Plebe
La verdad no peca pero incomoda
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2016
- Messages
- 20,031
- Reaction Score
- 73,696
I didn't know soccer was so popular at Columbia University.
I didn't know soccer was so popular at Columbia University.
No! A 35 yard line, like the old NASL. Those games were exciting. A similar idea to the Blue Line in Hockey.Then you’d just have defenders living in the box.
Then you really didn’t play soccer/football. You played chase the ball and kick it hard. That’s how kids play.I played soccer on our mission team when I was a kid. I loved it! However, watching it is a whole different animal. I think I’d rather watch paint dry!
My favorite part of soccer is when they get within 10 yards of the opponents goal, then kick it back out to mid field, then kick it back to your own goalie. After a few more back and forth kicks between goalie and defense the goalie picks up the ball, waits 10 seconds for an opposing player to arrive and then punts it down field and out of bounds.No! A 35 yard line, like the old NASL. Those games were exciting. A similar idea to the Blue Line in Hockey.
Well Cornell has been nationally ranked and made the NCAA tournament a few times, just sayingYou can throw out the record books when Columbia and Cornell meet up on the pitch
Thanks for explaining my misguided youth. I wonder, does that logic work for other things as well? I used to love Wendy’s, now I can’t stand their food! Could that mean I really wasn’t eating at Wendy’s at all but rather at McDonalds? I’m gonna have to rethink my whole childhood!Then you really didn’t play soccer/football. You played chase the ball and kick it hard. That’s how kids play.
You can periodically cut away for a 3 minute commercial at random times and not miss ANY of the action.The problem soccer has always had in the US is that the action is too continuous, there need to be lots of 3 minute stoppages of play.![]()
Actually, we played ManU off the pitch.....and still lost. Happens sometimes in football. (VAR doesn't seem to help us much either.) Frustrating, but we are looking pretty good so far this year. We'll see if injuries or youth derail us.@meyers7 Man U put an arse whoopin on the gunners!
Why does basketball throw the ball into the post and then back out? Why doesn't just 1 player drive as fast as they can to the basket every play? Why do they pass the ball around the perimeter looking for openings, moving the defense?My favorite part of soccer is when they get within 10 yards of the opponents goal, then kick it back out to mid field, then kick it back to your own goalie. After a few more back and forth kicks between goalie and defense the goalie picks up the ball, waits 10 seconds for an opposing player to arrive and then punts it down field and out of bounds.
Cruel sport. You can dominate and still take a loss.Actually, we played ManU off the pitch.....and still lost. Happens sometimes in football. (VAR doesn't seem to help us much either.) Frustrating, but we are looking pretty good so far this year. We'll see if injuries or youth derail us.
Well Cuango not McDonalds but close.Thanks for explaining my misguided youth. I wonder, does that logic work for other things as well? I used to love Wendy’s, now I can’t stand their food! Could that mean I really wasn’t eating at Wendy’s at all but rather at McDonalds? I’m gonna have to rethink my whole childhood!
You can periodically cut away for a 3 minute commercial at random times and not miss ANY of the action.
Question: is it stupid that the clock counts up and not down? And because the clock doesn't stop, some number of whole minutes (remarkable that it's never fractions of a minute) are added to the game. Seems to me this is easily fixable, but it has never been fixed.
1) How would a countdown make a difference? It's a 90 minute game, plus injury time to account for stoppages during the game. The referee would still have to account for the additional time to make up the difference.You can periodically cut away for a 3 minute commercial at random times and not miss ANY of the action.
Question: is it stupid that the clock counts up and not down? And because the clock doesn't stop, some number of whole minutes (remarkable that it's never fractions of a minute) are added to the game. Seems to me this is easily fixable, but it has never been fixed.
Like life.Cruel sport. You can dominate and still take a loss.
Man I love this game!! Recently met a Britt of financial status. He is a very cool dude. He gave me and my daughter authentic West Ham Jerseys. My bro in law spend a few years in England. Came home with a Brighton FC tattoo on his arm.Like life.
Upon further reflection I think I figured out the reason why whole minutes, i.e. 5 minutes instead of 4:30 are added to the end of the game. If the score is 1 to 0 after 90 minutes, really what difference would accurate time keeping make? Sports that have actual scoring and action (basketball, football, etc.) would not tolerate this "relaxed" management of time keeping. But it's just fine in soccer.1) How would a countdown make a difference? It's a 90 minute game, plus injury time to account for stoppages during the game. The referee would still have to account for the additional time to make up the difference.
2) Players don't have the same visibility of scoreboards and game clocks like basketball, football, etc.
3) Not every sport counts time by the millisecond. In soccer, I'm not sure if using milliseconds would be of any benefit.
The fact they add time is accurate time tracking. They've accounted for the time lost during the game during pauses, (cards being handed out, injuries, etc.). That additional time can make a difference for the team trying to get back in the match. I couldn't count how many matches I've seen where it drastically changes because of the time added back into the game.Upon further reflection I think I figured out the reason why whole minutes, i.e. 5 minutes instead of 4:30 are added to the end of the game. If the score is 1 to 0 after 90 minutes, really what difference would accurate time keeping make? Sports that have actual scoring and action (basketball, football, etc.) would not tolerate this "relaxed" management of time keeping. But it's just fine in soccer.
Well if they gave 6/7 points for a goal and 3 points for coming close, then maybe the "high scoring" people would be happy???Upon further reflection I think I figured out the reason why whole minutes, i.e. 5 minutes instead of 4:30 are added to the end of the game. If the score is 1 to 0 after 90 minutes, really what difference would accurate time keeping make? Sports that have actual scoring and action (basketball, football, etc.) would not tolerate this "relaxed" management of time keeping. But it's just fine in soccer.


I wouldn't dismiss rugby. The physicality in that game in insane, especially considering there's little to no body protection at all.What is their alternative abroad? Cricket. Rugby. There are just way more exciting choices here - our innovations have led to plethora of choice. It's no offense to soccer...the MLS draws, especially well in the NW.
I am ambivalent about soccer in general except when following our National Teams but at least, the rules are comprehensible. Now rugby.I wouldn't dismiss rugby. The physicality in that game in insane, especially considering there's little to no body protection at all.
And for all the panning on soccer, that sport is an industry most professional leagues here would kill to be. When I see the transfer fees to just trade a player, I get lightheaded. They have to be doing something right.

I am ambivalent about soccer in general except when following our National Teams but at least, the rules are comprehensible. Now rugby.
The game must have been designed in a pub.
Reminds me of the finer points of golf
Not real good examples there. Baseball isn't much more exciting than cricket. Both pretty much have 2 people playing while everyone else standing around watching (while one team sits on a bench), until 1 person hits a ball...then a couple others get to play. I mean come on, Baseball is going to have Hall of Famers who sat on the bench for 80-85% of games (DHs). Not super exciting....unless it's just ingrained in a person because they grew up with it.What is their alternative abroad? Cricket. Rugby. There are just way more exciting choices here - our innovations have led to plethora of choice. It's no offense to soccer...the MLS draws, especially well in the NW.