- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 9,608
- Reaction Score
- 43,033
Are you?I like these two players, but not sure it's a great sign for us to take both. We're extremely short on sure impact players for next year and I'm growing concerned that Adams could be on his way out.
I like these two players, but not sure it's a great sign for us to take both. We're extremely short on sure impact players for next year and I'm growing concerned that Adams could be on his way out.
Poor man's AA? I see them at the same level. Suspect outside shooters who had big games off the bench who can score, play d and handle the ball. HE had a good solid lists of schools who wanted him.Entirely agree. The signs are that Dan Hurley knows something we don't. Smith looks like a poor man's Anderson, except that he can't make even 2/3 of his FT's. 65% in each of his two seasons at Duquesne. It's a desperation move to sign a PG that you can't risk playing in the late stages of a close game. A lot of blind trust being asked here.
I like these two players, but not sure it's a great sign for us to take both. We're extremely short on sure impact players for next year and I'm growing concerned that Adams could be on his way out.
Entirely agree. The signs are that Dan Hurley knows something we don't. Smith looks like a poor man's Anderson, except that he can't make even 2/3 of his FT's. 65% in each of his two seasons at Duquesne. It's a desperation move to sign a PG that you can't risk playing in the late stages of a close game. A lot of blind trust being asked here.
I don't get how either signing today means anything on Adams. Gilbert has played in what like 5 games for us the last 2 years? We just had 3 freshman decommit. We needed depth.
Who?Smith helps us with a friend of his....
Sorry if it’s been said, but who?Smith helps us with a friend of his....
Smith is just one year and there really isn't anybody else that was better available that we had a chance to get. Unless you wanted Johnson for 4 years? We want to run a 3 guard offense at times and this gives us the depth to do it.My hunch is that he's a little better than Anderson. 65% from the line isn't ideal, but it isn't as if he's R.J. Evans and definitely hyperbole to say you can't play him late in games. But yeah, we only have one ship left now assuming there are no further departures, and we're hosting the St. John's kid as we speak. To me, if you're in a healthy spot, you're choosing between Adams and Smith. I could be off though.
Part of the reason those freshman decommitted was that they weren't that good. Replacing them with more players who aren't that good gets us to the same place we were headed. Depth is nice, but we need high level talent that can produce right away.
We absolutely needed 5 guards given the injury history of AG and now we have it. That is also exactly why Hurley is targeting grad transfers so he can focus on getting high level talent in '19. It's too late in the process for '18 unless he finds a needle in a haystack.My hunch is that he's a little better than Anderson. 65% from the line isn't ideal, but it isn't as if he's R.J. Evans and definitely hyperbole to say you can't play him late in games. But yeah, we only have one ship left now assuming there are no further departures, and we're hosting the St. John's kid as we speak. To me, if you're in a healthy spot, you're choosing between Adams and Smith. I could be off though.
Part of the reason those freshman decommitted was that they weren't that good. Replacing them with more players who aren't that good gets us to the same place we were headed. Depth is nice, but we need high level talent that can produce right away.
You can’t leave us hanging like that.....Smith helps us with a friend of his....
Part of the reason those freshman decommitted was that they weren't that good. Replacing them with more players who aren't that good gets us to the same place we were headed. Depth is nice, but we need high level talent that can produce right away.
You can’t leave us hanging like that.....
So this means Lecque is still possible for 2018?Heard he is friendly with Silverio and Lecque
So this means Lecque is still possible for 2018?
Is who/what you’re referring to?Slim but possible.
I don’t think a poor mans “AA” exists in D1.Entirely agree. The signs are that Dan Hurley knows something we don't. Smith looks like a poor man's Anderson, except that he can't make even 2/3 of his FT's. 65% in each of his two seasons at Duquesne. It's a desperation move to sign a PG that you can't risk playing in the late stages of a close game. A lot of blind trust being asked here.
Slim but possible.
Pipeline. Word of mouth. "This coach is good and brought the best out of me."Then why would Smith help with Lecque if they would never play together?
They actually friends? Smith doesn’t follow either of those guys on Instagram and he follows 1000+. Or is it more of a connection to similar aau programs/coaches?Heard he is friendly with Silverio and Lecque
The Smith move is about having bodies next year. If things work out he is the guy who comes in and plays 3-4 minutes a half to give the main guy a breather. I think Adams is a guy with an upside but isn’t taking us to the promised land next season.
I like these two players, but not sure it's a great sign for us to take both. We're extremely short on sure impact players for next year and I'm growing concerned that Adams could be on his way out.
I'm going out on a limb here and throwing out that maybe . . . just maybe . . . Dan Hurley is looking for things that you are not. Maybe - just possibly - he sees things in this kid that you don't. Or can't. Or won't.It's a desperation move to sign a PG that you can't risk playing in the late stages of a close game.