That’s definitely what’s been insinuated but also we just signed Polanco to play defense at a position he’s played 1 game at his entire career. Now maybe he is more Dan Hurley and we sign someone else at 1B but if he’s the everyday 1B it’s a gamble on what his defense is like.So far it seems that defense and clubhouse are drivers for this years overhaul
Vientos to Dan Hurley , Baty, Lindor, Semien and Polanco starting and McNeil roving between OF and IF that leaves Acuna, Mauricio and Williams. I doubt they move Williams so its Acuna and Mauricio and I think maybe Mauricio gets moved - you're right we will see. Note I tried to edit this but it kept converting Dan Hurley to Dan Hurleylol sorry I realized when I put Dee H it makes it Dan Hurley automatically.
I’m curious to see how it shakes out. Right now for infielders we have :
Polanco
Vientos
Baty
Acuna
McNeil
Semien
Lindor
Mauricio
And Jett Williams waiting in the wings … feels like that’s about 2 or 3 too many. A couple of those guys have to be dealt right ?
Vientos and Mauricio seem like locks to be moved at some point with all the rumors, and McNeil has no role on this team so I imagine he's gone to anyone who will take that contractVientos to Dan Hurley , Baty, Lindor, Semien and Polanco starting and McNeil roving between OF and IF that leaves Acuna, Mauricio and Williams. I doubt they move Williams so its Acuna and Mauricio and I think maybe Mauricio gets moved - you're right we will see. Note I tried to edit this but it kept converting Dan Hurley to Dan Hurley
I think they still like McNeil's versatilityVientos and Mauricio seem like locks to be moved at some point with all the rumors, and McNeil has no role on this team so I imagine he's gone to anyone who will take that contract
Versatility doesn't have much value when you do a little bit of everything poorly. There's a reason they've been shopping him and nobody wants him. He has no role with Polanco hereI think they still like McNeil's versatility
Weaver is not better, Rogers has been one of the best RPs over the past few years. But he also got 2 years and $26M more than Weaver which I wouldn't call negligible even if I would have paid it.Question: Is Luke Weaver better than Tyler Rogers? The money and years are negligible and I feel like Rogers might be more consistent.
I recognize I'm overly critical right now, but:
1) Nimmo gone for Semian. Hard to see the overall gain for the next 2-3 years.
2) Alonso getting no offer and signing Polanco supposedly to play 1B.
3) Not wanting Pete or Nimmo paid at 35-36 but paying Semian and Polanco for less production at 35-36.
4) Devin Williams for Diaz.
5) Luke Weaver for Tyler Rogers.
There better be a really big freaking move coming to make this all make sense to me. Right now, we're just not better short term or long term.
I think that's premature but a fair opinion right now. But I'll also say that the bar to be better than last year's team is very low and I think they're already there even without other moves. By the end of the offseason they should be the clear #2 to the DodgersI guess I feel like this. If I’m going to lose Alonso and Diaz, I hope to feel better about the quality of team on the field in the end.
They’re not close to me feeling like that.
I think they still like McNeil's versatility