No doubt it's unfair, but it's unfair because I'm hypothesizing a different game, not because it's not true.
In other words, with the 3 point shot in place, Jordan is the best ever, James is a top 5 great player, Oscar Robertson is a top 10 great with one of the most all around complete games, and Curry is the greatest shooter of all time and a top 20 player.
Without the 3 point shot in place, Jordan is the best ever, James is a top 5 great player, Oscar Robertson is a top 10 great with one of the most all around complete games, and Curry is a heck of a player who sure could shoot the long ball and, assuming further success, will knock on the door to top 50 all time.
You're not being excessively unreasonable, but just watch this and notice how few of the plays are 3 pointers:
Last edited: