Ortiz locks up HOF | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Ortiz locks up HOF

Status
Not open for further replies.
David Ortiz has had an interesting career. I don't know is he ever took PED's but judging from his stats one could speculate that if he did, it happened in 2003 when he joined the Sox. At that time his power numbers began to improve. However, again looking at his numbers, he may have stopped in 2007 when his power numbers began to decline. In 2008, which was his worst year, if it wasn't for Terry Francona's encouragement, he might have been released. Something happened again in 2011. His average went up, his power numbers stayed about the same and his strikeouts were the lowest of his career. He came to spring training that year much lighter and was a better base runner. I think, like many players, David Ortiz made some mistakes but IMHO he has been clean for a number of years now, is a good team player and a great representative for the city of Boston. What sets him aside from the others is his flair for the dramatic. He is a great clutch hitter and makes my Hall of Fame easily.
 
David Ortiz has had an interesting career. I don't know is he ever took PED's but judging from his stats one could speculate that if he did, it happened in 2003 when he joined the Sox. At that time his power numbers began to improve. However, again looking at his numbers, he may have stopped in 2007 when his power numbers began to decline. In 2008, which was his worst year, if it wasn't for Terry Francona's encouragement, he might have been released. Something happened again in 2011. His average went up, his power numbers stayed about the same and his strikeouts were the lowest of his career. He came to spring training that year much lighter and was a better base runner. I think, like many players, David Ortiz made some mistakes but IMHO he has been clean for a number of years now, is a good team player and a great representative for the city of Boston. What sets him aside from the others is his flair for the dramatic. He is a great clutch hitter and makes my Hall of Fame easily.

Or his improvement are a result of tireless work with Ron "Papa Jack" Jackson, Ortiz's first hitting coach with Boston. It was commonly speculated that Ortiz had a hole in his swing (under the hands), which went undetected in Minnesota. Also, Ortiz had many an injury attributable to the AstroTurf at the HomerDome while Ortiz was there.

During my tenure here in Boston, I was proud to be part of one of the most explosive offenses in baseball and Red Sox history. I am happy to say I was part of that. One of the most memorable things in Boston for me was working with the world-class hitters on this club, especially David Ortiz. Working with David and watching him train every day to develop into the player that he is today is something I will remember forever.

I am sure that Terry's decision to move in a different direction without me is part of the logical plan to help the team get back on track to another World Series which the fans, the guys on the team, and the whole organization deserve.
 
A-Rod admitted to taking performance enhancing drugs. A-Rod was also implicated in the Biogenesis scandal. Clemens was implicated in the MacNamee Scandal and by at least two of his former teammates. Bonds was implicated in the BALCO scandal, by a host of former athletes who used the Cream, and Clear and by the Lab's chief executive. Both Clemens and Bonds were formally indicted by the United States Congress.

How exactly does all of that compare to Ortiz?

Whether Ortiz gets into the Hall or not, he certainly has had his HOF moments. He's won the Edgar Martinez Award more times than Edgar Martinez. He's a 9 time All Star, a 5 time silver slugger winner, holds 3 records (Hits, RBIs and HRs) at his position and has been in the top 5 in MVP voting 5 times. He doesn't have a chance to cross traditional HOF Thresholds (3k hits, 500 HR), but his body of work, and penchant for the dramatic gets him some consideration.

Because he failed the exact same test that they did.
 
Because he failed the exact same test that they did.

What test that who took? I'm not implicating these players because of the 2003 100 person list. A-Rod admitted it. Clemens = MacNamee Scandal + Pettitte accusation+ Knoblach accusation + Canseco Accusation. Bonds = BALCO Scandal + take your pick. Read my post 3 up from here. Whoever tested positive in 2003 did not necessarily test positive for banned PEDs.

I'm not saying Ortiz did not take PED's, but there is enough doubt both ways that it could in fact go either way. I am of the opinion that Clemens and Bonds deserve to be in the Hall. They also deserve to have a big fat asterisk indicating their "suspected" involvement and role they partook in the Steroid Era. Same with a number of quality players from 1993-present.
 
A-Rod admitted to taking performance enhancing drugs. A-Rod was also implicated in the Biogenesis scandal. Clemens was implicated in the MacNamee Scandal and by at least two of his former teammates. Bonds was implicated in the BALCO scandal, by a host of former athletes who used the Cream, and Clear and by the Lab's chief executive. Both Clemens and Bonds were formally indicted by the United States Congress.

How exactly does all of that compare to Ortiz?

Whether Ortiz gets into the Hall or not, he certainly has had his HOF moments. He's won the Edgar Martinez Award more times than Edgar Martinez. He's a 9 time All Star, a 5 time silver slugger winner, holds 3 records (Hits, RBIs and HRs) at his position and has been in the top 5 in MVP voting 5 times. He doesn't have a chance to cross traditional HOF Thresholds (3k hits, 500 HR), but his body of work, and penchant for the dramatic gets him some consideration.

Good points, again I reject the need to measure a guy's greatness based on HOF as if it is a guilty or not guilty verdict.

With respect to PED's there are really very few Most Wanted Poster bad guys. Bonds, McGuire, Sosa, Canseco, Palmiero, Clemens and ARod are way out there as primary culprits.
After that a second but still very serious level of guys suspended from games, notable names include; Manny, Giambi, Braun, Tejada, Cabrera etc..
Then a 3rd level of admitted or known users but never suspended including; Petite, Brady Anderson, Ivan Rodriguez. With this group depending on the quality of their confessions or denials most people are willing to look past that. Probably no HOF quality guys on that list, but again who cares.

So Ortiz is in a 4th tier, guys with one rumor or alleged positive test, but nothing more. No question this is different than totally clean guys and could be a big obstacle for a borderline HOF case. But Ortiz isn't out of consideration like the first two groups and ultimately one or two 'maybe' steroid guys will get in before Ortiz is even eligible and at that point he's in a class of player that is not excluded, just loses a few silly votes.
 
.-.
True, but the HOF might as well close if they plan to keep such players out.

Let Rose and of the rest of them in, and include their full, but accurate bio.


The steroids stick is going to knock Ortiz out of any HOF consideration.

I mean, come on now...

He supposedly ended up on the infamous 2003 'list' and that's when he conveniently started whacking 40+ home runs a year - the guy is a nothing until he ends up in the Boston pharmacy at age 28.
 
No hitter in my life has come close to Ortiz in terms of big hits in October...no one.

Will end with most hits for Dan Hurley and 450 HRs.

No fair to say DHs are out...though they have to do what Ortiz did to overcome it. Are closers out?

Steroid issue aside...which means no one basically gets in any more....He is in.
 
Let me know when the steroid kids start getting in the Hall of Fame.

Until then, Ortiz is in the Hall of Guys Whose Heads Inexplicably Started to Grow Really Huge in Their Late 20's.
 
Let me know when the steroid kids start getting in the Hall of Fame.

Until then, Ortiz is in the Hall of Guys Whose Heads Inexplicably Started to Grow Really Huge in Their Late 20's.

Ortiz has always been a big guy.

davidarias.png
 
What will it take to get Joe Buck and Tim McCarver to stop stroking Justin Verlander.
 
.-.
A restraining order?
Not likely. Have you seen where the booth is in relation to the pitcher's mound at Comerica? Well over 100 ft.

On a side note, what a phenominal pitching performance on both sides. Lackey was in 2002 form.
 
The guy is/was a borderline case with arguments both ways ..... (Not even counting the steroid questions and voters who may not count him)

Think he locked it up last night with the grand slam in that spot....just an off the charts postseason performer. He is a walking Disney sports movie....

 
I'm not saying Ortiz did not take PED's, but there is enough doubt both ways that it could in fact go either way. I am of the opinion that Clemens and Bonds deserve to be in the Hall. They also deserve to have a big fat asterisk indicating their "suspected" involvement and role they partook in the Steroid Era. Same with a number of quality players from 1993-present.



Oh look what was recently posted on Yahoo.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-b...ain-tigers-jhonny-peralta-153829758--mlb.html
 
What are you getting at? Do you think Peralta is a HOF candidate? I never said word one about Peralta. In fact (and you quote me) I said that suspected and confirmed users deserve to be in the Hall, with an explanation of their involvement in the Era. The HOF is a museum of baseball. These emphysema having coffee addicted holier than thou baseball writers are the keepers at the gate. How much speed do they take to meet a deadline?
 
Red Sox fans are delusional, really really fn delusional!! LOL................the numbers jump out SCREAMING Manny and Papi juicing but there is doubt in their minds somehow!! funny !! hahahaha

2003 he suddenly goes from a hefty bag field to PAPI the slugger but there's still doubt in their minds........way too funny guys!!

Oh yeah then maybe ARod has an argument too!!:rolleyes:
 
What are you getting at? Do you think Peralta is a HOF candidate? I never said word one about Peralta. In fact (and you quote me) I said that suspected and confirmed users deserve to be in the Hall, with an explanation of their involvement in the Era. The HOF is a museum of baseball. These emphysema having coffee addicted holier than thou baseball writers are the keepers at the gate. How much speed do they take to meet a deadline?

How about grabbing a glove and wearing it to catch something then he's a given for the hall. Their not holier than thou they just believe you need to be a baseball player not a guy eating hot dogs while your teammates are making plays......the guy has been a great hitter since he juiced, a really clutch hitter but he's a Dan Hurley........there's no room yet in Cooperstown for Dan Hurley's
 
.-.
How about grabbing a glove and wearing it to catch something then he's a given for the hall. Their not holier than thou they just believe you need to be a baseball player not a guy eating hot dogs while your teammates are making plays......the guy has been a great hitter since he juiced, a really clutch hitter but he's a Dan Hurley........there's no room yet in Cooperstown for Dan Hurley's
Not denying he is primarily a Dan Hurley, but they only season in his career where Ortiz has not played in the field was 2008. He got hurt that year as well and did not play a full season.

The Dan Hurley has been a bona fide position for 40 years and the members of the BBWAA are not holier than thou because they won't vote in a Dan Hurley Primary. They are holier than thou because they are arbitrarily omitting 17 years from a museum of baseball history based on largely circumstantial evidence.
 
Red Sox fans are delusional, really really fn delusional!! LOL................the numbers jump out SCREAMING Manny and Papi juicing but there is doubt in their minds somehow!! funny !! hahahaha

2003 he suddenly goes from a hefty bag field to PAPI the slugger but there's still doubt in their minds........way too funny guys!!

Oh yeah then maybe ARod has an argument too!!:rolleyes:
A-ROD admitted use. Manny not only may have been on the 2003 list but has been suspended twice directly because of PEDs. Ortiz was also on the list, but has not been implicated by any other means. Is he guilty? Possibly. Perhaps probably. Doesn't change the fact that evidence against him is circumstantial.
 
A-ROD admitted use. Manny not only may have been on the 2003 list but has been suspended twice directly because of PEDs. Ortiz was also on the list, but has not been implicated by any other means. Is he guilty? Possibly. Perhaps probably. Doesn't change the fact that evidence against him is circumstantial.

okay now take off the red glasses and tell us the truth........lol........he's your guy I get it!! No issues...........whatever he's been doing since 2003 he's a great clutch hitter and there's no denying that.
 
okay now take off the red glasses and tell us the truth........lol........he's your guy I get it!! No issues...........whatever he's been doing since 2003 he's a great clutch hitter and there's no denying that.

I'm a realist. It is certainly a possibility, but here's the thing: I don't care. At the end of the day, I want to be entertained.
 
Whether Ortiz gets into the Hall or not, he certainly has had his HOF moments. He's won the Edgar Martinez Award more times than Edgar Martinez. He's a 9 time All Star, a 5 time silver slugger winner, holds 3 records (Hits, RBIs and HRs) at his position and has been in the top 5 in MVP voting 5 times. He doesn't have a chance to cross traditional HOF Thresholds (3k hits, 500 HR), but his body of work, and penchant for the dramatic gets him some consideration.

I'm sorry. As far as the Hall of Fame goes, I dont' know how something like a "penchant for the dramatic" is ever included in the discussion. I keep seeing things like October hits, clutch, big moments and I think that, as Red Sox fans? That's dandy. When being measured up against the greatest hitters of all time over the span of their careers? A handful of hits don't mean a thing to me.
 
Funny that you highlight 5 words at the end of the post. How about the 45 words that preceded what was bolded? That is what I mean by body of work. I will grant you that even absent the PED cloud, Ortiz is probably on the outside looking in to the "Hall of Fame (I.e. room with the plaques)," especially considering the era in which they occurred. However, his exploits should be on keen display in the attached museum of baseball history for all to appreciate.
 
.-.
He has 2 WS rings since 2000 as do the Yanks, Cards and Giants......how many you want to add to that new museum of yours for keen display? He's been "Mr October" to you guys as Red Sox fans, other teams have theirs!! He's a good clutch hitter, ends there! Can't run or do anything else!
 
Not denying he is primarily a Dan Hurley, but they only season in his career where Ortiz has not played in the field was 2008. He got hurt that year as well and did not play a full season.

The Dan Hurley has been a bona fide position for 40 years and the members of the BBWAA are not holier than thou because they won't vote in a Dan Hurley Primary. They are holier than thou because they are arbitrarily omitting 17 years from a museum of baseball history based on largely circumstantial evidence.
David Ortiz plays first base when the Sox are playing by National League rules. When is has played there, he has played quite well. I can remember a great play he made in the 2004 World Series against St. Louis when he nailed the Cardinal pitcher who had gone too far off of third base. So I don't think Dan Hurley's should be ruled out. I think a position player should get additional consideration but only if they are exceptional at their position. i.e. Cal Ripken.

Has Ortiz done enough to get him into the Hall? I think it is debatable. He has certainly been a clutch player but that is very subjective. Should he be denied the opportunity because his name appeared on a list in 2003? Absolutely not. If I was voting, I would vote for him but I admit I am biased. But then again, who isn't?
 
Red Sox fans are delusional, really really fn delusional!! LOL................the numbers jump out SCREAMING Manny and Papi juicing but there is doubt in their minds somehow!! funny !! hahahaha

2003 he suddenly goes from a hefty bag field to PAPI the slugger but there's still doubt in their minds........way too funny guys!!

Oh yeah then maybe ARod has an argument too!!:rolleyes:

So you are saying Manny started juicing in 2003 and the numbers prove that? Even for a putz this a moronic statement.

Not saying Manny did not juice, but come on at least put together an accurate argument. His numbers were fantastic throughout his career, there nothing you can point to say hey here is when he started. Much like Arod and Pujols.
 
He has 2 WS rings since 2000 as do the Yanks, Cards and Giants......how many you want to add to that new museum of yours for keen display? He's been "Mr October" to you guys as Red Sox fans, other teams have theirs!! He's a good clutch hitter, ends there! Can't run or do anything else!

What new Museum? The official title of the Hall of Fame is, "The National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum." It's old. The Hall of Fame is merely the room where the plaques are hung. The rest is a museum.

Ortiz has earned two WS Rings since 2004 but that has nothing to do with it. Championship titles are team achievements, not individual. Otherwise Fisk, Teddy Ball Game, Yaz, and Rice, among others would not be in the Hall of Fame. Many players can't run and most Hall of Famers are there for what they do at the plate. Some players do not belong in the Hall at all but are still there. Many are voted in by the Veterans' committee, which is probably Ortiz's way in as well...if they deem him worthy in 31 or so years.

Maybe there should be a mechanism where the number of enshrinees is capped, and a current player has to knock a former out of the Hall. That would be great drama...
 
So you are saying Manny started juicing in 2003 and the numbers prove that? Even for a putz this a moronic statement.

Not saying Manny did not juice, but come on at least put together an accurate argument. His numbers were fantastic throughout his career, there nothing you can point to say hey here is when he started. Much like Arod and Pujols.

No you dumb**........I somehow knew you would chime in with some "WTF" stuff but at least you are consistent - stupid but consistently so!!

Manny started in Cleveland more than likely and Papi didn't until he became Manny's protector........can you read dopey? Don't wast cyber space Jer, unlike Waq, Husky25, GO and 60's you don't have enough baseball knowledge to even be here!
 
No you dumb* ........I somehow knew you would chime in with some "WTF" stuff but at least you are consistent - stupid but consistently so!!

Manny started in Cleveland more than likely and Papi didn't until he became Manny's protector........can you read dopey? Don't wast cyber space Jer, unlike Waq, Husky25, GO and 60's you don't have enough baseball knowledge to even be here!

Not only do you write like a child, but you make the dumbest posts on this board. Use inteligible sentences, I know that is tough for you because then you would not be able to use emoticons, but people might have a clue what you are trying to say. You said look at the numbers? What numbers for Manny? Where is the year you can say he started???

I love how you think you are a baseball wizard but a quick review of your posts show the complete opposite.

Oh and glad you came back after crying for attention earlier:

http://the-boneyard.com/threads/good-luck-guys.43995/

http://the-boneyard.com/threads/alomst-gone.44043/#post-696049

Could you be any more desperate for people to pay attention to you? You could not be more stereotypical of someone who has 5k posts on a message board and a chick who would never look at them as their avatar. Carry on Mau, we all enjoy your verbal diarrhea.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,640
Messages
4,587,386
Members
10,497
Latest member
Orlando Fos


Top Bottom