oldude
bamboo lover
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
- Messages
- 20,120
- Reaction Score
- 191,219
ISWYDT.......with social distancing, dating yourself is the best way!
ISWYDT.......with social distancing, dating yourself is the best way!
In the military, many things that you have to do seemed pointless, especially in boot camp, like shining your shoes, folding your clothing in a precise manner, making up your rack, etc. but once you graduated boot camp, you were allowed to live off base, wear coraform (?) shoes and so on. But the real purpose was to learn to follow orders and to make sure everyone's uniform were in fact uniform. So I get these UConn rules and am glad that they are still enforced. But even if they are someday relaxed, I would hate to ever see a Huskie wearing diaper shorts. That would be terrible, IMO.

That would only happen if Geno was wearing diaper shorts.![]()
I've other questions. If the NCAA allows seniors to return for one more season, can that senior then transfer and play for another team after one year? If The NCAA allows for a one time transfer without penalty, can that returning senior then transfer without penalty?I have a question. If a player enters the transfer portal under one head coach, that head coach is fired and replaced another coach. The player still transfers despite the coaching chance, should player transferring count against the former coach or the new coach?
I've other questions. If the NCAA allows seniors to return for one more season, can that senior then transfer and play for another team after one year? If The NCAA allows for a one time transfer without penalty, can that returning senior then transfer without penalty?
Not really clear on the question. Why does it have to “count against” one coach or the other? A student-athlete transfers from a school, not a coach.I have a question. If a player enters the transfer portal under one head coach, that head coach is fired and replaced another coach. The player still transfers despite the coaching chance, should player transferring count against the former coach or the new coach?
That's true, but when the topic about Maryland's transfers came up, it was more about what was going on with Brenda more than just the school. The count against one coach against the other is coming from schools like Georgia Tech and UNC that are still having players transfer out despite the coaching changes. To be fair, Coach Banghart wasn't renewing the scholarships of 3 of 5 players who entered the transfer portal this season.Not really clear on the question. Why does it have to “count against” one coach or the other? A student-athlete transfers from a school, not a coach.
The NCAA already announced that they are unlikely to grant additional eligibility to current seniors.I've other questions. If the NCAA allows seniors to return for one more season, can that senior then transfer and play for another team after one year? If The NCAA allows for a one time transfer without penalty, can that returning senior then transfer without penalty?
In other words, "Should Evina's transfer out of TN count against Holly or Kelly?"I have a question. If a player enters the transfer portal under one head coach, that head coach is fired and replaced another coach. The player still transfers despite the coaching chance, should player transferring count against the former coach or the new coach?
Official word re: eligibility relief for winter and spring sports athletes is likely to be announced tomorrow by the NCAA.The NCAA already announced that they are unlikely to grant additional eligibility to current seniors.
If they allowed the current seniors (in winter sports) another year of eligibility it would completely change the landscape for the coming season in women’s college basketball and the WNBA since most of the drafted players were seniors. I wonder which of the players with serious WNBA or overseas potential would actually return. Imagine Oregon, Baylor, or South Carolina with their respective seniors back. It was also give the highest profile players another bargaining chip if they could threaten to return if they don’t like the potential offers they are hearing to enter the draft.Official word re: eligibility relief for winter and spring sports athletes is likely to be announced tomorrow by the NCAA.
If they allowed the current seniors (in winter sports) another year of eligibility it would completely change the landscape for the coming season in women’s college basketball and the WNBA since most of the drafted players were seniors. I wonder which of the players with serious WNBA or overseas potential would actually return. Imagine Oregon, Baylor, or South Carolina with their respective seniors back. It was also give the highest profile players another bargaining chip if they could threaten to return if they don’t like the potential offers they are hearing to enter the draft.
Sorry.You could've asked that question without quoting my question. I got a notification and assumed it was a answer to my question.
My daughter is covered with tats. Instead of wedding rings, she and hubby had tats on their fingers, a true sign of commitment. I am not a fan. It still strikes me as generic art, however original, and, as an evolving human, what I liked at 20 might be abhorrent at 40, but styles change. I still cringe when I see photos of my sideburns from 40 years ago but it is part of how I got from there to here.Not for nothing, but by the time they are out of basketball, the head of human resources and the head of the company might have tattoos themselves. Not my thing, but then beards weren't our parents thing andshowing an ankle wasn't our grandparents' thing. Or am I dating myself?
Not yet IMHO. Not a good sign of course, since she was one of their 5* AA's on the roster, but they still have Green, Davis and Horston not to mention Key and Burrell. Not sure how much help Rennie, Kushkituah, McCoy or Saunders will be - but it looks like the starting 5 will be strong.Uh-oh! As Mickey Rivers once said, "The ship be sinkin' ".
This gives her a better chance of breaking the NCAA one season turnover record. However, they may still be a decent team.Massingale and Davis was their go to's (twos?) when UT needed a bucket. Now it's just Davis. The question is, what does Jordan Horston think of this?
What is J Horston’s best position?This gives her a better chance of breaking the NCAA one season turnover record. However, they may still be a decent team.
The exodus might be just beginning because Zaay Green has removed all of her TN photos off her Instagram (A social media service).Not yet IMHO. Not a good sign of course, since she was one of their 5* AA's on the roster, but they still have Green, Davis and Horston not to mention Key and Burrell. Not sure how much help Rennie, Kushkituah, McCoy or Saunders will be - but it looks like the starting 5 will be strong.
Not sure who they turn to as the PG - it's a rather large loss, even if they have a lot of talent on paper. Hopefully a few more jump ship. I imagine Horston will run the team next year, but she was a turnover machine this year. 143 assists and 134 turnovers. And she wasn't even the primary ball handler.
The exodus might be just beginning because Zaay Green has removed all of her TN photos off her Instagram (A social media service).