i give you all (well, almost all) kudos for some interesting, cogent opinions. some, i agree with wholeheartedly, some partially.
and some, i found absurd.
but regarding nika, in this thread i didn't once see any recognition of one of her obvious virtues -- she is the two-time reigning BE defensive player of the year! this is not a reason to maintain her starting position?
why does the BY discount the value of a player's contributions defensively and put such a heavy emphasis on scoring points. ya know, of course, that offense only comes about through TEAM play (as does good defense). paige definitely is an amazing offensive player, and she also has some great defensive abilities, which she could improve, as nika has improved her shooting).
nobody, i assume, claims nika can match paige's overall on-court contributions, so why do some BYers insist that nika must match up with her ... nobody does!
but nobody else is devalued because of this. if nika must meet this standard, then i can think of many players (umm, like any) who don't meet muster.
and nika and paige can play together. it's not an either/or situation.
nika , BTW, is a top-notch rebounder even when she is the shortest husky in the fray. this perhaps was brought up be a wise BYers in this thread.
she ain't no slouch offensively either, as her assists records last season attest. yet she is expendable because she's not paige? i must have missed it when somebody decided ticha penichiero didn't deserve to start ... ines can correct me on this.
BTW, nika can shoot, although furthers improvement and consistency would be nice.
remember, since she was a freshman, despite her flaws, nika has always somehow (magically?) been able to make the team play better (geno professed that, among his other nika accolades). and now she is providing great leadership.
so sorry if i've repeated others' observations.