- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 415
- Reaction Score
- 684
Maria C. no doubt. I would like confirmation from another source.
Maria C. no doubt. I would like confirmation from another source.
The Tar Heels have also lost one of their 2016 verbals, as Jocelyn Jones has decommitted, per Prentice Beverly. (Don't want to embed the tweet because it includes a contact's phone # and e-mail address.)
If true, good.Well I'll discount it....just got wind Gray was blocked from talking to Tenn so I'm only assuming, but I figure it'll be the same for Mavunga.
Well I'll discount it....just got wind Gray was blocked from talking to UT so I'm only assuming, but I figure it'll be the same for Mavunga.
I have NO idea. I can only speculate at this point, I'm guessing maybe the DeShields fiasco. That's just a guess cause I can't see any other reason behind it.Why????
Ikr!If true, good.
I have NO idea. I can only speculate at this point, I'm guessing maybe the DeShields fiasco. That's just a guess cause I can't see any other reason behind it.
Is it even legal to exclude one school? It seems singling out one school is somehow unconstitutional.
To start with, all in-conference transfers for most conferences are 'restricted' in that they add an extra year to the NCAA year of residency before eligibility. And a school can put any other restrictions on a release as well - typically it is only a few schools that may have direct connections (recent coach/assistant hires from the releasing school, or a suspicion of tampering is the usual reason given.) And of course other schools have been know to refuse to grant releases - but that is not a good PR move for the team or the school.I think restricted releases are common- not sure how many schools are typically restricted. Indirect tampering could be common too.
That's my issue as well, even if she was not considering Tenn, she should have the right to talk to any school she pleases, ESPECIALLY after this fiasco.Tennessee is not one of my favorite teams by a long shot, but no coach should have the right to block a transfer to that team if a player wants to go there. Seems like there should be a rule change.
When the NCAA acts which is probably still a year away, they will likely grant free transfers to all athletes (including not having to sit out a year.) Until they act, UNC is still considered 'innocent' and is ruled by standard NCAA rules. And schools have always had control of how they grant releases. 'Tampering' is a pretty difficult thing to prove - so a school being able to specify a limited number of schools they will not 'release' is not that terrible.That's my issue as well, even if she was not considering Tenn, she should have the right to talk to any school she pleases, ESPECIALLY after this fiasco.
Remind you of anyone?Losing DeShields and Cooper to Tennessee has left Sylvia a salty lady.
I'm sure Mavunga will look at Purdue b/c she considered them first time around, they are pretty big on accepting transfers, and she's from Indiana. I think Louisville would hit a home run if they landed her b/c while they have recruited well, their up-n-coming stars are mostly guards and wings so Mavunga gives them an elite interior player, and they were considered 1st time around. She did consider Stanford and was reported to be a good (but not off the charts student), but transfers to Stanford are very rare.
She also had UConn as a finalist, and besides Butler, UConn doesn't seems to have a ton of true posts. IIRC, UConn recruited her pretty hard, so you never know. But wouldn't Mavunga to UConn be a major way of countering all the recent buzz at South Carolina.
I'm not a lawyer, but it is the NCAA... they do whatever they want, whenever they want. They even make up rules and apply them retroactively. Can't be more unconstitutional than that.Is it even legal to exclude one school? It seems singling out one school is somehow unconstitutional.