The the PAC 12 reaches an agreement to stay together and essentially spurns the Big 12’ advancements, doesn’t that signal the weakness of the Big 12 compared to the other P5s? Why would we want to jump to what could then be argued the weakest P5 conference and getting locked into that instead of retaining flexibility to see how things develop? If the PAC 12 GOR news is correct, that tells us what other schools think of this new Big 12.
1. The Pac will be the lowest paid of the P5, I'm fairly sure of that. Probably more streaming heavy than they'd want. Pacific time content just isn't worth as much and the LA schools were their main calling card.
2. Colorado will probably say no thanks and go back to the B12.
3. Washington and Oregon will have to make sure the GOR is short enough not to foreclose a move to B1G. 5-6 years.
4. As for spurned advances, it's just AZ schools and Utah. Utah has incentives to stay, b/c Utah State could be added. AZ schools looking at slightly less money, but more traditional rivals for them. In 5-6 years if UW and Oregon bolt, it will all back on the table again.
All of the ACC, B12 and Pac have weaknesses compared to SEC & B1G. The ACC is the least vulnerable, but is locked into its deal. That is both good and bad. The Pac is the most vulnerable, and the verbal GOR news is because
for the last year and a half nobody would offer them a TV deal. The B12 sits in the middle, maybe slightly more money than the ACC due to recency of contract, but the GOR is short for the same reason the PAC GOR will be short.