PAC 12 WBB News | Page 8 | The Boneyard

PAC 12 WBB News

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know the percentage but Arizona held them to 38 and knocked them off by 55. With every player on the team playing. Texas Southern is not good. I don't think Coach Cooper-Dyke has had much success in her coaching career, unlike her HOF playing career.
It was 23.4% while Arizona was a percentage point better shooting than CU was against TSU. CU’s biggest weakness is their free throw shooting. They outplayed Arizona last year in one game but lost narrowly when they hit only 11 of 22 free throws.
 
Well, other than missing nearly every free throw and 3 pointer and tossing the ball away about a dozen times, we did alright. Definitely the Cameron Brink coming out party - just wish folks with terrestrial television had been allowed to see it!
 
Well, other than missing nearly every free throw and 3 pointer and tossing the ball away about a dozen times, we did alright. Definitely the Cameron Brink coming out party - just wish folks with terrestrial television had been allowed to see it!
Brink missed 5 of 6 free throw attempts and turned the ball over 5 times but mads up for it by scoring 21, collecting 22 rebounds, blocking 5 shots and dishing 5 assists. Monster game.
 
Cameron Brink currently with 20 pts 20 rebounds against the #4 team in the country !
I didn't get to watch, but Mackenzie Holmes had been playing very well for Indiana this year and looks like she was kept in check, maybe credit goes to Brink for that as well.
 
Stanford FT shooting has been atrocious this year, and it's not just Brink. They've barely gotten away with it the last 2 games.
 
.-.
I didn't get to watch, but Mackenzie Holmes had been playing very well for Indiana this year and looks like she was kept in check, maybe credit goes to Brink for that as well.
Holmes had one great game against Kentucky. Pretty forgettable against Quinnipiac, was in foul trouble and finished with 10 points. Gulbe and Holmes were both terrible in this game, Berger also struggled the entire second half. I don't even know how Indiana stayed close.
 
Holmes had one great game against Kentucky. Pretty forgettable against Quinnipiac, was in foul trouble and finished with 10 points. Gulbe and Holmes were both terrible in this game, Berger also struggled the entire second half. I don't even know how Indiana stayed close.
Stats don't tell everything, but looks like Patberg and Cardano-Hillary were good? For Stanford looks like it was pretty much the Brink and Belibi show and not much else.
 
Stats don't tell everything, but looks like Patberg and Cardano-Hillary were good? For Stanford looks like it was pretty much the Brink and Belibi show and not much else.
Yes Indiana's guards (Patberg and Cardaño) pretty much carried them in this game, but both seemed to go cold in the second half as well. Cardaño's defense is very good, she is a total pest and got numerous steals and deflections, made it hard for Stanford to get the ball up the court. But once Stanford got into its offense it was either layups or putbacks.

Indiana's bigs just were completely ineffective on both ends. Berger is kinda puzzling to me, she missed several makable shots and then blew 2 FTs to tie the game in crunch time.
 
Well, other than missing nearly every free throw and 3 pointer and tossing the ball away about a dozen times, we did alright. Definitely the Cameron Brink coming out party - just wish folks with terrestrial television had been allowed to see it!
I did watch the game, and Brink missed a ton of shots in the first half, but was much more efficient in the second. For Belibi it was the opposite (to my eyes, anyway). At the other end, Brink was clearly a game changer every time Indiana tried to score in the paint. Just a monster defensively and on the boards.

Indiana doesn't have anything like Stanford's size, got killed on the boards, lacks the kind of guards that can give the Stanford backcourt trouble, and didn't get a good game from Berger. And yet. . . . they could very well have won this game if they had just made some open shots (mid-range+) down the stretch.

(Just as a completely irrelevant aside, Indiana looked exactly like the team I saw in Eugene--for the NCAA tournament--two years ago. Call it the Ali Patberg effect.)
 
I didn't get to watch, but Mackenzie Holmes had been playing very well for Indiana this year and looks like she was kept in check, maybe credit goes to Brink for that as well.
I didn't see the game but wouldn't be surprised if Brink is the reason she struggled. Cameron's an absolute beast defensively.
 
Brink just swallowed up Holmes whenever she got a post touch. Really impressive with how she played the angles. Holmes has a lot of moves in her bag but couldn’t do anything vs. that wingspan.

Is Haley Jones dealing with an injury?
 
.-.
The most surprising thing I saw in the box score was Stanford played 12 players in a 3!point win over a top 5 school. That is a commitment to building depth!
 
Brink just swallowed up Holmes whenever she got a post touch. Really impressive with how she played the angles. Holmes has a lot of moves in her bag but couldn’t do anything vs. that wingspan.

Is Haley Jones dealing with an injury?
Yeah, though not disclosed what it is. She didn’t play their last game and did not start today. She did play today though off the bench, but did not really seem like herself.
 
Well, other than missing nearly every free throw and 3 pointer and tossing the ball away about a dozen times, we did alright. Definitely the Cameron Brink coming out party - just wish folks with terrestrial television had been allowed to see it!
Was sad to miss this game, (as well as others as I just got back from a trip to Chicago). Happy to come away with the win, and hopefully FTs and turnovers can be fixed moving forward, as well as getting Jones back to 100%.

I'm so glad to see Brink getting extended PT that was missing last year, and taking advantage of it in that. I'm guessing this is the first 20/20 game since Chiney? By any means, impressive, and am looking forward to seeing her continued development over the seasons.
 
Watching Brinks play last season, I felt she might have been the most dominant player in the country for the time she was in the game. She looked like one of the few WCBB players who could carry a team especially from the post posiition.
 
Watching Brinks play last season, I felt she might have been the most dominant player in the country for the time she was in the game. She looked like one of the few WCBB players who could carry a team especially from the post posiition.
I think that’s true. Brink has star potential, and at times, star readiness.

She’s still not overly efficient from the field, she’s a turnover machine, and she struggles from the free throw line, but when Stanford needs production, she produces — points, boards, blocks, assists. She’s a finesse-style post with sensational defensive skills from what I’ve seen.

My only qualm is that I’ve seen her involved in quite a few plays that required official review for escalation — but even if she has some nasty in her, Stanford looks like a team that could benefit from some fire of late.

Consensus? Stellar forward/post that’s fast emerging as among the nation’s best.
 
.-.
She’s a finesse-style post with sensational defensive skills from what I’ve seen.

My only qualm is that I’ve seen her involved in quite a few plays that required official review for escalation — but even if she has some nasty in her, Stanford looks like a team that could benefit from some fire of late.
These 2 things don't really jive. I'd argue she's not a finesse player, she's fairly physical despite being thin.
 
Stanford 4-12 from the charity stripe in the loss to USF. Well below 50% as a team the last 3 games. Certainly Brink is contributing to that, but it's the whole team. Why is this such a struggle?

Stanford scored 54 today. 23 for Brink, 14 for Demetre...not much else for the rest. 9 (all on 3's of course) from Jump, combined 8 for the Hulls. That's it. No points from Prechtel, Belibi, Jones, Wilson, etc. Something is really not right with Stanford to start the season.
 
Stanford 4-12 from the charity stripe in the loss to USF. Well below 50% as a team the last 3 games. Certainly Brink is contributing to that, but it's the whole team. Why is this such a struggle?

Stanford scored 54 today. 23 for Brink, 14 for Demetre...not much else for the rest. 9 (all on 3's of course) from Jump, combined 8 for the Hulls. That's it. No points from Prechtel, Belibi, Jones, Wilson, etc. Something is really not right with Stanford to start the season.
It looked to me like Tara wanted the team to be less dependent upon Brink to start the second half, and it worked to the extent that Demetre and Jump made a bunch of 3's.

I assume that Jones is still hurt and/or rusty and that explains her lack of productivity points-wise at present. The player who is most puzzling to me is Lexie Hull. She's never been the most efficient scorer but she's always been good for more points (and sometimes big ones) than she's been putting up lately, and a fair number of her shots don't even come close to the basket.

Maybe the team's depth has become a minus instead of a plus?
 
PAC not exhibiting the dominance most of us expected before the season. Of course they may have the toughest schedule of all the conferences.
 
Huge shoutout to South Florida! Holy smokes! Caught a little bit of the game. South Florida is a scrappy team! South Florida is the definition of that expression "Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard". Huge win for that South Florida program. Congrats, Coach Fernandez and South Florida players!!
 
.-.
No idea what to expect tomorrow with Stan vs Maryland, I may email Brenda and see if we can borrow Owusu :rolleyes:
I'll make a bold prediction--a lot of missed FTs by Stanford. Can they even hit 60% in a game?

edit--I looked it up--hitting 55% as a team, that is absolutely atrocious. That number has plummeted after the last 3 games. Brink at 44% isn't even the worst on the team, that honor goes to Iriafen at 38%. At this point pretty much anyone other than Wilson, Jones or Lacie you don't want going to the FT line.
 
Last edited:
Overall a terrible day for the Pac 12. Ranked teams Stanford, UCLA and Oregon St. all lost, also Utah. Wins by Arizona and Cal, I think that's all. Covid saved USC from losing to Iowa. Poor offense seems to be a common refrain.
 
Overall a terrible day for the Pac 12. Ranked teams Stanford, UCLA and Oregon St. all lost, also Utah. Wins by Arizona and Cal, I think that's all. Covid saved USC from losing to Iowa. Poor offense seems to be a common refrain.
Don't forget the loss by Arizona State :)

UCLA shouldn't be ranked. It's clear they're nowhere near a top 25 team, not even top 50, at least until they can get some other players healthy.

Oregon State lost to a higher-ranked team, so not a big deal really. They have a chance for vindication against Notre Dame -- and they better make good on it, or ELSE :mad:
 
Oregon State lost to a higher-ranked team, so not a big deal really. They have a chance for vindication against Notre Dame -- and they better make good on it, or ELSE
Maybe NBD to you, but this was a winnable game and they didn't get it done. Their OOC is fairly weak, this and ND are really their only chances for good noncon wins, and they already let the first one get away. This is the kind of thing that can hurt seeding. Committee has already dinged OSU in years past, doesn't seem to matter that much how they do in conference.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,305
Messages
4,562,310
Members
10,457
Latest member
caw2


Top Bottom