It just goes to show that a team's season doesn't matter but their location does!!!The chances of them meeting is extremely unlikely.
USF gets to play its opening rounds just a few hours away in Tallahassee. The committee should avoid that, just because they might face UConn in the FOURTH ROUND ?
I'm not entirely well-versed in Bracketology, if you will, but would anyone be willing to explain to me how a team like Cal ends up in the Albany bracket, and why the committee seems allergic to placing USF in a bracket that's not ours?
HUH
Not questioning the #2 seed. We have 7 top 25 teams in our bracket! 7
Thank you for this. I genuinely didn't understand, but it makes sense.There can only be 2 teams from the same conference in any bracket (unless the conf has >8 teams), so some PAC teams are going to end up in every region.
Folks have complained about USF being in UConn's bracket for years, and they STILL HAVENT PLAYED. This is much ado about nothing.
who cares? we don't have to play them all.Not questioning the #2 seed. We have 7 top 25 teams in our bracket! 7
#1 overall seed in the tournament has 7 teams ranked #23 or higher. You think that is a reward?
Rankings in polls aren't the same as the seedings. Anyway 25 ranked teams, 4 regions, so each region would have approximately 6 ranked teams +/- a little right?
So South Carolina is the lowest 2???