You mistook my statement of facts for a rant.......or you are deflecting. I suspect the latter.
OK..maybe I was off some...I conflated your post with that of gtcam in my replay as you can see...and I was really replying to his post
But...the truth is, with 120 plus teams that range from Alabama to UTSA...there is no way that they all will compete on the same footing.
Always...strength will be distributed on a Bell Curve and the bottom three quartiles have no shot to win a championship. Football, because the season is only 12 games, uses the season as part of the playoff...lose that second game and you are out...play a SOS of 80 plus, you may not get the credit of a team with similar wins that plays a schedule ranked much tougher.
Folks want the "appearance" of having a shot...similar to the illusion that we buy into in basketball. But lining a Camry up in the back row at Darlington is not really a shot.
Because of the nature of the game, basketball has the luxury of having a tourney that feeds an illusion of being able to compete although the data is very clear that it is, in fact, an illusion. Seeds #4-16 have, historically, not been able to move to the Finals. If you cut the tourney down to just four seeds, it would have no real affect on the Championship game. But you would forgo the egalitarian aspect and the illusion we love...that many have a chance.
I have made a lot of points in this discussion which are not addressed....the only replys seem to be "the G5 are disadvantaged to the point of not being in the picture when it comes to the playoff". Of course that is true and will be true until they expand to an 8 team playoff. And even then, an Alabama will blow away some G5 designee.