Perhaps this will provide a teachable moment, perhaps not. Ironically, both sides are using a common ground for their opposing views, denial of the timing and impact of Alzheimer's.
Despite living with and caring for my Mom with Alzheimer's for five years, I still missed the first signs with Cindy. The doctors assisted with this in denying she could have Alzheimer's at such a young age, yet even before the stage of seeing doctors there were signs that the advantage of hindsight uncovers. Now I can see that she had unmistakable symptoms six years before the official diagnosis. The stress events and real first symptoms likely occurred eight years prior.
I appreciate the opportunity Summitt provided us and her willingness to continue playing us when we were beating the top dog on a regular basis. On the other hand, ruthless behavior on her part would not be a surprise to me, she's not the angel her fans believe. Yet she never struck me as irrational, quite the opposite. Some of what transpired seemed too irrational to me. As for the innuendo "Geno knows," that is absolutely, wholly, totally consistent for someone with cognitive dysfunction who feels something they are incapable of explaining. I can't count how many times I've witnessed a deflection precisely like "Geno knows."
Is it plausible that UConngate (sorry, Kibitzer) was conjured up by a wholly ruthless and rational mind? Sure. Plus the common ground of assuming Summit to be rational enables fans on both sides to justify their contrary hatreds. Assuming the equally plausible condition that she may have been irrational due to cognitive dysfunction deprives the Tennessee fan of "just cause" for fueling their existing distaste for UConn, and the UConn fan of "just cause" for fueling our resentment of what transpired. Yet I encourage fans on both sides to at least consider cognitive dysfunction a possibility because it may make a difference in your own personal lives.