I voted yes. When UConn has three WBCA AAs, prospects look promising. Baylor's 1-2 punch was Griner and Sims, alongside solid role-players. UConn, meanwhile, is deeper and better coached. I think the 1-2 punch model of KML and Breanna may be as dominant as Griner and Sims (maybe not defensively, but certainly offensively and no slouches defensively). Add in Stef with the depth of MoJeff, Banks, Sinaya, Morgan (who could be a huge piece in her own right), Bria (ditto), and Kiah (I mean jeez, what happens if she emereges???), and this is one of the most talented UConn teams ever assembled. KML and Breanna may not be Maya and Tina, but the depth of weaponry is absolutely astounding on this team. If TASS+D with little bench to speak of could dominate like they did, I think this UConn team could match that feat.
Since Breanna's verbal commit to UConn, I've been predicting an NC in 2013-14. I stand firmly by that. Undefeated? Well, there can be flukes, but there is not a game entering this season where UConn should be favored. Baylor and Stanford won't have the horses. Duke has nice depth, but the coaching is no comparison. UConn ALWAYS comes out better prepared for battle than does Duke...or at least when the energy surge happens. If the more "middling" (if it's even appropriate to call it that) UConn team squared off with Duke in Durham in 2012 and won easily, 2014 should be uglier. Louisville isn't better than last season, and UConn handled them twice.
My question if you're voting "no" here: if you don't think UConn goes undefeated, what anticipated opponent makes a good case for being able to beat these girls?