TheFarmFan
Stanford Fan, Huskies Admirer
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2018
- Messages
- 2,680
- Reaction Score
- 19,133
Unless you have some concrete evidence to think Notre Dame mattered (and I haven't heard any), deciding to think much less of Shepard (your original conclusion) simply for asserting what she found was relevant and not relevant to her waiver application process - in her first-hand experience - seems unreasonable to me. I can't disprove that Beyonce didn't call the NCAA and ask for them to grant Shepard's waiver, but unless someone furnishes evidence that Beyonce did, the need for Shepard to offer evidence to disprove that Beyonce's involvement seems totally bizarre to me. How can she disprove the existence of any and all manner of black swans?I never said her claim was implausible. But if she's making a claim, she bears the burden of proof, not me.
Just because no one formally asked "why Notre Dame" or formally asked for interviews Notre Dame folks doesn't prove anything about whether the destination school was a factor in the process. Unless she can **prove** that the people considering her request were unaware of which school she had transferred to, she hasn't proven anything. Only stated her belief. Her belief may be a plausible one, but it hasn't been proven.
ETA: A moderator seems to have edited out my non-partisan reference to a politician in a geographically-relevant hypothetical, but the omission completely obliterated the point I was trying to make, so hopefully this time it can stay...?
Last edited:
