LOL, you just don’t want us to get anybody out of the class huh?Cut it out... yall got WAY too many PG's already. The pic below ain't a good look.
View attachment 89189
Does not seem that LSU players Morrow and Flau'jae mde the final Olympic qualifying roster.
Expecting a Duke offer for Hall any day now… since they’re also one of those schools that loves to offer players after SC offers.Is she a PG?
Expecting a Duke offer for Hall any day now… since they’re also one of those schools that loves to offer players after SC offers.
Olson is commited to Michigan. McMiller does not have an offer.LOL, you just don’t want us to get anybody out of the class huh?
FWIW, there are a lot of very good point guards in the ‘24 class and they’re not going to the same school.
Cambridge
Olson
McDaniel
Jones
McMiller
Harmon
Prince
.. and that’s not everybody. Most are still uncommitted. If you want a PG, this is the year to get one.
Definitely appears the Binetti plan is working,
I know, I said "most" are uncommitted, but the point of the OP is just the sheer number of good point guards in this class.Olson is commited to Michigan. McMiller does not have an offer.
I guess that's a no then. How about if the effort is there.Only if your trolling is humorous.
The $100k is a real thing. Also, SEC Football revenue is driving the NIL escalation for non revenue sports and a sport like WBB benefits. ...but Football recruits are not getting a $100k per year [most instances] if they are not elite. The whole concept of the recruting pitch-we will guranteee you $100k in NIL is problematic for all NCAA Sports in my opinion.
@GamecockFan 77 : In all honesty, its a real thing. The offers up to $100k being floated out by LSU WBB to certain elite players .Money does not have to come from school conf. revenue. It could be through the LSU Booster Club as you suggested or singularly from a wealthy booster. The $$ in the LSU model for recruits is not driven by a corporation coming in and saying, “we want you to represent our product". The product to reprsent is then found latr to justify the $100k NIL deal. That's the issue that I personally have with the LSU model. I guess this is the point I say alleged payments. In my opinion this is not rumor as I have heard a lot of reputable people close to AAU comment on this. As a thought-the comment by the Utah head coach who said specifically-we cannot compete with LSU NIL. What do you think she meant by that ?By rule, the SEC revenue can't be used for NIL, so it is LSU donors driving the train.
Let's look at it as it is: boosters paying players is the norm. It was obvious that is where NIL would go.
So no real need to shade the payments. The schools with the people who have the most money to light on fire will win.
I guess that's a no then. How about if the effort is there.
@GamecockFan 77 : In all honesty, its a real thing. The offers up to $100k being floated out by LSU WBB to certain elite players .Money does not have to come from school conf. revenue. It could be through the LSU Booster Club as you suggested or singularly from a wealthy booster. The $$ in the LSU model for recruits is not driven by a corporation coming in and saying, “we want you to represent our product". The product to reprsent is then found latr to justify the $100k NIL deal. That's the issue that I personally have with the LSU model. I guess this is the point I say alleged payments. In my opinion this is not rumor as I have heard a lot of reputable people close to AAU comment on this. As a thought-the comment by the Utah head coach who said specifically-we cannot compete with LSU NIL. What do you think she meant by that ?
I changed my mind. I didn't want to ruffle any feathers .
LOL, you just don’t want us to get anybody out of the class huh?