky did yesterday.
Stop this delusional nonsense that playing more P5 games brings us closer to being a P5 team.
Georgia Tech is a P5. So is Colorado. And, of course BC. With a healthy team, those could/should be very entertaining games. With the current depleted squad, not so much, as quality depth is a major problem.Yes we have a chance against the G5 competition on our schedule. I agree. Thanks for proving my point, those games will be fun to watch. Why not play more G5 and less P5 and have more fun?
Wow. Too bad that wasn’t pointed out at the time.
I understand that the move to the Big East was both necessary and beneficial for basketball. That didn’t mean we needed to pretend it was good for football also.
I am glad that there is some reason on this board. Objectively speaking, 24 yards is 24 yards - seriously? To be clear, I would have been satisfied with him hitting 75% of those gimme passes and a couple nice attempts downfield. Instead it was kind of embarrassing to watch our offense sputter the way that it did.What game are you watching? Zion does ocassionally make a good throw but they are few and far between. He misses swing passes regularly. He rarely if ever completes a pass between the numbers. I am starting to wonder if he can see receivers in the center of the field. Before we blame the receivers, let's dependably get them the ball.
What game are you watching? Zion does ocassionally make a good throw but they are few and far between. He misses swing passes regularly. He rarely if ever completes a pass between the numbers. I am starting to wonder if he can see receivers in the center of the field. Before we blame the receivers, let's dependably get them the ball.
What game are you watching? Zion does ocassionally make a good throw but they are few and far between. He misses swing passes regularly. He rarely if ever completes a pass between the numbers. I am starting to wonder if he can see receivers in the center of the field. Before we blame the receivers, let's dependably get them the ball.
Ideally the MAC would be a great fit.
This appears to be the default reaction to avoid the question on Turner.I'm in awe of the reaction. Did we really think Mora was going to have us "competing" on the road against a playoff team in year 1? Defensively they forced some punts and got some sacks. Contrast that with the defenses we saw under the previous regime. Offensively the OL is the best group after the other units have been hit with heavy injuries. Keep hitting that portal and let's see if the offense can be developed from abominable to mediocre.