- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 361
- Reaction Score
- 630
no but takes away the creditably of his claimsYou're right, this is about snitches. How stupid of me.
no but takes away the creditably of his claimsYou're right, this is about snitches. How stupid of me.
like i said, what is his beef...did he feel like he was cheated out of royalties for his jersey sales and likeness on NCAA basketball video games? he had a chance to actually take the classes... As much as i would like to blast UNC for this, i would have to say to blame the university for not getting an education, when they gave you the opportunity too, and then cover up for the fact that you didnt... he just seems like a punk. sorry don't like snitches, especially when they are just as dirty as the people they are snitching on..
no but takes away the creditably of his claims
During my decades of practicing law, when necessary because the message was factually accurate and damaging, the messenger was (legally) shot. I expect that the same will happen here - it's a very effective defense especially in the public domain.
maybe he's broke and cant get a job now. A legit college education from a prestigious uni sure would have came in handy....Not sure why people are so wrapped up on McCants motives. Obviously, it's people who have come up short in life that are going to blow the whistle. Those who succeed have little reason to go after the system that helped get them where they are.
maybe he's broke and cant get a job now. A legit college education from a prestigious uni sure would have came in handy....
I get the fact that academic fraud is a pretty serious deal, and how UNC is getting away with it is pretty mess up, considering what happened to us with the apr last year...however, after reading McCant's story, i put more blame on him for not taking advantage of the opportunity of getting the education, UNC tried to fake for him, which was the original point of asking, what was McCant's beef.. Either way, UNC has gotten away with fraud and i hope that they get whats coming to them..
I get the fact that academic fraud is a pretty serious deal, and how UNC is getting away with it is pretty mess up, considering what happened to us with the apr last year...
Wow. I just saw this. How can they not recalculate the APR in light of these revalations? I would think, minimally, the NCAA should:Whats not being said is during that time, UNC scored a perfect APR. What a complete joke of a system. If this happened at UConn, we would surely get the death penalty.
McCants was a kid, the people in charge of the AFAM studies department and the Athletic Department at UNC were not kids. He's now a man and as was said above, he'd probably like to have gotten an education. I'd be mad if I was him too. Sure he carries some of the blame but not nearly as much as UNC. Who really cares what the other UNC players think of him? Everyone always hates the whistleblowers, he's making them all look bad. That's why they require special protection.I get the fact that academic fraud is a pretty serious deal, and how UNC is getting away with it is pretty mess up, considering what happened to us with the apr last year...however, after reading McCant's story, i put more blame on him for not taking advantage of the opportunity of getting the education, UNC tried to fake for him, which was the original point of asking, what was McCant's beef.. Either way, UNC has gotten away with fraud and i hope that they get whats coming to them..
That's one of many reasons why the APR is a joke: phony classes don't count against your APR score.Wow. I just saw this. How can they not recalculate the APR in light of these revalations? I would think, minimally, the NCAA should:
1) have UNC forfiet and return all NCAA credits for the 2005 NC run. That championship should be stricten from the books
2) recalculate UNCs APR scores in light of the academic fraud with appropriate sanctions, including loss of scholarship, shortened recruiting period and, of course, loss of tourney eligibility.
3) have a finding of "lack of institutional control" and impose the death penalty, and
4) Williams needs to have a "show cause" retriction on him.
This is bad. Really bad. I think the NCAA loses whatever shred of legitamacy it has if it does not pursue this. If feel really badly for legimate student athlete at UNC. There is a now a presumption that the their degree is a crock hanging over their heads.
It would be nice to see the horde take it on. I can't understand why the haven't already.Mike Lupica made this exact same point regarding the NCAA and their nickel and dime penalties and is just waiting to see how NCAA handles this NC violation. Perhaps we can expect Lupica column or mention on this in NY daily News or ESPN sports reporters. You can bet the rats @ NCAA and NC are scurrying around ....luv it
Actually this will finally force Emmert's hand to investigate similar concerns at UCONN that he has had ever since his time spent here and thus free him from the perceived bias that he has for our programhttp://m.espn.go.com/wireless/story?storyId=11036924
I'm sure that UNC will be suspended from postseason play any day now.
Someone in this thread posted a statement about karma. I am a Duke fan/grad, but it sure seems like the NCAA got its comeuppance by sanctioning UConn, only to have Ollie, Napier, and crew win the national title the next year. Sounds like karma to me (not to take anything away from the efforts and hard work of Kevin Ollie, the players, and the staff).
The system starts long before college--this is what people forget. You show promise as a high schooler in the AAU circuit, you immediately get attention of handlers: some good, some not so good, none with your best interest truly at heart. Right then and there, these players start getting pressured to focus more on athletics and less on academics, and there's a certain logic to that: the whole idea that a player should have to attend college to be a great player makes little sense when you think about it. But regardless, many of these kids come from inner-cities with families that are themselves either fractured or uneducated and have no idea of how to protect their kid.
One their shuttled off into this AAU circus, they land at a school like UNC: but a player like McCants (obviously) would never have been able to get into UNC, and the amount of time they are expected to work on basketball means they really struggle to get the remediation they need...and because they struggle off the court, they know their only real chance is to further focus on sports.
It's exploitative to wrangle these kids in at such a young age, and make them go through these ridiculous farces that only enrich institutions, but very few care because a small portion will end up as millionaires, and a small but larger portion will be able to make a living off of it. And, for the select few who both have academic acumen and/or weren't caught up in the AAU circuit too early, there really is a meaningful college degree for them. But the Okafors (and others on different teams--every team has some) are few and far between.
So yeah, I guess all this ends with me agreeing with @Inyatkin : a player like McCants was caught up before he was old enough to really figure out what was happening, and imagining he was going to take Engineering or Biomedical classes or whatever rather than the sham classes is insane. Is there some culpability there--I guess, but am inclined to think it unimportant and an unrealistic standard to hold a young man to. The blame lay with UNC, and they should be punished severely.
This is key. There's so much emphasis rhetorically on a degree, but if you've got players going through some sham of a system thinking that the degree they earn is going to give them a backup after college, they're going to be in for a rude awakening. You need some skills to go with that, and a degree doesn't necessarily mean you have them.And, for the select few who both have academic acumen and/or weren't caught up in the AAU circuit too early, there really is a meaningful college degree for them.
I'd pixelate her, all over her face. I mean she's no Lois Griffin, but if she had a nice personality and no gag reflex, why not right?That NCAA investigator cartoon is kinda hot...
Frank06830 said:You can bet the rats @ NCAA and NC are scurrying around ....luv it