- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 93,147
- Reaction Score
- 365,182
Thread on rationale for NIU move to MWC:
It will basically take college enrollment numbers down to where they were around the year 2000 or so. But expenses today are higher than they were back then and state governments give much less money now than back then. But most D1 universities will be ok as you noted. It’s the small schools who might be in trouble.
Buffalo is R1 and AAU. Not going anywhere.
Miami is a public ivy. Not going anywhere.
In addition to Buffalo, Kent State, Ohio and UMass are R1. Not going anywhere.
They will adapt, but they aren’t going anywhere.
Thread on rationale for NIU move to MWC:
And it cuts the money paid out to G6 conferences. One conference needs to die to increase payouts to the others five.Gotta hand it to the MWC commish. I thought that conference was dead in the water, but they managed to hold UNLV and add 4 schools + 1 FB-only school, to give them 9 teams for FB and 10 for BB.
Yes, they'll be battling C-USA for the weakest G6, but the fact that they're still alive is impressive.
1) Why does it matter? Isnt # of schools the factor? Why would payout/school be higher if there are 5 conferences instead of 6 (with same total # of schools)?And it cuts the money paid out to G6 conferences. One conference needs to die to increase payouts to the others five.
Because conference offices take a cut. And additional FBS schools also cause harm.1) Why does it matter? Isnt # of schools the factor? Why would payout/school be higher if there are 5 conferences instead of 6 (with same total # of schools)?
2) Not gonna happen. Thru the 40 years ending 2026, have averaged one new FBS school a year. And more will come, to further shore up the G6. We may even get a G7 if the WAC/ASUN schools move up.
There will be at least 68 Gx schools, in conferences of 14-11-12-9-7-14
With the 7 expected to increase.
I'm pretty sure UConn makes more money as an independenthypothetical:
football-only invite for UConn?
i'd tell the MAC to kick rocks.
I want no part of MAC-tion on a tuesday.
Won’t happen unless the MAC changes their stance on football only members.hypothetical:
football-only invite for UConn?
MAC schools make $800k a year for all sports from their TV deal. UConn will be making 10x that from TV deals once the new BE contract starts ($7.3M from BE + $500k from CBSSN)I'm pretty sure UConn makes more money as an independent
It won't happen period. The likelihood of the MAC changing its stance on football only members is greater than UConn accepting a football only invite to the MAC. The MAC finally got UMass to go all in only to lose Nothern Illinois. I don't think UConn would even consider an AAC or PAC 12 football only invite at this point. Big 12 or ACC until those options are concrete no's.Won’t happen unless the MAC changes their stance on football only members.
This has already been addressed:I don't think UConn would even consider an AAC or PAC 12 football only invite at this point. Big 12 or ACC until those options are concrete no's.
Won’t happen unless the MAC changes their stance on football only members.
realignment is making everyone change their stance. As fat joe says "yesterday's price is not today's price!"It won't happen period. The likelihood of the MAC changing its stance on football only members is greater than UConn accepting a football only invite to the MAC. The MAC finally got UMass to go all in only to lose Nothern Illinois. I don't think UConn would even consider an AAC or PAC 12 football only invite at this point. Big 12 or ACC until those options are concrete no's.
realignment is making everyone change their stance. As fat joe says "yesterday's price is not today's price!"
i.e. - the picky/choosy MAC of yesterday that forced UMass to sacrifice its whole Athletic Department for the sake of football stability, is not the same MAC now that NIU is gone.
FWIW, I think UMass made a YUGE mistake letting go of a good thing in the A10 - but i digress.
Agree with Kolumbo, but re-worded as --- I think today, the MAC is absolutely capable of lowering their demands to get a brand name like UConn in their portfolio, even if only football. Again - NIU changes the negotiation.
If the situation gets dire, they will call us - But as others have said, we won't pick up the phone.
We're all in on the real deal - P4 or bust.