Definitely over the 140 character limit.
Duke has had three one-and-dones since the 2010-11 season and during that time the Blue Devils are 2-3 in the NCAA Tournament with those players
No need for the teenage reply--I think there is some reasonable validity to what I said.
Maybe not directly, but he certainly was the fuse to the AO Tnt. And that is the risk of a 1 and done. You open the door for a guy who has been waiting his turn to drop down in the hierarchy to a freshman. It can splinter a team.
I take full responsibility for accidentally directing this thread towards AO bashing. Best to lock it now, its only going to get worse from here.
LOL. You're on your own if you do!I promise not to chime in!![]()
You do want to get the best players that fit your system. I'm sure KO is on that. But in our rather successful history, our championships and our other great seasons have ALL been built on players who have stayed 3 and 4 years. Kentucky has a model where they end up getting 6-7 of these guys at a time and usually have 2-3 top notch guys who do stay. I do not see us like that--nor would I want our program to turn into that. I like what weve had over the years. You get to watch the players and teams grow and develop. I can see using a player to augment a year is fine--if that is what we are doing here--thats cool. But I would not want us to change our system and getting guys like Bridah Napier Boatright etc and winning big... is so awesome. It's really what has made Uconn a unique team for the ages.
OTE="intlzncster, post: 1088068, member: 56"]Actually that's funny
Yes and no Izzy. What all 1 and done's have in common, universally, is that you don't know exactly how they will gel no matter who they are and their mindset. To some degree you don't know know this for all players and teams, but it strikes me as easier to develop a chemistry from your core over the course of 2-3 years evaluate where your strengths and weakness are, and then go get role players to mask your deficiencies. I don't think its coincidence that outside of the 2011 anomaly (praise the gods for it) UConn's final four runs have been on 5 year cycles.Again, all one and done guys are not the same. There's no all encompassing statement or directive that requires their inclusion be an automatic detriment to a team.
Dumb thread
Thanks for explaining that. It seems that not much is learned from following Twitter so why bother following this crap.Don't think anyone answered your post. Those are tweets from anyone (not necessarily followers) TO Diamond Stone re anything. The tweets won't show up on his feed, unless he 'retweets' them. Which basically means he forwards them to himself (sometimes with commentary) and they appear on his feed. When people do this, everyone thinks the person agrees wholeheartedly with what was said, which is usually the case. However, people retweet idiotic statements too, just to laugh at them. In this case, Diamond seems to retweet everything, so his retweeting of Wisconsin supporters doesn't necessarily mean anything. That was long winded.
Consider yourself retweeted BY style!Don't think anyone answered your post. Those are tweets from anyone (not necessarily followers) TO Diamond Stone re anything. The tweets won't show up on his feed, unless he 'retweets' them. Which basically means he forwards them to himself (sometimes with commentary) and they appear on his feed. When people do this, everyone thinks the person agrees wholeheartedly with what was said, which is usually the case. However, people retweet idiotic statements too, just to laugh at them. In this case, Diamond seems to retweet everything, so his retweeting of Wisconsin supporters doesn't necessarily mean anything. That was long winded.
Thanks for explaining that. It seems that not much is learned from following Twitter so why bother following this crap.
it is a man up violation
Having a consistent stream of one and done guys is incredible for program marketing and notoriety. The more big stars we send to the NBA, the more we'll recruit. The other key element in having more nationally watched players is that we increase our fan base in other states. Kids love the big time names and that is great for UConn. More merchandise sales and more value in media deals. I'll take every 5 star I can get for that alone.
This is heresy . blasphemy. While I think Stone would be great because he is the right kind of player - attitude and character wise, I am not hoping he's one-and-done. Drop the inferiority complex people. One and dones are not desirable. I personally like watching players for at least three years. I am not into rent-a-boy to watch him become a man in the NBA. I like watching players like Adrien, Price, Kemba, Shabazz mature and develope. I am not a Uconn fan to see it build a brand or gain notoriety or snatch big recruits. JC was a blue collar coach and our boys consistently out work, out hustle, out defend, and win more then the rest of college basketball.
It's not who we put on the floor, how they were ranked out of high school, or what they accomplish in the NBA that truly matters. It's what the players accomplish, how they grow and, and how they represent the university. High school star ratings and draft numbers are for other schools. We measure success in national championships.
this thread has become a dumpster fire
You earn a star on your forehead for maintaining self control regarding Alex. Is this the new Mau?I promise not to chime in!![]()
I disagree with you. It has not become a dumpster fire. It started out as a dumpster fire.this thread has become a dumpster fire