- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 28,623
- Reaction Score
- 41,525
If I can't continue to disparage UCF at will, I'm not sure I can favor the move.
UCF invented space travel and has a Hotel Night Management Major.
It’s a quality institution.
If I can't continue to disparage UCF at will, I'm not sure I can favor the move.
UCF invented space travel and has a Hotel Night Management Major.
It’s a quality institution.
And the internetUConn invented time travel!
That was Al GoreAnd the internet
He liedThat was Al Gore
Yes, but after he invented it he put it in a lock box...That was Al Gore
Discussion of Berry Tramel's article. Tramel is against Memphis and UConn being added to the Big 12.
A few points. 1. Tramel is an OU guy, famously opposed expansion with any non football powers or schools outside the region. 2. His P5 add math is correct, except that there are reliable reports that ESPN/FOX would treat UConn as a P5. So UConn wouldn't dilute the payout if added. Tramel doesn't want to bother to get that right because he hates the idea of a New England school in the conference.Link to the Tramel’s article from Saturday: Does Memphis make much sense for Big 12 expansion. No, not really. Not much at all.
A few points. 1. Tramel is an OU guy, famously opposed expansion with any non football powers or schools outside the region. 2. His P5 add math is correct, except that there are reliable reports that ESPN/FOX would treat UConn as a P5. So UConn wouldn't dilute the payout if added. Tramel doesn't want to bother to get that right because he hates the idea of a New England school in the conference.
He just doesn’t like the northeast tbh.Link to the Tramel’s article from Saturday: Does Memphis make much sense for Big 12 expansion. No, not really. Not much at all.
It’s a Memphis focused article but he can’t help showing his usual UConn animus.
If there is any truth to Gonzaga even being remotely considered then we need to concede the possibility (and maybe probability) that all this UConn smoke is to add us to the Big XII for basketball only. If we were so valuable and considered "P5" by the networks, we would have had an offer already - and probably a long time ago and certainly ahead of the most recent G5 call ups and/or future call ups like SDST and SMU.
The reality is as much as Mora breathed some life into our football program, we are still a very long way from adding much to the equation. We all know our basketball is blue blood level but there is only so much basketball adds so I could see some kind of special basketball only deal along with Gonzaga where in our case it maybe includes a football scheduling tie in agreement.
I know this place would go crazy if this was the case but I can't help thinking that is what is actually happening behind the scenes...
Hoping only Colorado jumps. If 2 jump it might set off a stampede out the PAC. Colorado can be replaced with SDSU. Everyone wins.This is easy. The Big 12 will pair us with 1 or 3 Pac-12 schools. If 2 or 4 jump, we are toast.
That's the most ideal outcome. We don't want the PAC-12 to fall right now because B1G will wait before taking Oregon, Washington, Cal, and Stanford.Hoping only Colorado jumps. If 2 jump it might set off a stampede out the PAC. Colorado can be replaced with SDSU. Everyone wins.
Are you talking about the July 1 date? That date applies to SDSU, but I'm not seeing how it applies to the PAC 12. The PAC 12 is letting SDSU twist in the wind, regardless of the July 1 date. I don't understand why people say that things are going to start happening soon.we are tweaking out a little over the silence and the what seems like an eternity in the making PAC12 deal. The deal either is or isn't going to happen and there are deadlines so things are going to start moving soon.
Are you talking about the July 1 date? That date applies to SDSU, but I'm not seeing how it applies to the PAC 12. The PAC 12 is letting SDSU twist in the wind, regardless of the July 1 date. I don't understand why people say that things are going to start happening soon.
The more important pressure will come from these institutions who want to start budget work for the year after next. While these contracts account for only small part of their budgets, I know they would like to have an idea of those projections sooner rather than later.Are you talking about the July 1 date? That date applies to SDSU, but I'm not seeing how it applies to the PAC 12. The PAC 12 is letting SDSU twist in the wind, regardless of the July 1 date. I don't understand why people say that things are going to start happening soon.