The ND spokesperson didn't say she's staying. He said, speaking in the present, that she's still a member of the team.
I interpret it that the spokesperson (probably the ever ND-sanguine Chris Masters) is saying that (a) as far as ND is concerned, and (b) as of right now, that's the case.
If she's not leaving, or at best in limbo, why is her status for Sunday's game "uncertain?"
Have been surmising they prevailed on her (they have leverage in the matter of her release to talk to other schools) to mull it over the weekend and not make any hasty announcement until she's done that.
And then talked with them some more. Maybe they make some promises addressing her (rumored, alluded to on ND board) grievances.
So I think the situation plays out a little longer. And if I had to guess I'd say she's not playing Sunday.
There's no doubt that Taya Reimer has something going on and there's a lot of talk as to what it could be. At this point nobody seems to have any clear evidence of what her issues might be. I hope that she isn't pressured by irrelevant media opinions.
JS, please take the following exceptions as meant with a touch of humor. I think your comments are generally in sync with the topic.
[The ND spokesperson didn't say she's staying. He said, speaking in the present, that she's still a member of the team.
I interpret it that the spokesperson (probably the ever ND-sanguine Chris Masters) is saying that (a) as far as ND is concerned, and (b) as of right now, that's the case.]
I’m not sure that this interpretation is germane to the discussion as it can be said of everyone from Notre Dame’s student assistants to Muffet McGraw.
[If she's not leaving, or at best in limbo, why is her status for Sunday's game "uncertain?"]
Well, let’s speculate!
I could offer that Taya Reimer might be handling a very personal matter as such. It’s even possible that Notre Dame respects her wishes. It’s also possible that Taya Reimer may not feel a need to explain or justify herself to even a single sporting news organization, bulletin board member or moderator, or resident of American Samoa who questions, ventures guesses, or starts a rumor about her.
[Have been surmising they prevailed on her (they have leverage in the matter of her release to talk to other schools) to mull it over the weekend and not make any hasty announcement until she's done that.
And then talked with them some more. Maybe they make some promises addressing her (rumored, alluded to on ND board) grievances.]
Or offered her candy, or threatened her dog, or engaged in even more avoidable speculation totally lacking supporting evidence… I don’t know for sure, but I’ve heard it suggested that Notre Dame could be trying to help her with whatever she’s going through without hoping to gain something for themselves.
My apologies...
[So I think the situation plays out a little longer.]
Well said!
[And if I had to guess I'd say she's not playing Sunday.]
Agreed.
Still, I respect the discretion of organizations like ESPN that have the patience to wait without putting a media spotlight on the matter. There’s little doubt that all will become clear soon.
Again, my apologies to you JS, your comments are not an exemplar of what I'm trying to address and I hope that folks on the board will forgive a bit of my cantankerousness on the subject. Certainly, boards like this one exist to promote unfettered discussion. I’m writing this largely with regard to the effect of rumors that grew out of Elena Delle Donne’s departure from UConn and the discomfort and fatigue she's said they caused her (Heard on car radio long ago -- sorry I can't source it). Although it’s still speculated about even now, the real reason for her leaving was not because of flaws in UConn’s program, Geno Auriemma, or a lack of personal fortitude, but an intimate one that I don't think should have been intruded on for the sake of a basketball.
Just my opinion... I know everybody has one.