Playoff Bracket | Page 6 | The Boneyard

Playoff Bracket

Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
9,329
Reaction Score
31,080
CFP seedings:
1. Oregon
2. Georgia
3. Boise St.
4. Arizona St
5. Texas
6. Penn St
7. Notre Dame
8. Ohio St
9. Tennessee
10. Indiana
11. SMU
12. Clemson

CFP.jpg
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,468
Reaction Score
2,873
CFP seedings:
1. Oregon
2. Georgia
3. Boise St.
4. Arizona St
5. Texas
6. Penn St
7. Notre Dame
8. Ohio St
9. Tennessee
10. Indiana
11. SMU
12. Clemson
Disagree with the seedings and my machine has BYU in over TN but this is about what one could hope for.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
272
Reaction Score
1,459
Hoping Sankey throws a fit over this and attempts to tear it all down. Just want chaos.
Me too!

In the long-term...the non-SEC/Big10 teams will regret SMU bumping Bama...will lead to SEC/Big10 walking away or requiring guaranteed spots.

Let's be honest...this format was supposed to result in

4 - SEC
4 - Big 10
1 - Notre Dame
1 - Big 12
1 - ACC
1 - Big 5
 

ShakyTheMohel

Is it 11:11 yet?
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
8,048
Reaction Score
17,700
The issue is that the conferences are so big they can’t play a round robin schedule. Two teams in the same conference can have a significantly different SOS. Like Indiana and Ohio St.

I don‘t know how you fix that. To me…SOS should be the biggest factor in seeding.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
11,261
Reaction Score
18,326
God their crying is beyond ridiculous. They rank damn near every SEC team and never drop them out. This way they can go on about the "ranked" teams they have beaten, and also explain away any loss.
It's just hilarious to watch Sanky's, Saban's, the other SEC shills world is closing in, they think have the majority voice which it no longer is.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
10,892
Reaction Score
13,292
The issue is that the conferences are so big they can’t play a round robin schedule. Two teams in the same conference can have a significantly different SOS. Like Indiana and Ohio St.

I don‘t know how you fix that. To me…SOS should be the biggest factor in seeding.

I disagree. Schedule of strength is not what is always seems to be. There were a lot of SEC that were ranked high early, but ended up not being as good as advertised, but the teams that beat them early got the benefit of saying we beat a ranked team.

So my argument is you didn't beat a good team, you beat a team that was overated.

I think if you beat the teams on your schedule and they were solid victories, you did what you were supposed to.

The committee got it right. Sankey can cry about it all he wants.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
1,167
Reaction Score
4,811
My favorite is the Big 12 presidents scoffing at UConn, acting as if they're some football juggernaut. They only got one playoff team — a team that joined because of the Pac-12 collapse. Maybe they should take a look in the mirror and consider that Yormark might be onto something. This also begs the question: is the ACC really in jeopardy? They appear to be the superior/more respected football conference of the two by the selectees..
 

UConn Dan

Not HuskyFanDan; I lurk & I like
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
3,123
Reaction Score
12,652
My favorite is the Big 12 presidents scoffing at UConn, acting as if they're some football juggernaut. They only got one playoff team — a team that joined because of the Pac-12 collapse. Maybe they should take a look in the mirror and consider that Yormark might be onto something. This also begs the question: is the ACC really in jeopardy? They appear to be the superior/more respected football conference of the two by the selectees..
They only got two teams in because Clemson won. The conferences are about the same imo
 

Online statistics

Members online
356
Guests online
2,560
Total visitors
2,916

Forum statistics

Threads
160,126
Messages
4,219,323
Members
10,083
Latest member
unlikejo


.
Top Bottom