Only if every coach is defined as Rick Pitino, John Calipari and other coaches that committed NCAA violations. In terms of other every coaches I think we'd need to review the contract of each, the records and the day-to-day job performance.
The difference YOU and your ilk fail to understand and willfully ignore is that the vast majority of coaches that get fired are at least trying to do their job AND not violating their contracts, so therefore they get paid. Ollie wasn't and therefore didn't.
I don't know but I'd guess Chris Mullin would be a better bad coach comp for you. He wasn't doing his job, admitted as much and resigned with some integrity. I assume he therefore wasn't paid for the remaining contract. I'd guess he probably got some good faith separation payment out of goodwill and b/c he did the right thing by resigning.
Every big time coach/program pays for players. The only shocking thing is how bad they were at it and apparently hiding it once Calhoun gave the reigns to Ollie and company. Clown Car.
So I am guessing you think it happened. I am not saying KO or Uconn are above such tactics. But to pay 30K for a 1 year transfer from Cornell? I would be shocked if it were true.Every big time coach/program pays for players. The only shocking thing is how bad they were at it and apparently hiding it once Calhoun gave the reigns to Ollie and company. Clown Car.
I’ve enjoyed everyone cheering on Miller while they ignore this accusation.
Does anyone think this is true - 30k seems to buy better players than Miller.
So I am guessing you think it happened. I am not saying KO or Uconn are above such tactics. But to pay 30K for a 1 year transfer from Cornell? I would be shocked if it were true.
Because 30 grand buys a lot more than Shonn Miller. Please-like my old personal add said...serious replies only.Yeah show me something KO has handled well.
Why? KO hates recruiting pay money makes recruiting easier...
There is hypocrisy in college athletics? You are kidding me. Your arguments don't make sense especially in a court of law. 'Everyone else does it' and 'but he did it first' may work with your mommy, but not your boss.Have you paid any attention whatsoever to what's going on in college basketball.
Coach K., Roy Williams, Miller in Arizona, Self at Kansas, all these and more have committed much more egregious offenses than Ollie sending players to work out with a trainer in Georgia.
There is hypocrisy in college athletics? You are kidding me. Your arguments don't make sense especially in a court of law. 'Everyone else does it' and 'but he did it first' may work with your mommy, but not your boss.
He's seeking $15k+?
He's seeking $15k+?
If he's seeking $15k, why even sue except out of spite? You can't help yourself, you can only inflict legal fees on the other party.
So Miller only has to show that he reasonably believed his wife was telling the truth. And his wife will support that.
Potentially, $15K x 2 = $30K = alleged payment(s) reimbursement. Oops, the suit seeks > $15K x 2. Regardless, the departed's logic quite frankly may potentially be impaired. Or, potentially his basic math skills may not be too strong. Or, he potentially may be chasing any form of revenge. Or, he potentially may have ignored possible legal advice regarding the potential for subpoenaed financial records. Or, potentially some other stuff thrown against a symbolic wall hoping something sticks or contributing to the preceding hybrid possibilities.Miller's wife is being sued too.
Potentially, $15K x 2 = $30K = alleged payment(s) reimbursement. Oops, the suit seeks > $15K x 2. Regardless, the departed's logic quite frankly may potentially be impaired. Or, potentially his basic math skills may not be too strong. Or, he potentially may be chasing any form of revenge. Or, he potentially may have ignored possible legal advice regarding the potential for subpoenaed financial records. Or, potentially some other stuff thrown against a symbolic wall hoping something sticks or contributing to the preceding hybrid possibilities.
Potentially, $15K x 2 = $30K = alleged payment(s) reimbursement. Oops, the suit seeks > $15K x 2. Regardless, the departed's logic quite frankly may potentially be impaired. Or, potentially his basic math skills may not be too strong. Or, he potentially may be chasing any form of revenge. Or, he potentially may have ignored possible legal advice regarding the potential for subpoenaed financial records. Or, potentially some other stuff thrown against a symbolic wall hoping something sticks or contributing to the preceding hybrid possibilities.
Standard lawsuit language, either less than or greater than 15K. Does not mean more than that.
So looks like this is about this part of Miller's testimon
“She articulated to my wife that Kevin provided her with somewhere in the neighborhood, I think, of $30,000 to make the move … and you know with that she was indebted to him, and she would be able to move into an apartment,” Miller told the NCAA’s Assistant Director of Enforcement Russell Register during a November interview in the New London offices of Miller's attorney, Tony Coric.
If one leaps to presume any potential payments were made directly by KO, that may not be a good presumption even with the departed's seeminig examples of potential vacuous logic. But, generously presuming any possible direct payments by the departed existed: Lease agreement? Potentially traceable. Car payment? Potentially traceable. Any bank deposits foolishly exceeding $10K? Easily documented by recipient financial institution. Living expenses, clothing budget, etc. Less so ... Garrett's possible tax returns? Hmmm ...If KO provided Shonn Miller’s mother with $30,000 wouldn’t that be easily traced? Unless he gave her gold bullion this is an easy one right?
Ya thinkIt's a pleading to get them in front of a particular court. He could be looking for $10mm, but you'd still say greater than $15k in the complaint.
I would be interested in a timeline of when the alleged 30k payment happened and when KO's divorce was announced.Miller was a nice player, but 30k nice??,, not even close.
Seriously. Had anyone heard her name in any of this until now?I get why KO would seek damages, but wtf reasoning does Shonn's mother have to be involved? What damages did she incur as a result of allegedly getting $30k? Good luck, lady. Just being used as a pawn by KO's crack-legal team.
or maybe miller invented the story and ko should get his name cleared. i know - crazy.
How does one do this? It's simply a he said/she said though, no?