But at least they'll all be in the east.The ACC will look like the AAC in 10 years, just with better leftovers as teams, because they will be picked apart.
Yea, we dominated the AACUConn is the straw that stirs northeast hoops - of course we'd survive.
I don't care if I sound spoiled or arrogant. It's the truth.
I usually don't like what if's but the recent news about Boeheim has me thinking. BTW--that is a guy who never really wanted to break up the old Big East. So I am intrigued, as we have seen so many once proud programs, break upon the rocks of the ACC, if we moved over there would we survive or end up as also rans just like all the others?
Absolutely true about the BE TournamentWe are in a great conference now… we should enjoy it… the big east tournament is second to none
Mr Wonderful is correct ✅Yea, we dominated the AAC
The future of big time college athletics will no longer intersect with conferences like the Big East.Why on earth would we ever want to move to the ACC? I do not get the enfatuation that. What former OBE team has had any modicum of success there?
Meh, please answer my question...The future of big time college athletics will no longer intersect with conferences like the Big East.
As the P5 condenses to the P2 there will be less premier spots so the “leftovers” will be off a better quality. [shrugs] It’s not much but it’s something.The ACC will look like the AAC in 10 years, just with better leftovers as teams, because they will be picked apart.
You’re seemingly only comparing Big East brand vs AAC brand relatively, which is of course night and day.UConn fans continue to underestimate the strength of the Big East brand. It is greater than the sum of its parts. The brand draws talent. It's the only way to explain that waves after waves of realignment the Big East is still on top.
We leave to a southern centric conference like the ACC and we can easily see our fate just by looking at the other ex-partners that have left. The four national championships won't do $hyt the same way it didn't do $hyt while we were in the AAC
I don't think recruiting would be an issue. It's not the American Athletic Conference so the competition and TV schedules more attractive for recruiting. Most North East Kids join the ACC teams anywayRecruiting would drop a tier, but I assume they would be ok.
Best pointsYou’re seemingly only comparing Big East brand vs AAC brand relatively, which is of course night and day.
Big East vs ACC is not some big difference to recruits. It’s a P5 conference. We would still rule NE recruiting and only expand south with membership in the ACC. Duke and UNC even without K and Roy have at least as much brand pull as the whole Big East. Our real regional rivals are there and we could absolutely drum that back up. Especially now that Wright is no longer at Nova.
And let’s not discount what it would do for football and the university at large from a $ standpoint
I agree with everything you said except.., taking BC and Pitt back in the big east… I would take Syracuse back… but know way with Pitt and definitely not BCIt is better for the players not to have to travel all over the country to play. Being able to take a bus to Providence, St John’s, Seton Hall, and Philly is huge. Also nice to be playing in major US cities of Northeast. I wish we could get BC, Syracuse, and Pitt back into the conference. Chasing the football money destroyed 3 good basketball programs at those schools.
I think the Big East is a more interesting league than ACC, which has been dominated by Duke/UNC forever. My only gripe with Big East is the officiating. It is bad across the board, with allowing players to get mugged on court at times, and pretty biased towards a few teams.