HuskyNan
You Know Who
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 29,651
- Reaction Score
- 268,640
You are right. We have a new poster Boom Boom and I think that got stuck in my mind. Ooops.I think she was referring to Bam Bam. Correct me if I'm wrong Nan

You are right. We have a new poster Boom Boom and I think that got stuck in my mind. Ooops.I think she was referring to Bam Bam. Correct me if I'm wrong Nan

That wasn't a pick. She was guarding the player at the time. Just wasn't letting her cut across the lane. (and sending a message)As to being part of the game or a cheap shot. It was both. Definitely a cheap shot but when you are playing on the court you need to be prepared and to protect yourself at all times. If you don't you can get taken out in one small shot like that and it costs your team a player. Maybe a key player. Her teammate should have been calling out the pick to help protect her.
.
I just wonder why many on here are not complaining as adamantly about the BYU girls thrown elbow?

Its become comical to watch these refs referee these games throughout the years. Its like every year the refs get worse!
I really really really wish there was something that could be done about it. If us fans see it and get angry over it, I could only imagine how the coaches must feel.
The refs have so much power to dictate how a game is going to be played, and to see them make horrible calls time after time is extremely frustrating.
My mind-reading capabilities are deteriorating with age, so I give the benefit of the doubt when I don't know the player. You may be right, but if Mariya tries to make a living doing that she is going to take some hard shots in the paint herself...another reason that would be dumb...She targeted the head. A smaller player running through the lane - her action of ramming the opposing player in the head was defiinitely on purpose. She was head-hunting. Just because rotating shoulder is common doesn't mean you can't head-hunt. She head-hunted.
I will add as a martial artist I would take issue with the rule as written...regarding the throwing of a punch or a forearm. Their are 108 weapons between the shoulders and the fingertips of ones hand. The shoulder strike is an actual martial arts strike used in Tai Chi, Kung and Karate. The video clearly shows that the use of Moore's shoulder was intentional... The result of the strike is undeniable.
I think a mixture of martial arts training could significantly affect the number of knee and shoulder injuries in the women's game......at least we know the team hasn't trained in martial arts to learn those moves.oh wait....
http://www.thecardinalconnect.com/t...-mixed-martial-arts-in-their-summer-workouts/
Personally I don't think either are, but please explain how one would be and the other not?Yep....she was definitely a thug![]()
I'm not saying that game wasn't physical.... BUT, when you adopt a flopping mentality like Baylor has.... you put yourself at risk. Refs don't know what to do when bruisers play floppers.That is why their "greatest upset victory" (against Baylor in the tourney) was tainted and bull ! L'ville was allowed to get away with it two years ago against Baylor so why shouldn't they continue to do it. If no further sanctions are imposed on them, then any future "agressive play" exhibited by L'ville is on the NCAA. Part of their MO.
Personally I don't think either are, but please explain how one would be and the other not?
Yep....she was definitely a thug![]()
I know it wasn't a pick but a teammate should be giving a heads up whether a pick or not. These type of crossings happen all the time in the game. The play was illegal and it was called as it should have been. But that does solve the problem of players needing to be aware to protect themselves.That wasn't a pick. She was guarding the player at the time. Just wasn't letting her cut across the lane. (and sending a message)
What? That makes no sense. At least to this situation????I know it wasn't a pick but a teammate should be giving a heads up whether a pick or not.
Why would Eaton's (if that's the girl, I don't remember the name), elbow be a Flagrant 1 and Moore's shoulder be a Flagrant 2?I think the BYU kid Eaton did, in fact, retaliate when she threw that elbow (which should have been a flagrant 1) but only after Louisville's Mariya Moore's absolutely vicious shoulder shiver, which should have been whistled as a flagrant 2 and ejection. I blame crappy, incompetent officials for letting that stuff get to that point. The same guy Joe Cunningham who "reffed" the UL-BYU melee did a game of ours in the Gulf Coast tourney (I think vs. GB) and he was downright clueless and unprofessional. Bad refs ruin games and can get kids hurt.
Why would Eaton's (if that's the girl, I don't remember the name), elbow be a Flagrant 1 and Moore's shoulder be a Flagrant 2?
The kid's a freshman in her first tounament and she did something stupid. Let's not get crazy. And she did apologize publicly - http://www.courier-journal.com/stor...kenzi-morrison-ncaa-tournament-game/25183113/What Moore did was tantamount to a battery- in terms of the manifest intent of the act and the harm done to Morrison (reported concussion). While Lexi Eaton's response to that prior bad behavior was assaultive and deplorable, it was a glancing blow and far less loathsome and damaging.
*The USA Today video of the "devastating cheap shot" is awful. Interesting to read Mariya Moore's published apology.
*I don't advocate litigating violent incidents between young athletes on the playing field, but prosecuting this act would be a slam dunk.
Perhaps you can, but from what I have seen on multiple occasions ( it wasn't just an exclusive use of shoulders or forearms either ) there is no doubt left in my mind about intent.FWIW, I'm willing to give Mariya the benefit of the doubt that she didn't target the jaw, and that's where I draw a distinction between a punch and even a well-placed forearm, that invariably target something.
Since I haven't seen her play much, I'll defer to you...Perhaps you can, but from what I have seen on multiple occasions ( it wasn't just an exclusive use of shoulders or forearms either ) there is no doubt left in my mind about intent.
You are correct! Every player should be held accountable for their actions, however we also need to remember that high school and college players are still young and formative. This is where the accountability of the coach's and those around them kicks in. Some players are naturally aggressive but that does not have to be a bad thing. Actually in athletics that is usually a real positive. The responsibility of coaches around them is to define acceptable boundaries that fall within the rules. I believe in this respect she has been let down by the people with that responsibility in her life. There was little accountability, in that respect. Rather they encouraged pushing the limit to what ever you can get away which seemed to have been the order of the day. This might also include those fans, officials and press in NorCal who closed their eyes to obvious red flags and instead reinforced negative behavior. Of course the term "Sport" which use to be synonymous with fair play, seems to have lost it's meaning and has instead been replaced with a win at any cost attitude via bending the rules till they break in order to gain every possible advantagemuch as we blame her, it still returns to Walz. He is quoted in the article as saying they've "dealt with it." REALLY? Did they take her to dinner to celebrate? Say, "Mariya, you're getting bad press so why don't you apologize" as opposed to benching the kid for a game, or AT LEAST, a half?
Should have been tossed.Is this play by Mariya Moore a Part of the Game or Cheap Shot
http://www.sbnation.com/2015/3/21/8...s-hoops-player-levels-byu-player-with-vicious