- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction Score
- 379
As opposed to the other ten schools that they made a seven year commitment with?A real slap in the face. About damn time they help us out.
As opposed to the other ten schools that they made a seven year commitment with?A real slap in the face. About damn time they help us out.
As opposed to the other ten schools that they made a seven year commitment with?
I am confident we gonna get the votes needed to get in. Why?
1. They want us to establish the Eastern beachfront. This will allow the B12 to grab teams from the ACC when it implodes. Also, B12 removed us as a potential backfill piece when FSU and Clemson leave.
2. We will help with the best basketball conference marketing effort.
3. We come in revenue neutral meaning no team will take a financial haircut.
4. We were penciled in the last time according to Iowa ST AD until the 4 corner school happened. B12 was going to invite us with Colorado had the PAC-12 stayed together.
5. We give them a presence in the NYC. This is huge for the B12 and Yormark. NYC is still the mecca for basketball.
6. Presidents love to be associated with top academic schools, and we would be the highest ranked academic schools in the B12 from day 1.
Now we just need to wait for the good news.
If you’ve read the tweets in this thread then you’re as informed as anyone. It seems that they’re voting on UConn as an Olympic sports member as soon as 26 and football by 31, provided we hit some financial milestones. We have no other details other than a ballpark of $15mill/year until full membership. People are hoping for a football scheduling agreement in the meantimeDoes anyone know what they’re voting on?
I am confident we gonna get the votes needed to get in. Why?
1. They want us to establish the Eastern beachfront. This will allow the B12 to grab teams from the ACC when it implodes. Also, B12 removed us as a potential backfill piece when FSU and Clemson leave.
2. We will help with the best basketball conference marketing effort.
3. We come in revenue neutral meaning no team will take a financial haircut.
4. We were penciled in the last time according to Iowa ST AD until the 4 corner school happened. B12 was going to invite us with Colorado had the PAC-12 stayed together.
5. We give them a presence in the NYC. This is huge for the B12 and Yormark. NYC is still the mecca for basketball.
6. Presidents love to be associated with top academic schools, and we would be the highest ranked academic schools in the B12 from day 1.
Now we just need to wait for the good news.
I get that it serves the Big East's interest to hang onto UConn as long as possible, even if it means we get frozen out of big-time sports in the long run and our programs get left behind. But keep in mind that it was the private Catholic non-FBS schools that, for understandable reasons, made the decision to leave the Big East and split from the FBS schools (acknowledging Georgetown was the only one who voted against it). The Big East with football was GREAT for UConn. But 10 years after UConn had, at the Big East's behest, upgraded its football program at tremendous expense, including building a state-funded stadium, the non-football-schools essentially flipped the script on us. They put a gun to UConn's head and made us choose between dropping FBS football and pretty much just taking a loss on that entire investment (which was going very well at the time), or trying to go our own way while retaining football. We did not want to be in either situation, but we made the logical choice, and the AAC wound up being a poor cultural fit for us, especially after Louisville got poached. All of our sports programs suffered (except women's hoops maybe).As opposed to the other ten schools that they made a seven year commitment with?
The latest Big East media deal is the final nail in the coffin. We simply can't survive on a $8M per year payout since it doesn't even cover Hurley's salary. If it was $12M to $15M per year, it would be a tougher choice.I get that it serves the Big East's interest to hang onto UConn as long as possible, even if it means we get frozen out of big-time sports in the long run and our programs get left behind. But keep in mind that it was the private Catholic non-FBS schools that, for understandable reasons, made the decision to leave the Big East and split from the FBS schools (acknowledging Georgetown was the only one who voted against it). The Big East with football was GREAT for UConn. But 10 years after UConn had, at the Big East's behest, upgraded its football program at tremendous expense, including building a state-funded stadium, the non-football-schools essentially flipped the script on us. They put a gun to UConn's head and made us choose between dropping FBS football and pretty much just taking a loss on that entire investment (which was going very well at the time), or trying to go our own way while retaining football. We did not want to be in either situation, but we made the logical choice, and the AAC wound up being a poor cultural fit for us, especially after Louisville got poached. All of our sports programs suffered (except women's hoops maybe).
It certainly helped both UConn and the Big East for us to rejoin in 2020, but it's not like the Big East didn't write very onerous terms into UConn's contract that account for the likelihood that UConn would eventually leave for a suitable football-playing conference. It's not unreasonable for UConn to try to survive and be what it wants to be, which is a state flagship university that has top-flight sports programs, including football. Other states get to do that. Why not us? UConn fans love the Big East rivalries, but the remaining schools are fundamentally very different from UConn, and we can't be in the same exact boat forever.
Intentional or not sabotage is the effect.
I really don’t like this so out in the open.
Did anyone notice that in the Gary Parrish Matt Norlander video, Norlander said that UConn wouldn't get a full share of football money when they join in 2031? I thought we were getting a full share in 2031.
He says it at 3:57.
Did anyone notice that in the Gary Parrish Matt Norlander video, Norlander said that UConn wouldn't get a full share of football money when they join in 2031? I thought we were getting a full share in 2031.
He says it at 3:57.
Interesting article I thought I’d drop here on how much it would cost to leave the Big East.
it's more costly not to do it.
Norlander said it won't be completed even by the middle of September.It feels like this has culminated. It’s a good thing to not vote just yet, maybe this gets revisited in a few months when basketball is in full swing.
we know you'd rather be Seton Hall North, you don't have to keep saying it.Can someone show me what the business model for college football will be in 2027 with a pro forma income statement? I bet there is not an athletic director in the country that can do that. So how do we have any idea whether it is more costly or not to stay or go?
I would hope Bobby Hurley is lobbying for us and will do what Zona tells them. I have them in my yes and Houston in the maybe column.guarantee the 6 are, UCF, West Virginia, Cincinnati, Kansas, Houston, and Arizona
I think schools that would be easier to convince Baylor, Tech, Iowa State
I think the most important votes, Oklahoma State, Kansas State, and TCU
if it's 2 no's those are Utah and Arizona State who's presidents don't seem to happy being in the conference as is
This post is correct, but I made one small fix.I disagree. Stuff takes time, and taking time means more people will find out. The chance of one of the people telling an outsider goes up dramatically as the number of people "in the know" go up. In other words, the Big 12 knew it would leak.
I would like an accelerated process, but I am sure that every time a league considers an accelerated process, someone points out that Rutgers is in the Big 10 and Louisville in the ACC, showing that, especially with Boston College to the ACC, massive errors are possible if a league doesn't think expansion through.
Can someone show me what the business model for college football will be in 2027 with a pro forma income statement? I bet there is not an athletic director in the country that can do that. So how do we have any idea whether it is more costly or not to stay or go?
Agreed. It may cost more at first; but should payoff over time. Also, seems like it's a lot easier to remain a power conference school than it is to become one. If the opportunity to become a P4 school opens up, UConn has to grab it.it's more costly not to do it.