That's a pro-Pac-12 statement. I don't see that as alluding to the AAC at all.Yes it was. It was not in this interview it was a different interview same day.
Basketball: Stanford lands Mitty star Haley Jones
At the end Haley speaks to playing in Pac 12 and being challenged night in and night out.
Show me where I stated that was the main reason.I'm sure she had a myriad of reasons as to why chose Stanford, my point is that SOS was not the main one as donalddoowop stated.
As I said in other posts, I don't hear any anti-AAC sentiment there. That said, I'm sure coaches use whatever they have at their disposal to compete against UConn. The conference may be an issue, but I think Geno and CD can counter that so it doesn't stick. Haley was in a unique situation in that she lives near Stanford, has a long-term relationship with the staff, and could get past Stanford Admissions. Our conference was, at most, a third-order factor. Haley's decision makes sense to me. I'm still puzzled by Boston's decision.I was stunned when I heard the last part of that video. If I was recruiting against UCONN that this is exactly the talking point I would have whispered in a recruit's ear over and over again: "The Pac 12 (or any other P5 conference) is competitive and you get challenged night in and night out." As you said Haley is very smart and could have figured that out on her own but it sure didn't sound like it. I suspected that this has been part of the Anti-UCONN pitch to recruits since being stuck in the God awful conference. To hear a recruit repeating the anti-UCONN pitch is very bad news.
Hannah Gusters has transferred and will now play with her friend Sarah Andrews. Maybe.
Five-star girls basketball recruit Hannah Gusters has transferred from nationally ranked Duncanville to Irving MacArthur, giving MacArthur the state's top two recruits in the Class of 2020. Whether Gusters will be able to play for MacArthur remains to be seen.
Irving MacArthur girls basketball coach Suzie Oelschlegel said Friday that Gusters has enrolled at MacArthur but declined to comment beyond that. Duncanville coach Cathy Self-Morgan declined to comment.
Hannah Gusters transfers from Duncanville to Irving MacArthur, giving MacArthur the state's top two hoops recruits
Show me where I stated that was the main reason.
Where does it say the only reason. SOS was one of the reasons per H. Jones.I posted "UConn's strength of schedule is in the Top 3 virtually every year! IF Hailey Van Lith doesn't come to UConn it is not because of SOS."
Your reply was "It was for H. Jones"
Where does it say the only reason. SOS was one of the reasons per H. Jones.
Haley implied SOS, we are not making his up.
Please....... get off that high horse (pun intended) you are being insulting. Haley had the intelligence to get into Stanford, I think she can comprehend UCONN's SOS.!If she doesn't have the intelligence to compare UConn's SOS over the last 5 or 6 years to any other team in wcbb then she was never UConn material.
Please.. get off that high horse (pun intended) you are being insulting. Haley had the intelligence to get into Stanford, I think she can comprehend UCONN's SOS.!
Really wish you would stop questioning the intelligence of these players. It is not that serious. Haley said nor concluded nothing about UCONN. Listen to the entire video. She stated that by playing in the Pac 12 "one of the best conferences in country" (her words) she will be challenged night in and night out. The inferences (entirely mine perhaps) were that had she chose UCONN she would not be playing in one of the best conferences in the country and would not be challenged night in and night out. Simply put better teams in the Pac 12 than in the AAC.OK. So looking at the numbers I posted, how would she conclude that UConn doesn't play as tough a schedule as Stanford when in fact they play a tougher schedule? And please show your work. IMO a lot of people think they see toughness in a schedule when what they really see is name recognition. IMHO if a player swallows that sales pitch (lack of tough UConn opponents) then they lack some aspect(s) of intelligence.
I think Jones was making a canned statement complimenting Stanford. Not sure it had anything to do with UConn or their schedule. I'm betting the Stanford degree and proximity to home played the biggest parts. My guess is if she were from just about anywhere else she'd be a Husky.
Really wish you would stop questioning the intelligence of these players. It is not that serious. Haley said nor concluded nothing about UCONN. Listen to the entire video. She stated that by playing in the Pac 12 "one of the best conferences in country" (her words) she will be challenged night in and night out. The inferences (entirely mine perhaps) were that had she chose UCONN she would not be playing in one of the best conferences in the country and would not be challenged night in and night out. Simply put better teams in the Pac 12 than in the AAC.
You can keep posting and touting UCONN the strength of UCONN's OOC schedules. For these numbers to have significance you need to also post the Stanford OOC schedule for comparison. Stanford played #3 Baylor tonight and #9 TN in a few days. Shoot Haley was probably at the game. When you are done doing that I'll simply circle back to this: Ain't not teenage girl got time to analyze all that! They are likely to believe what someone (coach) tells them. That doesn't mean they are "lacking intelligence" , it makes them not interest.
Nah... I don't want to continue because it gives you an opportunity to continue being very disrespectful. Her name is Haley not "the girl".Let me "lay the facts before you". (a nod to Sir A C Doyle)
Massey SOS rank
UCONN
2018 - 2nd
2017 - 4th
2016 - 1st
2015 - 2nd
2014 - 1st
2013 - 1st
STANFORD
2018 - 6th
2017 - 3rd
2016 - 6th
2015 - 7th
2014 - 4th
2013 - 8th
Not bad for the team in "one of the best conferences in country" but not nearly as tough as UConn's, despite the AAC. SOS is blind to whether games are "in conference" or OOC. Are you?
These SOS numbers do not give extra points for being in the P12 nor do they add points for playing teams with marquee names in other college sports.
Facts are facts. I'll speculate that you think that UConn would play tough games in a P5 conference. I don't. The teams are better but saying they are tough is BS. It's like saying that playing teams of 7th graders is tougher than playing teams of 3rd graders. It's true but being tougher is not the same same as being tough. If UConn went to the ACC they would play N Dame & Louisville..... OOPS, they already play them. UConn tries to play 2 games against every P5 conference and it's usually the top teams (at least those who are willing). How many of those games have been "tough" wins or losses for the Huskies?
Now maybe the girl meant that being on a lesser team like Stanford it would be harder to beat teams like Notre Dame or Gonzaga or Baylor. Now that I would agree with, but I doubt she meant that. (Or if she didn't say those things then maybe that's what you mean).
If you disagree with this and want to continue I would need for you to provide some facts to support your position in order for me to have something to respond to. Merely attacking me by making vague and unsupported statements leads to nowhere.
And just to balance my comments I recall an interview of Geno when he was asked about coaching elsewhere. His answer was that the 2 schools he would consider were Duke and Stanford. He said that the 2 campuses and the academics would do the bulk of his recruiting for him.
And just to throw out a new theory, is it just coincidence that UConn's top 3 targets all picked female coaches? I have read that women lean one way or the other in choosing coaches. Any truth to that?
Please.. get off that high horse (pun intended) you are being insulting.
And I really wish you would come down off your high horse and stop these imperious, overblown responses to intelligent posters. He is not insulting anyone's intelligence, he is trying to make a point. And it's a good one. He is actually saying, rhetorically, that she is intelligent enough to consider SOS.Really wish you would stop questioning the intelligence of these players.
The point which could easily have been made without questioning the intelligence of the player (TWICE)!And I really wish you would come down off your high horse and stop these imperious, overblown responses to intelligent posters. He is not insulting anyone's intelligence, he is trying to make a point. And it's a good one. He is actually saying, rhetorically, that she is intelligent enough to consider SOS.
Your constant need to take some piece of what someone says and interpret it overly literally just to generate ammunition in your desire to win some competition is obnoxious and detracts from the quality of the discussions and from the quality of the board.
I really wish you would stop.
If she doesn't have the intelligence to compare UConn's SOS over the last 5 or 6 years to any other team in wcbb then she was never UConn material.
IMHO if a player swallows that sales pitch (lack of tough UConn opponents) then they lack some aspect(s) of intelligence.
I know of situations where race and/or gender mattered, especially with male players.I've often wondered whether players have a preference in playing with a male or female coach or whether the race of the coach was ever taken into consideration...I'd like to think that it really didn't matter on any of these but recruits are entitled to make that decision for themselves