And off glass.Only from 30 feet out.
Followed by...
you are allowed to use 'we' whenever you choose to align yourself with a movement or organization for an extended period of time. On the other side of the coin; I still remember walking the halls of high school after an away game and it was either, "Wow, we won. Great Game" or "I can't believe you guys lost last night." That attitude does not merit the use of 'we'. You must choose to be aligned regardless of outcome.At least we'll have a committed and capable coach with a well-built staff. And, btw, I question my own use of the "we" pronoun. You don't even need to question it. Just don't.
That PG defense was good but the talent on that team was really good.I guess he really liked Taliek. He told me during the 2003-2004 season that he thought the team could win the national championship not because of all the elite talent but because Taliek was playing elite defense on the other teams' point guards.
Agree 100%. My gut tells me we are going to be the surprise of the year in college BB. GUESS WHAT UCONN HATERS. WE'RRRREBACKDOOOOOMED!
Now 14 wins with what a few of you describe as a horrible disgusting coaching job and we can’t expect anything yet? I mean you got the guy you’ve been asking for and he won a lot of games with similar talent where he was so he needs 2-3 years? They basically have everyone back (let’s nit overrate Larrier please) and they’re a year more mature in body and game. Also he’s doing great things to prepare them for the rigors of the college game while adding a couple nice pieces including Sid Wilson. Sorry but for me 18-20 wins is the least we should see if he’s as good of a coach as it would seem. I know you’d prefer to sandbag his expectations so you could say “see what he did with Ollie’s team” when they dance again but I’m not having it.
I think he gets it done, wins a couple big recruiting battles and gets them back to our expectations in 1 year tops. He has enough to work with now, especially “if” Alterique is able to give him a healthy year.
Agreed.18-20 wins is a very reasonable expectation. All I expect in year one is substantial progress. If they play hard and smart and win 20 games, I will be happy. I do expect bigger and better things in years 2 and 3. I have full confidence in Hurley, I am just willing to be patient for a year or two to see what he can do.
And you want to set the bar high so you can say it was a mistake to fire Ollie.Now 14 wins with what a few of you describe as a horrible disgusting coaching job and we can’t expect anything yet? I mean you got the guy you’ve been asking for and he won a lot of games with similar talent where he was so he needs 2-3 years? They basically have everyone back (let’s nit overrate Larrier please) and they’re a year more mature in body and game. Also he’s doing great things to prepare them for the rigors of the college game while adding a couple nice pieces including Sid Wilson. Sorry but for me 18-20 wins is the least we should see if he’s as good of a coach as it would seem. I know you’d prefer to sandbag his expectations so you could say “see what he did with Ollie’s team” when they dance again but I’m not having it.
I think he gets it done, wins a couple big recruiting battles and gets them back to our expectations in 1 year tops. He has enough to work with now, especially “if” Alterique is able to give him a healthy year.
you are allowed to use 'we' whenever you choose to align yourself with a movement or organization for an extended period of time. On the other side of the coin; I still remember walking the halls of high school after an away game and it was either, "Wow, we won. Great Game" or "I can't believe you guys lost last night." That attitude does not merit the use of 'we'. You must choose to be aligned regardless of outcome.
Lastly, I expect WE will be great again!
MUCMBGA?Make UCONN MBB Great Again!
And you want to set the bar high so you can say it was a mistake to fire Ollie.
By the way, you make the same mistake a lot of people do. Talent is not enough. It has to be the right talent. The kid has to have leadership skills, a great attitude and be coachable in addition to having talent. And the kid has to fit the system. And you need the proper collection of skills. 5 great point guards won't go very far. You can't just say, "I want a top 10 kid, a top 10-20 kid, a top 20-30 kid, a top 30-50 kid, a couple top 50-75 kids and a few top 75-100 kids.". You have to get the RIGHT top 10 kid, the right top 10-20 kid and so on. Emeka Okafor is a great example of the right top 100ish kid. And wasn't Ray Allen top 30-50? He was exceptional for that range. And I think Hamilton turned out to be a great 20-30 kid. And Kemba and Khalid and so on. This is where Calhoun excelled and Ollie failed.
It will take 3-4 years before we know how good Hurley is at finding the diamonds. You can't expect great results until the class of 2019 (his recruits) are juniors. He was handed Ollie's kids, which may not have been his choices. And the culture was a train wreck. Ollie was handed Calhoun's recruits and a winning culture. Hurley's building job is closer to Calhoun's than Ollie's. I hope for a similar early UConn career trajectory to Calhoun's, which you seem to imply would be a failure.
@8893 and I have copyrighted that prediction but I remember mau agreed with us.He said 18-20 wins. That's about right. Certainly in the area.
It's not like he said 25 wins.
And you want to set the bar high so you can say it was a mistake to fire Ollie.
By the way, you make the same mistake a lot of people do. Talent is not enough. It has to be the right talent. The kid has to have leadership skills, a great attitude and be coachable in addition to having talent. And the kid has to fit the system. And you need the proper collection of skills. 5 great point guards won't go very far. You can't just say, "I want a top 10 kid, a top 10-20 kid, a top 20-30 kid, a top 30-50 kid, a couple top 50-75 kids and a few top 75-100 kids.". You have to get the RIGHT top 10 kid, the right top 10-20 kid and so on. Emeka Okafor is a great example of the right top 100ish kid. And wasn't Ray Allen top 30-50? He was exceptional for that range. And I think Hamilton turned out to be a great 20-30 kid. And Kemba and Khalid and so on. This is where Calhoun excelled and Ollie failed.
It will take 3-4 years before we know how good Hurley is at finding the diamonds. You can't expect great results until the class of 2019 (his recruits) are juniors. He was handed Ollie's kids, which may not have been his choices. And the culture was a train wreck. Ollie was handed Calhoun's recruits and a winning culture. Hurley's building job is closer to Calhoun's than Ollie's. I hope for a similar early UConn career trajectory to Calhoun's, which you seem to imply would be a failure.
Perhaps, MUHGA? Make UConn Hoops Great Again!MUCMBGA?
@8893 and I have copyrighted that prediction but I remember mau agreed with us.
And contrary to the accusations that we are setting up Hurley for failure that is the opposite of our history on The Boneyard. Certainly there is a danger that someone reading that prediction can use it as fodder if the prediction fails. And certainly some of the accusers who have made this assertion have been guilty of the process and believe everyone must be guilty of that behavior.
I believe that KO would have achieved that minimum win total even without a fan base support. So I’m quite optimistic about this season under this new direction and believe my chances of saying I told people I was right is greater than me having to admit I was wrong.
I don’t think that’s a high bar being set. The team last year underperformed for a lot of different reasons. In other words there is a thought that the team could not perform any worse which was a far under performing unit. The record was not reflective of their collective talent.And you want to set the bar high so you can say it was a mistake to fire Ollie.
By the way, you make the same mistake a lot of people do. Talent is not enough. It has to be the right talent. The kid has to have leadership skills, a great attitude and be coachable in addition to having talent. And the kid has to fit the system. And you need the proper collection of skills. 5 great point guards won't go very far. You can't just say, "I want a top 10 kid, a top 10-20 kid, a top 20-30 kid, a top 30-50 kid, a couple top 50-75 kids and a few top 75-100 kids.". You have to get the RIGHT top 10 kid, the right top 10-20 kid and so on. Emeka Okafor is a great example of the right top 100ish kid. And wasn't Ray Allen top 30-50? He was exceptional for that range. And I think Hamilton turned out to be a great 20-30 kid. And Kemba and Khalid and so on. This is where Calhoun excelled and Ollie failed.
It will take 3-4 years before we know how good Hurley is at finding the diamonds. You can't expect great results until the class of 2019 (his recruits) are juniors. He was handed Ollie's kids, which may not have been his choices. And the culture was a train wreck. Ollie was handed Calhoun's recruits and a winning culture. Hurley's building job is closer to Calhoun's than Ollie's. I hope for a similar early UConn career trajectory to Calhoun's, which you seem to imply would be a failure.
Nah, all net. Taliek swished it from about 35'And off glass.
Think you need the C in there, but it works.Perhaps, MUHGA? Make UConn Hoops Great Again!
I've got a great to Taliek Brown story from the summer of 2004 right after they had won the national championship. My son was just shy of his 4th birthday and I wanted to show him around the campus. We wandered into Gampel and sat down while Taliek worked on his outside shot with a grad assistant or team manager rebounding for him. I guess my son was vocal enough that they could tell that he wanted to be out there, and I thought that they might be getting annoyed by his desire to be out there playing with them. When Taliek had finished his work out he called us down to the court. He handed my son the ball lifted him up to the rim and my son dunked for his first basket ever.
I had forgotten about that until reading this thread. I'm thrilled to have Taliek back as a husky.
I’m an eternal optimist. Plus schedule is easier this year. Plus there was a Blaze strategy.Kevin Ollie was not going to win 18-20 games next year. It would have been more of the same, with some likely transfers (both out and in) and another losing record most likely. I have no idea how you could have watched this past season and believe he would have turned things around next season. The team was dysfunctional in nearly every aspect.
I’m an eternal optimist. Plus schedule is easier this year. Plus there was a Blaze strategy.
But rather than debating if KO could reach twenty, why, if your assertions are that this is all on KO, are you minimizing (relative to my prediction) next years wins considering there were no defections and having Hurley at the helm.
I understand his past history of turning programs around took two or three years but I don’t believe he’s starting at the same low level as was his situation in the past.
And great story about Taliek and your son.