- Joined
- Dec 8, 2015
- Messages
- 14,861
- Reaction Score
- 115,518
Ended up w/ 6/3/6 vs Bates fundamentals in a blowout win. 3/4 from the field, no threes taken. 3 TOs. 1 STL.
It's his thing, makes him feel special.Do you really feel the need to bash Donovan Clingan every chance you get?
We have 3 open after Floyd and Clingan, but I have a hard time seeing both Rodgers and Karaban coming even if we could theoretically fit both and a guardI assume it’s Rodgers or Karaban. Do we even have room for both? CFJ and Clingan both on board. We are recruiting still recruiting for a guard (anglin).
How many schollies will we have open?
You responded to me saying I was trying to move off the topic to telling me to stop. Seems pretty pointless to me but okay. I think, at heart, you want me to keep goingI responded before. Just stop. Ruining 2 threads and counting. Your opinion is just not that important. I assume you are, at heart, A decent guy. Just stop.

Ahh yes, the one of very few opinions that differs from most on this board and now I’m doing it to feel special.It's his thing, makes him feel special.
i saw this last night but couldnt tell if it was a recent pin. his official visit was 6/11. v interesting. hadnt heard hurley and staff were watching his games in the last month.
are you counting cole's scholly among the 3? assuming he returns i count 2 open schollys (polley + whaley + martin + open scholly - clingan and floyd) i definitley dont want 5 freshmen in 22 at the expense of losing our starting PG.We have 3 open after Floyd and Clingan, but I have a hard time seeing both Rodgers and Karaban coming even if we could theoretically fit both and a guard
Yeah I'm including Cole's. I think it's likely he comes back but until he's actually coming back it's an open scholarship to fill. I'd have no problem taking 5 freshman, those issues tend to work themselves out if Cole wanted to stayare you counting cole's scholly among the 3? assuming he returns i count 2 open schollys (polley + whaley + martin + open scholly - clingan and floyd) i definitley dont want 5 freshmen in 22 at the expense of losing our starting PG.
technically sure but i'm putting him coming back at 99% given we arent recruiting any PGs in '22. sophomore diggins won't be ready to lead us to the final 4 quite yet.Yeah I'm including Cole's. I think it's likely he comes back but until he's actually coming back it's an open scholarship to fill. I'd have no problem taking 5 freshman, those issues tend to work themselves out if Cole wanted to stay
It really was LOLThat is funny.
Please show me where someone posted this.
You can’t be serious right now. I’m not one for name calling but you can’t be that stupid can you?![]()
2022 Recruiting: - Ty Rodgers
I don't follow AAU like you and some others on here because I'm put off by it, but if I recall correctly he was the top player in Pittsburgh earlier this year. If there is video of it maybe you can check it out if you haven't already. I sent him video from AAU the last time this came, forget...the-boneyard.com
Consider a simple "Thank you" next time. (It was in the post DIRECTLY above yours.)
Pot, kettle.You can’t be serious right now. I’m not one for name calling but you can’t be that stupid can you?
All this when you could've simply just said I missed that.. cause you did. I was told someone told me that information before, that was false. I knew it was false which is why I asked when someone did do that (because they didn't). You jumped in with your cape on saying that the guy was referring to his own post, which is stupid. But if these mental gymnastics you're doing in your post with eloquent writing helps you feel smarter then sure I guess. But you could've simply just said you missed the mark there. I think this is the part of his post you're missing that was false that generated my response.Pot, kettle.
When your clarity of expression rises to wondering if such information was ever previously posted, you might also rise to the courtesy of simple, polite appreciation toward someone who provided what you asked for rather than being rude. And you might even acknowledge that he did so without suggesting that you might have missed things elsewhere, as has been demonstrated by others elsewhere on this and other things about Donovan Clingan and his successful recruitment.
NB: I've got pretty much something for any bounceback you want to try as to form/content/attitude/intelligence/grammar/whatever, but I'll henceforth sit tight until you and I both see further metrics in pre-college play and/or performance in a Husky uniform in order to assess if he meets your satisfaction. It's amply clear that you can't yet muster much enthusiasm for how he has shown up so far at age 17, which is your perfect right, however imperfectly expressed.
Over & out.
My DC comments got people coming at me like!
It's not the comments. It's how you comment.
I'm starting to come around on him, I was hesitant at first because of the lack of shooting but he's so talented that he's worth taking a shot on. Just tough to play him and Jackson together. Still want Karaban more than anyone else thoughReal nice handle for his size. Strong and athletic. Excellent and versatile defender.
He's a 3 pt shot away from being a lottery pick. High ceiling.
For sure. From those box scores you posted too (appreciate those btw) I like the fact he seems pretty efficient and knows what he does well. Doesn’t try to take a lot of 3s if he’s not a good shooter right now.Real nice handle for his size. Strong and athletic. Excellent and versatile defender.
He's a 3 pt shot away from being a lottery pick. High ceiling.
He's a beast defensively. Agree, he has the look of a future pro just needs to improve his shot.Real nice handle for his size. Strong and athletic. Excellent and versatile defender.
He's a 3 pt shot away from being a lottery pick. High ceiling.
I'm starting to come around on him, I was hesitant at first because of the lack of shooting but he's so talented that he's worth taking a shot on. Just tough to play him and Jackson together. Still want Karaban more than anyone else though
I agree if we were a very strong shooting team I would feel a lot more comfortable adding him but when we still need shooting is definitely a risk.Rodgers looks great. I so prefer shooters though. Makes life so much easier. Even Syracuse and their crummy squad made noise in the tourney last year because they had a couple guys who could shoot and got hot in March.