Stokes would be a starter on several Top 25 teams.9 startable players?
Banks and Chong are unknowns. And it's more than a stretch to say Stokes is startable.
I'll grant you Chong but yes, I consider Banks very much a startable player based on her performance pre-injury last year. I, also, expect Chong to be capable of high quality minutes by mid season.9 startable players?
Banks and Chong are unknowns. And it's more than a stretch to say Stokes is startable.
But the best top 5 hands down.
If they stay injury free, a loss would surprise me.
Banks, Stokes and Chong off the bench. Yikes.
It is about injuries and little else.I do not want to be negative but remember 2001. Nothing is guaranteed if KML and Stewie go down (god forbid) it is possible we have the same kind of season
No...........We will not go undefeated. Just trying to be realistic. We will lose 3 or 4 games during the season ; Win the Conference ; Win our Conference Tournament ; Get a 1 or 2 seed in the NCAA ( Just because its the AAC Conference and not the BE) ; And make it to the FF.
Too many things have to go perfectly right for us to go undefeated. We have to be healthy throughout the season. And that doesn't happen too often. We are coming off some injuries to Stef and Banks. There ae some good teams on the schedule and we are short-handed in bodies .
We have excellent talent , and excellent coaching. But its a long season and everything would have to fall into place perfectly to go undefeated.
It is about injuries and little else.
Not in the least bit true.I voted "no", here's my reasoning. It's a young and thin team. If everything goes right, there's certainly the talent there to win every game, but much of the leadership and punch is going to need to come from the sophs and juniors. There's an element of unreliability there when you have to count on underclassmen. There's also no room for any major injuries, and there are 4 players coming back from different stages and types of being hurt. They all need to heal well for the team to perform on the level being suggested here--and nobody else can get hurt. I remember Shea and Svet, I remember Mel and KG, there's no way a team with only nine scholarship players could take two season-ending injuries and do anything more than play out the numbers.
Banks and Stokes would start for all but maybe five or six teams in the country. Yes, Chong is an unknown. Wouldn't surprise me if she was startable. But it wouldn't surprise me if she wasn't good enough to get any meaningful minutes at all.9 startable players?
Banks and Chong are unknowns. And it's more than a stretch to say Stokes is startable.
But the best top 5 hands down.
If they stay injury free, a loss would surprise me.
VG, just realized you were referring to Banks' injury. Fair enough. I stand by my comment on Stokes.Banks and Stokes would start for all but maybe five or six teams in the country. Yes, Chong is an unknown. Wouldn't surprise me if she was startable. But it wouldn't surprise me if she wasn't good enough to get any meaningful minutes at all.
I wouldn't ever call the team thin but there is a shortage of bodies. Your projected minutes (assuming a hypothetical loss of 2 players to season-ending injuries) predicts a lot of minutes for a lot of players, which would put additional wear-and-tear on the healthy teammates. 38 minutes for Breanna and 35 for Stef would scare me a bit. Stef had a bad wheel last year in only averaging 27 mpg. But losing 2 players to season-ending injuries is still a pretty unlikely (though certainly not unheard of) event.Not in the least bit true.
Suppose KML and Kiah have season-ending injuries, just to take an example. Here is how you fill 200 minutes with the rest of the team:
C: Stef 35, Breanna 5
PF: Breanna 33, Morgan 7
SF: Morgan 25, Banks 15
SG: Bria 22, Banks 8, Soniya 10
PG: Moriah 28, Bria 12
What team in the country would be favored to beat that? (correct answer: none) How many would come even close? (correct answer: 2 or 3 at most)
You could quibble and point out that this is a three-guard lineup when Banks is at the 3. Or that the team would be vulnerable to foul trouble. But, what team in the country could lose two players to season ending injuries and NOT be vulnerable to foul trouble?
And you can do the same with almost any combination of two players. As far as I can see the only combination of injuries that would make life really difficult would be: KML and Breanna (even UConn would have trouble losing the top two players in the country), Moriah and Bria, Stef and Kiah. Stef and Breanna, Kiah and Breanna. (That's 5 out of 36 combinations btw)
This is not a thin team by any stretch of the imagination.
I wouldn't ever call the team thin but there is a shortage of bodies. Your projected minutes (assuming a hypothetical loss of 2 players to season-ending injuries) predicts a lot of minutes for a lot of players, which would put additional wear-and-tear on the healthy teammates. 38 minutes for Breanna and 35 for Stef would scare me a bit. Stef had a bad wheel last year in only averaging 27 mpg. But losing 2 players to season-ending injuries is still a pretty unlikely (though certainly not unheard of) event.
I'm in there with Vowelguy.
If one was to express reticence with regard the likelihood of an undefeated season one could start with Stokes and Banks. The former still has to prove that she can perform at a high level and the latter's return from injury is always a question, at least in the first season back (think Ms. Greene). Interestingly, if I was to pick a star from "guy's" three, I would pick Chong.
But that leaves only seven top performers. One injury and the six remaining is too few, no matter how good (I hedge here, the little birdie in my ear says the top six can still defeat the world).
I figure Jeff will figure out a way for his kids to get their three's off this time and we all saw what happened.