RadyLady
The Glass is Half Full
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2011
- Messages
- 5,643
- Reaction Score
- 5,062
I recall we didn't like this when it appeared that it was directed towards us. Why do unto others? It seems unsportsmanlike to meSorry, mods. Couldn't resist.
I recall we didn't like this when it appeared that it was directed towards us. Why do unto others? It seems unsportsmanlike to meSorry, mods. Couldn't resist.
they lost this game on Sunday night ... when they all jumped around like they won it all ... they acted like that was their goal ... if they won on a buzzer beater, I could understand, but I wouldve been disappointed in UCONN if we celebrated so much after a semi-final win ...
Congratulations to ND, because they beat us 3X and were clearly better than us. But I hope they have bigger goals next year.
I watched our game again last night, and sure there were some missed calls, but it was at least equal, if not slightly leaning towards us.So I guess you are another fan that doesn't think the way the refs call a game can affect whether a team makes plays when it counts. It takes a huge amount of mental toughness to continue to fight and stay focused when a game is being called so unfairly.
So I guess you are another fan that doesn't think the way the refs call a game can affect whether a team makes plays when it counts. It takes a huge amount of mental toughness to continue to fight and stay focused when a game is being called so unfairly.
Gotta respect ND for getting into the final game two years in a row. But I had to smile when McGraw said her team was handicapped by foul trouble. Live by the sword, die by the sword, Muffet. And I can't say I felt bad that Nasty went 0-11 from the field.
I recall we didn't like this when it appeared that it was directed towards us. Why do unto others? It seems unsportsmanlike to me
So I guess you are another fan that doesn't think the way the refs call a game can affect whether a team makes plays when it counts. It takes a huge amount of mental toughness to continue to fight and stay focused when a game is being called so unfairly.
But it sounds like there were comments made in the media and Muffet issued a clarifying comment which took ESPN to task:
"I am disappointed that ESPN would so clearly take my comment about Brittney out of context," the statement read. "I would hope that it was clear to those in attendance at Tuesday's press conference that my comments were meant to be complimentary, and in reference to her style of play and her dominance in our game, nothing more. Any attempt by others to read anything more into that comment is wrong, malicious and incredibly insulting to Brittney, Kim [Mulkey] and the Baylor women's basketball program, and it's a poor attempt by some to try and take away from what was a well-played national championship game. I have held, and continue to hold Brittney and the Baylor women's basketball in the highest regard and I congratulate them on winning the title this evening."
They said the same thing about Diana and she said she took that as a compliment.why the big deal ?I think Muffet should have been more careful to begin with. I doubt she had any ill intent, but it was poorly phrased.
Oh come on now! Stop with all this politically correct BS. Muffet was complimenting Britnney and ESPN was throwing gas to sensationalize the comment. ESPN should clean up its act.I think Muffet should have been more careful to begin with. I doubt she had any ill intent, but it was poorly phrased.
I love how "nasty" plays the game. She could be on my team anytime.
The game will be in Hartford next year. UCONN played at Baylor this year. we certainly lose a little more than they do (Hayes vs. Condrey, Field, and Palmer) but we also add MUCH more than they do. the game will be early in the year. it will be interesting to see how good our freshmen are by that time...Hope so...will probably be a close game. Huskies are going to need a finisher.
Well done, Muffett.Looks like there was a brouhaha over Muffet's comment on Griner . From an ESPN story:http://espn.go.com/womens-college-b...ifies-comment-brittney-griner-playing-ability
McGraw was asked by a newspaper reporter whether she has ever seen a player who can impact the game down low as Griner does.
She responded, "No, I think she's one of a kind. I think she's like a guy playing with women."
Griner responded: "I take it as a compliment."
But it sounds like there were comments made in the media and Muffet issued a clarifying comment which took ESPN to task:
"I am disappointed that ESPN would so clearly take my comment about Brittney out of context," the statement read. "I would hope that it was clear to those in attendance at Tuesday's press conference that my comments were meant to be complimentary, and in reference to her style of play and her dominance in our game, nothing more. Any attempt by others to read anything more into that comment is wrong, malicious and incredibly insulting to Brittney, Kim [Mulkey] and the Baylor women's basketball program, and it's a poor attempt by some to try and take away from what was a well-played national championship game. I have held, and continue to hold Brittney and the Baylor women's basketball in the highest regard and I congratulate them on winning the title this evening."
Love that last comment by DT.I'm sure Muffet regrets her choice of words given what has been said about Griner over the years.
BTW, here's a blurb from a USA Today story about Taurasi after the 2004 championship:
"Guys say 'D' plays like a guy. I don't know if there's a better basketball compliment," Connecticut coach Geno Auriemma says.
When Taurasi is told she plays like a guy, she's flattered but says the model needs to be updated.
"Growing up, I watched Magic and Michael, and I wanted to play like them," she says. "These days, I don't think you can say that anymore. I hope people will say, 'You play like Seimone Augustus, Alana Beard, Chamique Holdsclaw.' We don't have to use male players to hold women to a higher standard anymore. Women's basketball has come that far."
Because we didn't say it TO any players or within their earshot. It is only among fan-friends here. I would say it at home to my husband or to my UConn friends, but I would not say it in earshot of a player. So I think it is OK here.I recall we didn't like this when it appeared that it was directed towards us. Why do unto others? It seems unsportsmanlike to me
I think Muffet should have been more careful to begin with. I doubt she had any ill intent, but it was poorly phrased.