Do you guys really disagree that the bottom of the AAC is horrible?
What do you mean by the bottom?
UCF, Rutgers, USF and Temple?
UCF has a great player in Sykes and not much else, so they are likely as bad as your bad teams.
USF had a hurt player in Collinsbut the rest of the team was back, same team that beat Georgetown and UConn last year.
Rutgers still has Mack, Jack and Seagears. Last year those same players beat Pitt, St. John's, Seton Hall 2x, and DePaul. Granted, that's not very good, but it still means they were a bottom of the BE team who took a few scalps--not total pushovers.
Temple had a bad year but still played some teams tough.
These teams were pushed around in the American, but let's not pretend that DePaul, Butler, and Seton Hall are any better. They are not. You guys have 3 bottom dwellers whereas the American has 4.