Official Bracket Thread | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Official Bracket Thread

I realize the women's tourney always does wacky things but #1 should match up with the worst 2nd seed. So a team from the "toughest" conference, which BTW they have won FOUR years in a row is the worst #2 ???
Not too far off -- the last AP poll as South Carolina as #7, or the 2nd worst of the 2 seeds.
 
I don't know who is worse.

All I know is we beat South Carolina by 25 and Texas by 2. Those were only the 2 options for Albany.
 
Looking at power rankings

Massey has #1, #8 SC, #10 FSU, #15 Ga, #23 Duke, #19 USF, #28 Cal, #36 Miami, #48 Quinn, #39 UVa, #42 Buffalo
 
Ohio State vs Oregon? Both may score in the 100s.

If it comes to pass, I would expect Oregon vs. Notre Dame to be high scoring as well.

Some ND folks were hoping for a 2-seed opposite Miss St. Personally, I wanted the #1 in Spokane opposite Oregon because I think that would be an extremely entertaining game.

I think Muffet is going to have some sleepless nights trying to figure out how to defend Oregon's offense.
 
#1 overall seed in the tournament has 7 teams ranked #23 or higher. You think that is a reward?
One bracket should get 7 ranked teams as 4 regions x 6 ranked teams = 24 so a 7th ranked team must get assigned somewhere.
 
.-.
How do you place the team with the best attendance in an already sold out Regional? Not sure what SC has done to the NCAA but it is clear they don't like us, especially after send us west the past 3 years and now placing us agaisnt the #1 team.

Attendance does not matter.
 
Stanford vs. Gonzaga have met quite a few times over the years. GU beat them in Maples Pavilion last season.
 
Not questioning the #2 seed. We have 7 top 25 teams in our bracket! 7
There are 25 top 25 teams, 4 brackets - three brackets get 6 each, one gets 7, in particular the bottom 7 (24 & 25). Seems fair to me.
 
One bracket should get 7 ranked teams as 4 regions x 6 ranked teams = 24 so a 7th ranked team must get assigned somewhere.

I understand that but it should not be the overall #1 seed.
 
.-.
There are 25 top 25 teams, 4 brackets - three brackets get 6 each, one gets 7, in particular the bottom 7 (24 & 25). Seems fair to me.

So you think the #1 overall seed should get the most Top 25 teams in their bracket? That makes zero sense.
 
So if UConn makes it to the Final 4 - would they play Norte Dames/Oregon’s region?
 
Yeah, mid majors don't deserve to be ranked :rolleyes:

When your strength of schedule is 258 (Belmont) or 259 (Mercer), yeah you probably don't.

That's not a criticism of their scheduling, which is probably fine compared to their peers. But let's compare apples to apples.
 
.-.
I realize the women's tourney always does wacky things but #1 should match up with the worst 2nd seed. So a team from the "toughest" conference, which BTW they have won FOUR years in a row is the worst #2 ???

SC was clearly the #7 team. They can't be paired with the #2 team (Miss St), so they were matched with the #1. Not a huge surprise.
 
.-.
USF is a 6 seed, they have to beat the 3 then the 2 to get to the 1 and that’s not happening.
Then why have a tournament???:rolleyes:
So good to see so many posters on here that know how everything is going to work out...Head bang
 
If it comes to pass, I would expect Oregon vs. Notre Dame to be high scoring as well.

Some ND folks were hoping for a 2-seed opposite Miss St. Personally, I wanted the #1 in Spokane opposite Oregon because I think that would be an extremely entertaining game.

I think Muffet is going to have some sleepless nights trying to figure out how to defend Oregon's offense.
I just want to see NO MORE INJURIES for ND in the tournament! I like their draw.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,350
Messages
4,566,553
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom