- Joined
- Feb 19, 2014
- Messages
- 4,476
- Reaction Score
- 44,824
Trilly saying that is pretty big
They're in the ACC for all sports except football (independent) and hockey (Big 10), which the ACC doesn't offer. They can't join the Big 10 for football only, as an example.Explain NDs work around? I don't doubt you, i just know ND has avoided this.
At the moment the B1G is not looking at us. I think PSU will say no. Would I like the B1G, yes, however, are we going to wait until a blonde bombshell invite us to the prom, or do take a smart nerdy plain Jane to the prom?Big10 or pass
BIG is the goal. Big12 is the move you make now to even have a sniff at your goal.At the moment the B1G is not looking at us. I think PSU will say no. Would I like the B1G, yes, however, are we going to wait until a blonde bombshell invite us to the prom, or do take a smart nerdy plain Jane to the prom?
Plain janes in high school can become hot models in timeAt the moment the B1G is not looking at us. I think PSU will say no. Would I like the B1G, yes, however, are we going to wait until a blonde bombshell invite us to the prom, or do take a smart nerdy plain Jane to the prom?

SameNot a realignment student but have been hearing from Family in Denver a lot of CU/UConn buzz going around out there
I think there will be schools (like a certain big east basketball powerhouse that isn't us) who could be apart of conference realignment that don't even have a d1 football team. I think every school realizes the NCAA will end up dying and being a part of one of the big conferences in some way will be the only way to stay alive in college (basically pro) sports.I just don't see this idea of negotiating bball and football separately being successful. If you're a network, why would you commit big dollars to football if those same schools can end up in the winter and spring on other networks?
With ESPN+, Paramount+ and to some extent Peacock, becoming players in the scene and needing subscribers, I just can't see them bidding for rights unless every little bit of content is included in any deal.
Yeah but the ACC offers football, so how is it that Notre Dame can be a member for everything but football?They're in the ACC for all sports except football (independent) and hockey (Big 10), which the ACC doesn't offer. They can't join the Big 10 for football only, as an example.
This is categorically untrue. I've read countless scoops over the years here.
Me too. In a world with rainbows raining Lucky Charms cereal falling from the sky and cute dogs and unicorns running around I would like it ifIf true, I understand the logic, but I would definitely be sad. I love being back in the Big East.
Of course not. I'm still hoping for a FB-only invite.Is there a scenario where we join B12 without football? Seeing some of that on twitter, hard to tell what's real.
exactly. It's emotion versus logic is what it really boils down to. Read my post #193 above.I don't get how anyone can say this is a mistake. In a vacuum, do I think the Big East is more fun for us? Yes. But the writing is on the wall with future media deals, and frankly with the health of so many of our partner athletic departments who are small, private schools with no football program. And to boot, the Big XII is an objectively better basketball conference. I get that the geography is less than ideal, but how can you possibly turn down the opportunity to join the third best conference in the nation and make exponentially more money? It's not about thinking of what the Big East is today, but what it will look like in ten years.
Because they are ND and everyone wants them...so they can make their own rules. The ACC would rather have them in all sports and get a few FB games every year than not have them at all...kind of like the BE did for NDYeah but the ACC offers football, so how is it that Notre Dame can be a member for everything but football?
In my original post, I said they can be a member of the conference or independent. ND fits that definition.Yeah but the ACC offers football, so how is it that Notre Dame can be a member for everything but football?
I know, I get the why of it, but the poster said that it wasn't allowed by the NCAA.Because they are ND and everyone wants them...so they can make their own rules. The ACC would rather have them in all sports and get a few FB games every year than not have them at all...kind of like the BE did for ND
I certainly hope soThis board is going to be a literal cesspool once this is official
No I didn't. I mentioned the only alternative, which ND exercised.I know, I get the why of it, but the poster said that it wasn't allowed by the NCAA.
Yeah but Notre Dame is a member of the ACC for everything but football. You said that they could only be an independent in sports the conference didn't offer. Serious question I'm just trying to reconcile how that works.In my original post, I said they can be a member of the conference or independent. ND fits that definition.
Also, I may be mistaken, but I believe that carve out (being independent) only applies to football, because the NCAA technically doesn't control the BCS playoff.
Here's what I posted:Yeah but Notre Dame is a member of the ACC for everything but football. You said that they could only be an independent in sports the conference didn't offer. Serious question I'm just trying to reconcile how that works.