OT: Stock trading | Page 194 | The Boneyard

OT: Stock trading

8893

Curiouser
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,848
Reaction Score
96,456
That's all fair. One thing I'll say is that I don't think there is anything cyclical about this bear market. I also don't think there is any reason to believe with any certainty that the major indices have to be higher in two years based solely on historical market returns. There is nothing normal about what we have been and are going through now.

I'm not suggesting that we throw the baby out with the bath water.

What I meant about being in new territory was that it's quite possible that historical trends may not fiit in a new paradigm.

I never suggested that we disavow 100 years of economics,

These are just opinions

Spot on, and that was the whole gist of my point in an earlier post
I agree that it is right to question all the assumptions. I just get a kick out of those who poo poo the people who have to make decisions about what causes will lead to which effects, when it's all guesswork.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,768
Reaction Score
85,215
I'm not suggesting that we throw the baby out with the bath water.

What I meant about being in new territory was that it's quite possible that historical trends may not fiit in a new paradigm.

I never suggested that we disavow 100 years of economics,

These are just opinions
I agree that it is right to question all the assumptions. I just get a kick out of those who poo poo the people who have to make decisions about what causes will lead to which effects, when it's all guesswork.
I fully agree that some of what is going on is fairly unprecedented. But then we've been through unprecedented changes several times in my lifetime. The stock valuation approach I was taught at UConn hasn't been valid for 30 years. It's all vastly different. The macro differences are huge. China wasn't an economic power not that long ago either, those changes and the internet were bigger than whatever adjustment is happening now. In some ways, the supply chain correction was long overdue. Covid exposed a vulnerability that needed to be addressed anyway.

So I'm choosing to expect that the bumps will be sorted out, some businesses will fail, some will rise out of nowhere, others will remain strong and shares of those will climb from these lows. Because the alternative is that you should sell your stocks, buy a cabin in Maine with solar panels, a windmill, a well, a woodstove and a crap ton of non-perishable food and hope for the best. I don't think a Great Depression level event is coming. Europe is somewhat FUBAR, but sanity on energy seems to be returning, if slowly. They've got big food issues though. That's another lesson they can learn from.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,685
Reaction Score
48,019
Watching professional traders on CNBC and one Bryn Talkington said the Fed has over 400 PhDs and they still don't get things right.
That's because they're constrained by policy makers.

The answer to overheating economy is not always interest rates. You can do a great many things. If it's too much credit in the system, too much in circulation, congress has the ability to curtail that in ways that don't require huge increases in unemployment. But that's not the world the Fed lives in.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
19,673
Reaction Score
39,109
What I've noticed is that a lot of people are very good at asking questions, i.e., issue spotting, but very few if any are good at answering them when it comes to predicting cause and effect. Seems we usually don't truly know the cause(s) until long after the fact.

Which is why it's called economic theory, not science; and why they are called forecasts.

If we are in unprecedented times, are we supposed to ignore historical trends? Take them with a grain of salt?

I don't pretend to have the answers, but it's interesting to watch the swings.
I would argue Economic Theory almost always works long term. Supply and demand, expected inflationary result from money supply expansion (too many dollars chasing too few goods), two negative quarters being recessionary, etc). Often when government intervenes it may change the timing of achieving equilibrium but not the ultimate results the theory expected. When I told people to be careful investing in the recent pages in this thread, the caution was all based on economic theory that has existed for many decades and recent corporate activity that one would expect to respond to these trends driven by that that theory.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
10,856
Reaction Score
13,077
That's because they're constrained by policy makers.

The answer to overheating economy is not always interest rates. You can do a great many things. If it's too much credit in the system, too much in circulation, congress has the ability to curtail that in ways that don't require huge increases in unemployment. But that's not the world the Fed lives in.

That's fiscal policy vs monetary policy. Our governments recenr fiscal policy decisions have put a strain on what the Fed can and can't do.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,269
Reaction Score
17,588
People were saying "this time it's different" when stocks were running from 2010-21. Others said "this time it's different" in 2008.

Yes, it may be different, but the overwhelming likelihood is that it isn't. It is only a matter of how long the current cycle lasts. If it is in fact different this time, it's probably going to be due to massive armed conflict or some other society-collapsing event(s), in which case it doesn't really matter anyway.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
232
Reaction Score
507
So you don't think purchases of existing bonds in the secondary market will affect the price of any new issues?
Who said anything about prices? The Fed buying bonds has always been about liquidity. Prices are mostly a function of interest rates.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
232
Reaction Score
507
That's fiscal policy vs monetary policy. Our governments recenr fiscal policy decisions have put a strain on what the Fed can and can't do.
This. Thank you. Debt, deficits, budgets, policy, regulation, how and why we spend the money are all functions of Congress. The Fed just does the best they can with the limited tools it has.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,269
Reaction Score
17,588
Who said anything about prices? The Fed buying bonds has always been about liquidity. Prices are mostly a function of interest rates.

I suppose his point was that restricting the overall supply (by buying up bonds on the secondary market) allowed new issuances to be sold at lower rates than they otherwise would have been.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,685
Reaction Score
48,019
That's fiscal policy vs monetary policy. Our governments recenr fiscal policy decisions have put a strain on what the Fed can and can't do.
If you want to tamp down the economy, you can also do things like end the Step Up in Basis. That right there will reduce the deficit, take money out of circulation, and people will keep their jobs. But there is little will to do that in Congress.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
19,673
Reaction Score
39,109
As I feared, any attempt at optimism the last 5 days, is quickly met with the reality you’re catching a falling knife. Be careful everyone, better days will eventually come, but not likely soon
.
C1BDB85D-7C2C-4532-A148-0955D124C459.jpeg
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,269
Reaction Score
17,588
Even if it's two years until it turns around, the perm-bears are still wrong . . .
 

StllH8L8ner

You’ll get nothing and like it!
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
2,131
Reaction Score
11,758
Even if it's two years until it turns around, the perm-bears are still wrong . . .
I’ve been buying in my kids’ UTMA accounts here and there. They can’t touch it for 10+ years so I have a nice long runway for Apple, NVDA, Amazon and others.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,970
Reaction Score
33,450
That's because they're constrained by policy makers.

The answer to overheating economy is not always interest rates. You can do a great many things. If it's too much credit in the system, too much in circulation, congress has the ability to curtail that in ways that don't require huge increases in unemployment. But that's not the world the Fed lives in.
Politics is always first.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
19,673
Reaction Score
39,109
Unfortunately, we are moving to new lows and each time the lows are lower. Be careful my friends. With our dwindling emergency energy reserves, we have less cushion for the likely energy shocks coming this winter. Not the time to be aggressive. First rule of investing, materially protect your principle. There will be better economic environments to make money down the road.
9980CECE-5716-4DC9-9340-AC9E4243F7DD.jpeg
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
19,673
Reaction Score
39,109
Now that inflation has been reported. Over-all, 3rd quarter earnings growth has been significantly revised down since July and earnings now will be the short term catalyst. This trend will more likely excelerate downward than stabilize or reverse over the next 2 months.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
19,673
Reaction Score
39,109
S&P500 down 21% YTD and 120 points before testing new lows for the year. That will likely come during 3rd quarter earnings and forecasts. It is ugly out there, be careful investing for awhile. I do think the next wipeout will be the floor with opportunities.
 

Online statistics

Members online
355
Guests online
1,888
Total visitors
2,243

Forum statistics

Threads
159,575
Messages
4,196,290
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom