but it was new newsno, it's called move along children. Everyone knows the entire Ollie situation is FUBAR. There is no reason to keep creating new threads every week, especially whennothing of value comes from it.
"but it was new news
that's just factually incorrect here"
a new spin maybe , "he said, she said"
Because this is a UConn basketball forum, did you get lost?Seriously, why are these threads still being created and posted??
exactly, it's on espn, does it really need to be constantly regurgitated here with nothing factual added??
Here's what you do to get those millions:Gotta remember, very few of us wouldn’t do whatever it took to get those millions. It is a bad situation for KO. It isn’t easy to walk away from all that money. I am sure KO thinks he did a good job, even if we don’t. He also won a national title, that warrants some respect. I’d like them to settle and give him some money, but that’s just one man’s opinion.
Ah, this BS again. Glenn Miller is a "rat" for reporting NCAA violations that he was CONTRACTUALLY and ETHICALLY required to report. Unreal.And LOL at the idea he should keep Calhoun out if it. Calhoun employs the rat. But Ollie is supposed to play nice.
Ah, this BS again. Glenn Miller is a "rat" for reporting NCAA violations that he was CONTRACTUALLY and ETHICALLY required to report. Unreal.
Sad just plain sad! It will extremely hard to come back from this one now. Years would have passed, he would have been welcomed back, but after this, not sure how you come back.. My guess is this was the final nail in Ollie’s coffin
Good lord, what a bunch of malarkey. Did Diaco violate NCAA rules ? If not, then the two situations are different. Did Calhoun have specific "zero tolerance" language in his contract about NCAA violations ? If not, then the two situations are different.Wasn’t Miller already gone when he went rat?
I’m not so much defending Ollie - this is just what happens to a broke athletic department.
Everywhere else they just pay him to go away - hell they paid DIACO to go away.
Calhoun got away with worse and Diaco got paid.
Ollie they used a rat to try to fire him with cause - we know it’s because they have no money - but the white guys got treated differently - debating that just shows a bias.
Good lord, what a bunch of malarkey. Did Diaco violate NCAA rules ? If not, then the two situations are different. Did Calhoun have specific "zero tolerance" language in his contract about NCAA violations ? If not, then the two situations are different.
I mean, seriously, this is just idiotic, frankly. UConn didn't have anything by which to fire Diaco FOR CAUSE. That's the difference. Oh, and he's white. Irrelevant.
Calhoun was a hall of fame coach with 50 years of coaching success and three (and a half) national championships. No, they were not going to fire THAT GUY for NCAA violations that, regardless of the narrative of how severe they were, were under his purview, but not actually committed BY Calhoun himself. The violations under Ollie were, in some cases, committed BY Kevin Ollie himself, and then he turned around and lied to the NCAA about it.
Knowing that there are known distinctions between cases precludes claiming, speciously, that the difference must be race. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
Pretending it isn't is intellectually dishonest, and that's being generous.