- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,659
- Reaction Score
- 15,374
Sort of feels like paragraphs taken out of a longer piece that touched on more material stuff before someone thought the better of it.Strange...
While it hasn't been made public that there was a settlement offer, I'm inclined to believe there was. With that said, I've really lost all respect for Ollie over the last 12-15 hours. I'm thankful for his time spent at UConn and the national championships he brought us, but to drag us through the mud when he very clearly violated NCAA rules is shameful. I will not cheer for him if he is welcomed back to Gampel or XL.
He could've done that by accepting a settlement offer and not dragging this process out publicly like he has. I don't get how people are now going to forgive him for this letter written by a PR firm.Respect him for the message. It may have something to do with damage control, who knows. Whatever--I'll take it. Thanks, KO. Hope we can just move on without tarnishing his reputation and our school's
Nope. Didn't say I'd boo, either. Just said I wouldn't cheer.You going to boo Herbst, AD Dave, and Calhoun when they are at Gampel or XL?
Was it written on a cocktail napkin?
C'mon, the departed's attorneys, PR rep, etc may have opted for something other than a cocktail napkin or iPhone screen.Slightly disappointed that it's not a screenshot of a note written on an iPhone
He could've done that by accepting a settlement offer and not dragging this process out publicly like he has. I don't get how people are now going to forgive him for this letter written by a PR firm.
I don't think Ollie is an awful guy. I just believe that if he was offered a settlement when originally fired in March that it was in poor taste to go through this entire process and make UConn out to be the bad guy.Forgive him for what? He didn't do anything that doesn't happen at any other major program. We're using these infractions to make a case because our AD doesn't have any money and would have had to keep him around otherwise. Ollie's biggest sin at UConn is just losing. Does Calhoun need to ask for forgiveness for his infractions over the years? I get what UConn is trying to do here to save a buck, but let's not pretend Ollie is some awful guy or was running some kind of scheme that's at all irregular in college hoops.
And the worst part is that this kind of stuff is NECESSARY to win in college sports. We've attracted attention to ourselves for doing what's necessary to win, and now the NCAA will be around and have its nose in our business to a greater extent, which makes it harder to win. No good program plays by the rules, and we've made it near impossible for us to circumvent the rules now over $10mm that we could have saved by not offering the extension in the first place. This all comes down to athletic dept mismanagement of contracts, conference realignment, and a program sinking like a lead weight with an AD desperate to do whatever he can to turn it around. It's worth wondering whether his choice was shortsighted because of the reasons I've just mentioned.
C'mon, the departed's attorneys, PR rep, etc may have opted for something other than a cocktail napkin or iPhone screen.
Forgive him for what? He didn't do anything that doesn't happen at any other major program. We're using these infractions to make a case because our AD doesn't have any money and would have had to keep him around otherwise. Ollie's biggest sin at UConn is just losing. Does Calhoun need to ask for forgiveness for his infractions over the years? I get what UConn is trying to do here to save a buck, but let's not pretend Ollie is some awful guy or was running some kind of scheme that's at all irregular in college hoops.
And the worst part is that this kind of stuff is NECESSARY to win in college sports. We've attracted attention to ourselves for doing what's necessary to win, and now the NCAA will be around and have its nose in our business to a greater extent, which makes it harder to win. No good program plays by the rules, and we've made it near impossible for us to circumvent the rules now over $10mm that we could have saved by not offering the extension in the first place. This all comes down to athletic dept mismanagement of contracts, conference realignment, and a program sinking like a lead weight with an AD desperate to do whatever he can to turn it around. It's worth wondering whether his choice was shortsighted because of the reasons I've just mentioned.
We're "using these infractions" because they are just cause under the contract and it would be mismanagement not to.Forgive him for what? He didn't do anything that doesn't happen at any other major program. We're using these infractions to make a case because our AD doesn't have any money and would have had to keep him around otherwise.
Disagree. In any event they sure didn't cause winning here.And the worst part is that this kind of stuff is NECESSARY to win in college sports.
His money? How do you figure? We are long past arguing that Ollie is owed the $10M. Long past.Classy. Let's stop the state-sponsored slander, pay him his money, and move on.
His biggest sin isn't "just losing." If he had been working really hard and got fired I'd feel bad for him but by all accounts he had just been completely checked out and off the rails for a whileForgive him for what? He didn't do anything that doesn't happen at any other major program. We're using these infractions to make a case because our AD doesn't have any money and would have had to keep him around otherwise. Ollie's biggest sin at UConn is just losing. Does Calhoun need to ask for forgiveness for his infractions over the years? I get what UConn is trying to do here to save a buck, but let's not pretend Ollie is some awful guy or was running some kind of scheme that's at all irregular in college hoops.
And the worst part is that this kind of stuff is NECESSARY to win in college sports. We've attracted attention to ourselves for doing what's necessary to win, and now the NCAA will be around and have its nose in our business to a greater extent, which makes it harder to win. No good program plays by the rules, and we've made it near impossible for us to circumvent the rules now over $10mm that we could have saved by not offering the extension in the first place. This all comes down to athletic dept mismanagement of contracts, conference realignment, and a program sinking like a lead weight with an AD desperate to do whatever he can to turn it around. It's worth wondering whether his choice was shortsighted because of the reasons I've just mentioned.