UCFBfan
Semi Kings of New England!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 5,998
- Reaction Score
- 12,515
I was thinking this about the MSG Bracket actuallyThe Gampel bracket is stacked.
I was thinking this about the MSG Bracket actuallyThe Gampel bracket is stacked.
No way in hell he should be seeded above Henefeld. Seriously, that's just egregious.You can make the argument that he is way overrated as a 6 seed.
Definitely this. Have to give Bazz the edge over Ray. Ray was great but didn’t deliver a championship.4 one seeds should be Kemba, Rip, Emeka and Shabazz.
What about Ray's championship with Boston and becoming the greatest 3 point shooter in NBA history...?I think if you're going to weigh college and pro careers equally, Kemba is the GOAT.
Then Ray second. I hate to say it because he is a great, great player, and one of my favorites but other than maybe in Seattle, he was never really a focal point on any team.
Guys may have had better college or pro careers but I think Kemba has the best credentials in both.
Shabazz has 2 championships, 1st Team All-Big East (2013), 1st Team All-AAC (2014), Bob Cousy Award Winner (2014), Final Four MVP (2014), Consensus 1st Team All-America (2014), AAC POY (2014), and Big East All-Rookie Team (2011).
He’s a one seed. The championships set him a step above Ray, even though he was a better player.
What about Ray's championship with Boston and becoming the greatest 3 point shooter in NBA history...?
What about Ray's championship with Boston and becoming the greatest 3 point shooter in NBA history...?
Spot onWho's the most overseeded player in the bracket? I loved Purvis, but an 8 seed? Not sure about that when you consider some of the names ranked lower than him - Marcus, Jerome, DHam, Deandre to name a few.
What about Ray's championship with Boston and becoming the greatest 3 point shooter in NBA history...?
To be fair, so did Bazz. His pressure and steals are as important as Emeka's blocks and rim protection. Both were able to alter what the offense wanted to do.
Edit...
I'm not saying you're wrong, it's what makes the discussion interesting, once you get past the Sweet 16, a lot of these come down to a coin flip
Tell that to the Harrison brothers. Bazz and Boat took them completely out of their game in the national championship.I love Shabazz, but he had nowhere near the defensive impact that Okafor did. Don't kid yourself.
Tell that to the Harrison brothers. Bazz and Boat took them completely out of their game in the national championship.
He was the best player on the Bucks by 2000 and he led them to the ECF in 2001 where they were robbed of losing to the Lakers in the Finals.I think if you're going to weigh college and pro careers equally, Kemba is the GOAT.
Then Ray second. I hate to say it because he is a great, great player, and one of my favorites but other than maybe in Seattle, he was never really a focal point on any team.
Guys may have had better college or pro careers but I think Kemba has the best credentials in both.
I think if you're going to weigh college and pro careers equally, Kemba is the GOAT.
Then Ray second. I hate to say it because he is a great, great player, and one of my favorites but other than maybe in Seattle, he was never really a focal point on any team.
Guys may have had better college or pro careers but I think Kemba has the best credentials in both.
If the goal is to determine the Greatest Husky of All Time, I think brackets are not the right way to get there. As @Mano would say, make it a poll, dummy. Take all the #1 and #2 seeds and have people vote among them. Add the #3 seeds if necessary; that's still only 12 options. Anything beyond that is great for seeding discussions/arguments, but really irrelevant to determining the greatest.
Any set of criteria is going to include some intangibles, and certain players are going to suffer from recency bias. Khalid will always be my personal favorite because he was the X-factor, the roux that we needed to make our own special brand of mojo. But no matter how you characterize "Greatest Husky of All Time," if we are talking about embracing everything you would want that to embrace, e.g., winning, grit, representing, etc., I think Kemba wins by a wide margin--all things considered.
If the goal is to determine the Greatest Husky of All Time, I think brackets are not the right way to get there. As @Mano would say, make it a poll, dummy. Take all the #1 and #2 seeds and have people vote among them. Add the #3 seeds if necessary; that's still only 12 options. Anything beyond that is great for seeding discussions/arguments, but really irrelevant to determining the greatest.
Any set of criteria is going to include some intangibles, and certain players are going to suffer from recency bias. Khalid will always be my personal favorite because he was the X-factor, the roux that we needed to make our own special brand of mojo. But no matter how you characterize "Greatest Husky of All Time," if we are talking about embracing everything you would want that to embrace, e.g., winning, grit, representing, etc., I think Kemba wins by a wide margin--all things considered.