- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 34,881
- Reaction Score
- 104,614
That's interesting, and I think because he checked off all the boxes (individual accomplishments, championship, clutch, NBA success, etc) but to me it's ironic in that it encapsulates this entire argument: The definition of "best" is so vital, Rip is almost universally accepted but to me he's the least "outstanding" or I don't know, "spectacular" or simply, he'd NEVER be considered #1 by any standard, but he's top 5 by almost any standard.
I don't think that's fair...he wasn't bad for 2 years then have one good 6 games, which you didn't SAY but sort of imply.
And bottom line, this is the argument of "best" definition, because you use 2 guys you feel should be obviously unanimous, yet Kemba destroys them in team accomplishments. He has 2 , 1 ring, 1 MOP, etc they both have nothing.
Not trying to rip them, obv, Ray is probably my favorite player, but your reasoning and player analogies are really unfair to Kemba's career.
Fair enough. Only thing with Kemba for me is he was very inconsistent as a freshman, took half a year as a soph to become the player we expected but still struggled a bit. Had what was a miraculous Jr year and won a title which will never be forgotten. When you talk about PG's and accomplishments you also can't leave KEA to far out of the equation. I mean we have so many great Huskies not worth arguing over each person's definition of UConn greats. Fact is we should be in the Shabel, Roweand even Dim Porno era with some names too but most here haven't a clue.
All good, your assessment is spot on.
