- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 28,409
- Reaction Score
- 40,683
That may be true, I have no idea. Or maybe the media don't think her actions are newsworthy. Give an example of what she should be doing that would make a difference. Maybe she should have strenuously objected. Maybe she understands the Big East's situation and squawking about it will only make the conference look weaker. I don't know.
“Based on the numbers we have reviewed, the liability of the 22 non-FBS conferences under the proposed formula appears disproportionately high, particularly because the primary beneficiaries of the NIL ‘back pay’ amounts are expected to be FBS football players,” Ackerman wrote. “I have voiced the Big East's strong objections to the proposed damages framework through recent emails to [NCAA president] Charlie Baker and his counsel and through comments during commissioner calls over the past two weeks.”
"While Ackerman and other non-FBS leaders plan to fight for a change in the formula, she is “unclear how much time or leverage” they have in such a battle with the leading defendants in the case: the high-revenue generating football powers in the Big Ten, Big 12, SEC, ACC and remaining and former members of the Pac-12."
![]()
NCAA's settlement proposal facing 'strong objection' from Big East
College sports insiders describe this week as the most consequential in college sports history.sports.yahoo.com
For starters. She should simply make an appearance instead of making $1.75M a year for reading Eat, Pray, Love on a beach somewhere.
Baby steps.
Glad you typed all that Detective.