That would be the hope. If Rutgers can go to big 10, anyone can.
Issue is UConn doesn’t materially move the needle money wise. So, this would have to be a reason that isn’t money related (they like basketball, hockey, baseball, soccer etc).
When was last time a conference made a move that wasn’t solely about money?
Yeah, I don’t disagree, but I think you have to define what “materially moving the needle” means. The big 10 gets something like it $75 million per school in media rights and BTN distributions. For a school to “materially move the needle” they would have to bring in enough money to cover their share, $75 million, plus enough money so that every other school is enriched enough to make inviting them, worthwhile. I don’t know what that number is, but it certainly is something north of $100 million a year. That is an extraordinarily difficult row to hoe.
I do think that UConn is a good fit in a lot of ways in that we are a land grant university, in a populous area, that is academically a good school, with a strong research tradition, that plays a lot of sports, and plays them well, in an area from in a lot of big 10 alumni reside, with an extraordinary tradition in men’s basketball, and in unequaled tradition in women’s basketball. So, there is money to be had, potentially by adding UConn, a school with a good fanbase, that is passionate about the team, and with something like 11,000,000 to 14,000,000 people within 100 miles of campus.
That’s a lot, but, probably falls significantly short of the hundred million dollars plus, per year, that we would need to be able to bring in to make us a viable candidate. I suppose there is some slim hope that at some point the big 10 might need to expand and be looking for “partial share members”. There, I think the math might work for us.
Thee bottom line is, we are unlikely to go to either the Big Ten, or the SEC, but that doesn’t mean we would be an attractive in a “best of the rest” conference like the post 2036 ACC.