cockhrnleghrn
Crowing rooster
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Messages
- 4,550
- Reaction Score
- 8,711
The University of NOT Carolina should be in deep, deep trouble.
The University of NOT Carolina should be in deep, deep trouble.
Wait. An athlete transfers seeking academic advantage? Alert the media!

Not quite OT. UNC WBB were among the student-athletes in the no-show classes and who benefited from unauthorized grade changes. About 6 percent of the student-athletes in the classes were on the wbb team.
This particular story here is disturbing on many levels and directly ties to WBB http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/10/22/4255051/wainstein-report-says-jan-boxill.html
ETA that it appears Jan Boxill is one of the nine who was fired or disciplined today. She is no longer listed as director of Parr Center for Ethics.

Not quite OT. UNC WBB were among the student-athletes in the no-show classes and who benefited from unauthorized grade changes. About 6 percent of the student-athletes in the classes were on the wbb team.
This particular story here is disturbing on many levels and directly ties to WBB http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/10/22/4255051/wainstein-report-says-jan-boxill.html
ETA that it appears Jan Boxill is one of the nine who was fired or disciplined today. She is no longer listed as director of Parr Center for Ethics.
I think the problem is that UNC has been investigating academic frog.
If they go with the whitewash, I could see a creative attorney and a few Alums threaten a class-action suit claiming the value of their degree has been degraded due to willful and purposeful fraud by the Administration. I don't have the expertise to determine if such a threat holds water legally...but I could see Alums from that time frame who took those courses (maybe honorably is some cases) raising hell over this.
I don't think the NCAA will do anything unless they have absolutely no choice, but I still think UNC is in deep trouble.
I read the lead article in the student newspaper. I hope the slant in what was written isn't indicative of the overall reaction of the campus community, though I suspect it will be. Minimalist in tone as to what happened. Without saying so, largely implies the fault lies with a rogue professor and his assistant. Sad.
Duke graduate + attorney = Obliteration of UNC's arguments.
I read the lead article in the student newspaper. I hope the slant in what was written isn't indicative of the overall reaction of the campus community, though I suspect it will be. Minimalist in tone as to what happened. Without saying so, largely implies the fault lies with a rogue professor and his assistant. Sad.
Well. Joey Kerns certainly has his priorities in order!“What’s important is that we kicked Duke’s ass at academic fraud.”
http://www.theonion.com/articles/re...lMarketing&utm_campaign=LinkPreview:1:Default
The Onion is a parody site.Well. Joey Kerns certainly has his priorities in order!
Oops - sorry. Hard to tell the dif sometimes in this caseThe Onion is a parody site.

Nobody can scoop the poop on a Tarheel better than a Dookie. Crazy like a fox.
Yeah... for 18 years.I read the lead article in the student newspaper. I hope the slant in what was written isn't indicative of the overall reaction of the campus community, though I suspect it will be. Minimalist in tone as to what happened. Without saying so, largely implies the fault lies with a rogue professor and his assistant. Sad.

There you go. Just look at how FAST the NCAA reacted shows you how bad calling a 7th grader was.Are you nuts? Academic fraud isn't nearly as repugnant as a congratulatory phone call to a 7th grader.
Thank you Mrs. Litella."Are they trying to say that there is parity between Duke and NC, or between NC and everyone else. I don't see how there could be parity when there have been 31oo students over 18 years and and other schools, like UConn have been penalized for...what's that? Not parity? Parody? Never mind.
Does this cast any shadow on DD's academic standing??
Didn't the UCONN men's basketball team get suspended from post season play for a couple of years due to poor academics? And the poor academics was not fraud but accurate reporting of performance in "real" classes. Someone else posted that UNC is the academic equivalent of banking's "too big to fail" scenario. Therefore it will be interesting to see how the NCAA handles this hot potato. Clearly neither UNC or the NCAA has been interested in getting to the truth. And as I posted earlier, ignorance is not an excuse for senior management of the athletic department, the teams, and the university. Lastly I would love to hear from the ACC regarding one of their prestige schools' actions!!!