Rothstein on UConn | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Rothstein on UConn

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,579
Reaction Score
96,708
Polley has to rebound to play the 3 or 4 and get his 20-25 minutes. And if he gained confidence in his handle and getting to the hole then he will make a huge difference. His improvement in most everything except rebounding was evident last year, enough to think a larger jump is possible. People saying Sid gets little credit amazed how much negative stuff is here on Polley. He's long, he can shoot and he defends better than many here think. But hey I agree, needs to be more aggressive and rebound the damn ball. If he changes that he will play a lot of 3 and some 4 depending on the other teams lineup.

Again it's Rothstein but there are some exciting pieces and why not have some positive thoughts going into the season. We aren't far from hearing a lot more soon!
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,299
Reaction Score
24,053
When we needed a 3 desperately last year the offense set up for Polley. He was the number 1 option from deep if open and also looked good putting it on the floor. But he didn’t do it enough. I would like to see him assertive and look to score.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,024
Reaction Score
3,686
He'd need more than Kemba-like jump. His only good skill was 3pt shooting. And even that wasn't elite.
  • zero rebounding
  • not a good passer
  • couldn't create his own shot
  • Not aggressive
  • train wreck when he went to the hoop
  • at best an average defender. Too slight to D most fours and not quick enough for most threes. Could only guard specific players.
  • tweener who doesn't quite have an established position
He's got some potential, but it's gonna take a lot for him to become a really good player. He might do it tho.

I don't know what your definition of elite is but 39% from 3 for a college player is at least pretty close.

I definitely agree that Polley has some major gaps in his game but if people can't understand the value in having your 4 man shoot almost 40% from 3 in 2019, I don't know what to say. This team is not going to overwhelm anybody with physicality, they have to take the 2014 team's playbook and just shoot better than their opponents if they're going to be successful on offense.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,510
Reaction Score
94,377
I don't know what your definition of elite is but 39% from 3 for a college player is at least pretty close.

I definitely agree that Polley has some major gaps in his game but if people can't understand the value in having your 4 man shoot almost 40% from 3 in 2019, I don't know what to say. This team is not going to overwhelm anybody with physicality, they have to take the 2014 team's playbook and just shoot better than their opponents if they're going to be successful on offense.

Polley is elite at the single most important skill in the game. That counts for a lot
 

Dove

Part of the 2%
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
15,843
Reaction Score
46,152
Defintely not elite, but very good. 83rd percentile of qualified players on above average volume. Vital was actually elite last year: 92nd percentile on 90th percentile volume.
What now?
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
29,091
Reaction Score
60,514
I don't know what your definition of elite is but 39% from 3 for a college player is at least pretty close.

but if people can't understand the value in having your 4 man shoot almost 40% from 3 in 2019, I don't know what to say.
Polley is elite at the single most important skill in the game. That counts for a lot

I think to be an elite 3pt shooter you've got to be able to do more than be a spot up shooter. Have to be able to create your own 3pt shot. Bazz was an elite 3pt shooter. He could take it off the bounce and pull up. Spot up. Do whatever.

Was he even Top 100? Serious question. I've no idea.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,024
Reaction Score
3,686
I think to be elite 3pt shooter you've got to be able to do more than be a spot up shooter. Have to be able to create your own 3pt shot. Bazz was an elite 3pt shooter. He could take it off the bounce and pull up.

Fair enough, but you're not going to see that out of a lot of forwards in college unless they're lottery picks, which obviously Polley isn't.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
29,091
Reaction Score
60,514
Fair enough, but you're not going to see that out of a lot of forwards in college unless they're lottery picks, which obviously Polley isn't.

I guess my real point was that, as a spot up shooter, I'd expect a higher percentage. Giffey was 42%, which is more what I'd think of as an elite spot up. If he's creating his own three, OK, percentage drops a bit. If that all makes sense.

I edited my post above, but was Polley even top 100 in the country in 3pt shooting? honest question. I don't have any idea.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,024
Reaction Score
3,686
I guess my real point was that, as a spot up shooter, I'd expect a higher percentage. Giffey was 42%, which is more what I'd think of as an elite spot up. If he's creating his own three, OK, percentage drops a bit. If that all makes sense.

I edited my post above, but was Polley even top 100 in the country in 3pt shooting? honest question. I don't have any idea.

He didn't have enough attempts to qualify last year but he would've been 77th in the country. A lot of the guys on the list are playing mid major or low major competition so I think he did pretty well.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
29,091
Reaction Score
60,514
He didn't have enough attempts to qualify last year but he would've been 77th in the country. A lot of the guys on the list are playing mid major or low major competition so I think he did pretty well.

Just so this doesn't get lost in the mix, I didn't say he was a bad or even average 3pt shooter. I had him as a 'good' 3pt shooter.

I'm just having trouble considering him elite in that dept.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,510
Reaction Score
94,377
Defintely not elite, but very good. 83rd percentile of qualified players on above average volume. Vital was actually elite last year: 92nd percentile on 90th percentile volume.

I can get on board with this. Very good seems a fair description--especially since none of it is off more than 1 dribble.

I still can believe how many people insist Vital was a gunner/inefficient/selfish last year. Even just in conversations with friends. The kid was a dynamite shooter and goes to war every single possession. He may be a few inches undersized, but the kid is the definition of a competitor.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
29,091
Reaction Score
60,514
Defintely not elite, but very good. 83rd percentile of qualified players on above average volume. Vital was actually elite last year: 92nd percentile on 90th percentile volume.

Some people on here just spit out their beer.

And you said better than I did what I meant about Polley.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
29,091
Reaction Score
60,514
I still can believe how many people insist Vital was a gunner/inefficient/selfish last year. Even just in conversations with friends. The kid was a dynamite shooter and goes to war every single possession. He may be a few inches undersized, but the kid is the definition of a competitor.

1. I think people are still scarred from years 1 and 2.
2. If AG/Jalen didn't go down, Vital might not have hit the skids like he did, played within himself, and we all might have a whole diff perspective on his game/role.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,024
Reaction Score
3,686
Just so this doesn't get lost in the mix, I didn't say he was a bad or even average 3pt shooter. I had him as a 'good' 3pt shooter.

I'm just having trouble considering him elite in that dept.

I think the line between very good(or even good) and elite is really difficult too. I'm just inclined to agree with @husky429 that 3 point shooting is extremely important in this day and age, and the value of it can't be overlooked. Considering the bench options we have right now at forward, Polley becomes particularly important.
 

pj

Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,607
Reaction Score
24,971
I can get on board with this. Very good seems a fair description--especially since none of it is off more than 1 dribble.

I still can believe how many people insist Vital was a gunner/inefficient/selfish last year. Even just in conversations with friends. The kid was a dynamite shooter and goes to war every single possession. He may be a few inches undersized, but the kid is the definition of a competitor.

Vital will be UConn's all time leading 3 point shooter when his career finishes, which is an incredible accomplishment.

If Polley can win a starting spot on the perimeter over Vital, it will be amazing. I hope he's improved enough that such a thing can even be considered.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,330
Reaction Score
65,323
I think the line between very good(or even good) and elite is really difficult too. I'm just inclined to agree with @husky429 that 3 point shooting is extremely important in this day and age, and the value of it can't be overlooked. Considering the bench options we have right now at forward, Polley becomes particularly important.

Polley should be important as a stretch big for spacing and efficient scoring reasons. The problem is that he can't defend bigs or rebound. But he's a pretty good big wing defender. So really, he's not a stretch big. He's just a 3 that can't guard quick 3s. So we were playing essentially a 3 at the 4 and a 1.5 at the 3, and we didn't have enough size to deter people from driving and our rebounding suffered. Sid or anyone else not being defensively playable at the 4 was a big problem for us last year, obviously.

Akok & Bouknight should help fix those issues. Against teams with slow 3s (ala Cincinnati), we can play Polley at the 3 and be fine. Against teams with quick 3s, we can play Bouknight (or Sid if his defensive processing is improved). That plus Akok's general rim protection and 2nd year in the Hurley system should allow us to be a top 50 defensive team this year (we were 100+ last year).
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
590
Guests online
2,628
Total visitors
3,218

Forum statistics

Threads
156,880
Messages
4,068,734
Members
9,950
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom