Serah Williams Commits to UConn | Page 8 | The Boneyard

Serah Williams Commits to UConn

Status
Not open for further replies.
just watched the wisc games against Usc(20&7) and osu(20 &17) as I was interested in watching her against top competition
without getting into an evaluation of S W game
a few observations
- this is a very very good basketball player who is fundamentally sound on both ends
-Rebounds exceptionally well
-plays hard all the time
Play pretty much exclusively in the post for Wisconsin
-seem to have the athleticism and skills to play away from the basket
-Her overall game is significantly better than the current post players at Uconn especially on the offensive end
wisc without her, would have been a middle of the road Big East team
appears this is a perfect fit
Thanks for sharing this. One of ways Serah will benefit from playing for UConn is that she will have an opportunity to play away from the basket as well as in the post, which will boost her draft stock. In fact, Geno will insist on it. And if Serah's high post and perimeter skills are undeveloped, CD and Jamelle will rectify that by tournament time.
 
I think you need Azzi to step up and take over the Paige points and shot hunting and then Sarah adds a little more and then you need the Serah, Ash, and KK to hit the open shots they will get when everyone is focused on Azzi and Sarah. Azzi was a shot hunter in highschool and would put up 30 on any given night. I think her leadership goal has to be to get back to that after the injuries in preparation for the pros. This is her opportunity to grow with Paige moving on.

If by "shot-hunting" you mean finding her open teammates (and herself) for high % shots, then you hit the nail right on the head.
 
I would expect 14-16 points per game from Serrah, 20-23 points per game from Sarah, 18 - 22 points per game from Azzi, 10 - 12 points per game from Blanca, 10 - 12 points per game from KK, 10 - 12 points per game from Shade, and 6 - 8 points per game from Jana.......hard to predict the rest of the scoring since we don't know who's getting minutes.......as long as there are no serious injuries to Sarah, Serah, Azzi and KK, UConn will be just fine from a scoring standpoint.....
These per player breakdown predictions rarely prove realistic. Those ranges add up to 88-105 points per game.
 
Last edited:
These per player breakdown predictions rarely prove realistic. Those ranges add up to 94-103 points per game.
That's true but assuming that Sarah will average a bit more than twenty points a game, Azzi will score around twenty points a game and Serah will average fifteen points a game is not really a stretch is it? Now add ten points each for KK and Ash and look where you are already.......
 
Ok this is really a 5th grade math problem. UConn averaged 62.8 shots per game to equal 81.7 points per game. We would need to take 76.92 shots per game and still shoot it at our phenomenal .509 and .388 shooting percentage.

The simple fact is this WILL NOT HAPPEN.

i noted early in the season that only 3 times in the last 15 years have teams averaged above 90. Even mighty Tennessee and i’s frenetic play won’t come close.
 
.-.
Thanks for sharing this. One of ways Serah will benefit from playing for UConn is that she will have an opportunity to play away from the basket as well as in the post, which will boost her draft stock. In fact, Geno will insist on it. And if Serah's high post and perimeter skills are undeveloped, CD and Jamelle will rectify that by tournament time.
in the games I watched she was comfortable at the high post and not reluctant to shoot the foul line jumper She is pretty close to the finished product.
 
Yes it’s a stretch to say the very least.

People would be wise to consider what became of the bombastic predictions of 90 or even 100 ppg before last season.

I believe they averaged around 82 points per game last year.......
 
I don't have time to scroll through 6 pages so here's a video about Serah's commitment that I saw that might be of interest if it hasn't already been posted:
I forgive you. Know exactly what you mean. Twice, even 3 times is good.
 
.-.
I had imagined that Blanca had more of a guard's body -- like Juju. And that Ice would still be "bigger" if not taller. Is that not the case?
I had Blanca as a guard also. I was trying to show a lineup that Geno could use if he wanted to go really big.
 
Finally, another realist. Yes, we will be better up front (maybe now 20 ppg), and Sarah will get her 15 - 18 ppg, but outside Azzi (I'll give her 15-18 ppg, because she is going to be doubled every game), where do we get the other 20 -25 ppg we lost with Paige leaving?
Blanca, Morgan, Caroline, Shade, Jana, Ice, and Allie. There is no shortage of players who will supply the points. However, for some of the posters who are predicting an undefeated season or another NC, just remember SC, UCLA, and LSU are feeling the same way about their team. I think like ERWUC65: Nothing is given.
 
Here's another perspective - players come to UConn for different reasons, however if you want to win a natty, want to play in the W, UConn is a great training ground. And even if it doesn't work out in the W, look at all the alumni that are having success either on air, or with W & NBA teams. Imaging going through a season where players aren't playing more than 20-25 mins per game, there's less wear and tear, and Geno can implement a UConn style of what TN is doing, but with his typical sets and play calling? That's why Heckel might choose UConn. I'm betting that everyone knows exactly what to expect with playing time - you earn it.
I would think that if a player earns playing time by how they play in practice, certainly she would earn it by how she plays in games and KK and Shade have surely earned their playing time. Some of you want to hand the point guard spot to Heckel.
 
Those are people that don't know what they are talking about ! They are afraid to improve our team because it may take a couple of minutes away from their favorite players. If you want to compete at this level you have to get the best players available.
No, it seems that maybe you don't know what you are talking about. You get the best player available that fits your system. Latson and Fulwiley were two of the best players available but would not have fit UConn's system.
 
I don't need your advice! People can post their opinions without trying to put my down.

And if Kayleigh commits to come here, she's not doing so to ride the bench! She left USC because of that. Wise up!
Allie did not commit to UConn to sit on the bench, but she did. Neither did Jana, KK, or Shade. Have you talked to Heckel about why she committed to UConn?
 
.-.
I don't have time to scroll through 6 pages so here's a video about Serah's commitment that I saw that might be of interest if it hasn't already been posted:
There are several different versions of this online video on the internet that purports to outline UConn’s analytics based approach to recruiting Serah. While it is very interesting, it’s not based on any available facts.

These videos started floating around over a week ago, contending that UConn had already met with Serah and made this presentation, when she only showed up at Storrs for her visit this week. In addition, whatever approach UConn took with Serah, there is absolutely no way UConn would share those details with some nameless blogger.

That would be similar to a pro football coach leaving around Shadeur Sanders phone number so that his 21 year old son could prank call Sanders during the NFL draft. ;)
 
Last edited:
Definitely the best in March & April, but not in Nov/Dec.
Top 3 all year, finished first for the season, per NCAA

IMG_2951.jpeg
 
Last edited:
There actually is no argument. Fewest PPG allowed at 52 and fourth lowest FG% against. Plus the eye test. FF was a manual on how to play switching man to man defense.
Yup, the FF was a clinic. But the seasonal numbers were probably helped by the BE.
 
.-.
Top 3 all year, finished first for the season, per ESPN

View attachment 109175View attachment 109175
Thanks Nan. The numbers really tell the story this year. Having the best defense and best field goal percentage makes the best scoring margin a very likely outcome. Two numbers that jump out at me from these statistics that are going to change next year right away because of Serah are being 337th in free throw attempts per game and being 263rd in offensive rebounds per game. A sophomore season for Jana after a summer of training and skill work outs will also help both categories and the addition of Blanca, a slashing driver, is just one other factor among many that will help the free throws also.
 
Thanks Nan. The numbers really tell the story this year. Having the best defense and best field goal percentage makes the best scoring margin a very likely outcome. Two numbers that jump out at me from these statistics that are going to change next year right away because of Serah are being 337th in free throw attempts per game and being 263rd in offensive rebounds per game. A sophomore season for Jana after a summer of training and skill work outs will also help both categories and the addition of Blanca, a slashing driver, is just one other factor among many that will help the free throws also.
UConn was a perimeter-oriented, jump shooting team until late in the season. Not many opportunities for fouls
 
I like the way she uses the glass, even when straight on.
Very fundamentally sound player. I like the way she sets a pick, clean with no movement. I like the way she seals underneath. Just pro level. I like the way she can shoot a short push shot or jumper and how she runs the floor on a break. She has to be covered at all times anywhere from 15 feet in (even more at times). Imagine what that means for Sarah. If Serah takes her post defender outside that leaves the key open for Sarah. Who can cover her one on one underneath with her moves? If Sarah is being defended by a 4 outside, that leaves the key open for Serah underneath.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,497
Messages
4,578,584
Members
10,489
Latest member
Djw06001


Top Bottom