Like he's a good A-10 senior guy. He's at best -a good 7/8 guy for us if everything falls in. Utterly and completely underwhelmed and if we're burning a year for him - major yikes.No good way to spin that and we should be spending that roster spot better elsewhere.
Well i mean he's coming. But he's the first Hurley guy i'm super no into. He's a stylistic finisher at the rim, blows a lot of bunnies and makes some incomprehensibly stupid passes offensively. He's got the vision of a mole. Nose for loose ball rebounds. Can shoot. Long story, short - we should be moving on from guys like him.
Like he's a good A-10 senior guy. He's at best -a good 7/8 guy for us if everything falls in. Utterly and completely underwhelmed and if we're burning a year for him - major yikes.No good way to spin that and we should be spending that roster spot better elsewhere.
Don’t get why everyone is down on him. If Hurley has shown us anything he’s shown us he has an eye for talent. The kid can clearly play. He just needs to refine his game. This is the 2nd time Hurley has clearly made this kid a priority. Maybe we should trust that just a little bit more...
Also, we can’t go into 2021 with 5-6 scholarships to fill. This kid will bring value, and Hurley will get more out of him than what you’ve seen
Sorry you feel that way.
I’ll trust the guy who is making north of 2 mil a year coaching who has recruited Martin in the past over some jaded media type. Hurley wouldn’t waste a scholarship on him if he didn’t feel he would fit our ‘scheme’. Maybe, just maybe, Hurley valued Martin over Vaughn all along and Vaughn committed to Ole Miss once he heard UConn was going in a different direction. Timing reveals a lot. The timing of Sid, the timing of Vaughn, the timing of Martin. Let's keep our fingers crossed for Nolley. I would hope for news in the next few days. The longer it goes on the less likely it becomes.“But you have to wonder where he fits into the scheme.”
Exactly the point I’ve been trying to make. For Nolley and Sanogo it is clear where they’d fit in the scheme.
It’s simple. Martin is a prototypical Hurley type player. The past two years,Watched all of the full games I could find.
1. He is not a guard. He is not a swing. He is a wing. 100%. He can't dribble with his right hand (but shoots righty), which made it tough for him to go 1v1 to the rim. Tough rebounder... seems to take pride in it.
2. He seemed really disengaged on both ends of the court at times. It was the Fatts and Dowtin show down there, and I'm just not sure how he fit in. I would be a little miffed too. Plays weren't really run for him much at all, which made it tough to find an offensive identity, especially at the rim.
3. I think he has the potential to be a nasty, versatile defender. He has prototypical wing size, solid athleticism and moves really well laterally. With his size/strength he could guard 1-4 if he puts his mind to it. Made some really, really impressive plays when he was engaged. He needs to change his mentality--I think Hurley can bring that out.
4. His shot is definitely improving from HS. Setpoint and release are smoother... trending in the right direction. Still has wonky hand position on the ball.
Well i mean he's coming. But he's the first Hurley guy i'm super no into. He's a stylistic finisher at the rim, blows a lot of bunnies and makes some incomprehensibly stupid passes offensively. He's got the vision of a mole. Nose for loose ball rebounds. Can shoot. Long story, short - we should be moving on from guys like him.
Like he's a good A-10 senior guy. He's at best -a good 7/8 guy for us if everything falls in. Utterly and completely underwhelmed and if we're burning a year for him - major yikes.No good way to spin that and we should be spending that roster spot better elsewhere.
I've been getting killed for the opinion but yes I'd still take both. If it's an either/or I don't love if it's Martin over Nolley, but I think Martin is a very good playerThose Boneyarders who really want Nolley - you do realize that Martin is a similar size and plays the same positions. Do you want this player if you also want Nolley? Even if both have to sit a year?
Doesn't matter who we want, matters who wants us.Those Boneyarders who really want Nolley - you do realize that Martin is a similar size and plays the same positions. Do you want this player if you also want Nolley? Even if both have to sit a year?
You absolutely take both and play both. The yard is a weird place sometimes. Martin is a very good get.I've been getting killed for the opinion but yes I'd still take both. If it's an either/or I don't love if it's Martin over Nolley, but I think Martin is a very good player
Wait till the 70% of this board who thought Vital sucked for the majority of his career see Martin play.
Well i mean he's coming. But he's the first Hurley guy i'm super no into. He's a stylistic finisher at the rim, blows a lot of bunnies and makes some incomprehensibly stupid passes offensively. He's got the vision of a mole. Nose for loose ball rebounds. Can shoot. Long story, short - we should be moving on from guys like him.
Like he's a good A-10 senior guy. He's at best -a good 7/8 guy for us if everything falls in. Utterly and completely underwhelmed and if we're burning a year for him - major yikes.No good way to spin that and we should be spending that roster spot better elsewhere.
Those Boneyarders who really want Nolley - you do realize that Martin is a similar size and plays the same positions. Do you want this player if you also want Nolley? Even if both have to sit a year?
Wait till the 70% of this board who thought Vital sucked for the majority of his career see Martin play.
agreedSounds like Sid