Can we get back on topic? I still cannot believe people want to go to a conference that is easily poachable by the Big 12, the B1G and the SEC. Anyone involved in college sports knows this is true. The ACC has not had success in football, which means some programs would be more than happy to leave for conferences that are (much) more successful in football. "Oh, we want to go to the ACC because of regional rivalries and because they have better basketball!". Give me a break. They'll be destroyed by other conferences if conferences expand to 16 or especially 18! "Oh, we want to go to the ACC, we want to go to the ACC...!" Think like builders. Not petty fans who just care about seeing regional basketball rivals or don't care about being in a league of declining football programs or don't care about football. The university doesn't revolve around your self-interests. If you want the school's other programs to continue being the most successful they can be, you need to have the most revenue you can possibly get. And football happens to be the means towards accomplishing that. "Oh, we want to go to the ACC!". The B1G sounds nice, sure. But until then, a Big 12 with ND, Rutgers, Louisville and WVU is a better option than the freaking ACC. Geography doesn't matter much anymore. San Diego State is coming into the Big East for football. We almost had TCU for football and we were elated. The ACC is a dead man walking. The ACC itself even admits it is by saying they are not worthy of a BCS bid. The other three conferences bordering it will be more than glad to take FSU, NC State, UNC, UMD, GTech, Miami, UVA, VTech, etc. ND obviously doesn't want to add their football to the ACC. You people want to go back to talking about ECU and Temple again? Think about the whole overall picture. Not what you want to see for games next year.