- Joined
- Jan 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,351
- Reaction Score
- 5,741
What will this trend mean for UConn. Will we be able to get into the ACC or B10 more easily if others leave?
Hard to say, though I’d imagine so. But, as I often say, since we currently are on the outside looking in, change is our ally.What will this trend mean for UConn. Will we be able to get into the ACC or B10 more easily if others leave?
nope, i agree with youThis would be of no interest to me. I’d rather watch the NFL. Am I in the minority?
Do you have a Cliff Notes version with comments in the columns? It's over my head.USC to B1G ? UGH
The handbasket is being woven for football's vehicle to it's next destination.
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Do you have a Cliff Notes version with comments in the columns? It's over my head.
I am, over 70% Irish. I'm part Kerry and part Cavan. But i'm also a math guy, so my reading comprehension isn't the greatest. ☘ahh...you literal plod. Not blessed by the blood of the Irish, are yee?
Not even remotelyi haven't really been following - are these guys legit/often right or what
The interesting thing to me has been Brian Kelly’s comments that we are moving toward a system of professional teams associated with universities. The most Interesting thing was that he said “ the players might not like some of the things that come with professional athletics like being cut or being traded.” Imagine being at Michigan and in mid-season finding yourself traded to Mississippi State!
Actually I think we are headed toward such a model but it ultimately won’t succeed.
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
Sourced info (aka a real source, not fake BTM): Big Ten TV deal likely to be announced on July 26th. ESPN/ABC, CBS and NBC are still going after 40 % of the contract. ESPN is trending to not being in the contract. More.....
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
The dollar value of the contract is expected to be $1.2 Billion. The latest on how many protected rivalries for no divisions is 4. I know I've said 2 before, but this just puts 2 on top 2. Changes nothing, really. Amazon will not be in the TV contract.
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
With the Big Ten TV contract highly likely to be FOX 11amCT, CBS 230 pm CT, FS1 weekly game, NBC 630ct, BTN game, that is 5 out of 7 weekly conference games. Like I said the other day, there simply isn't enough content to cover FOX, CBS, NBC, FS1, BTN with 14 schools.
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
and you also have NBC's Peacock streaming a weekly game. With the Pac 12 TV valued expected to be half of the Big Ten, FOX will be sending Washington, Oregon, USC, UCLA (maybe others) to the Big Ten. Not a complete merger, but pretty damn close.
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
July 26th is said to be the day the Big Ten announces their new TV deal. Not saying things wouldn't leak before through the Sports Business Journal, but the actual release on that day.
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
Thus, to recap the Big Ten TV deal info - no Amazon, Peakcock to stream 1 weekly game, likely 4 protected rivals, CBS afternoon, NBC night, FOX big game, FS1, BTN. Pac 12 schools to join the Big Ten. Some will say this is ending up as a P2, NO!. It's a new division coming.
Xander Peters ♂️♂️ @HipXander · 4h
Replying to @Genetics56
So Big Ten National Conference kinda new conference? What would you imagine the SEC counters with when/if this all goes down? Notre Dame and then raid the ACC (so Clemson or FSU or Miami or UNC) to get to 20?
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
A bunch of the ACC schools.
college football fan@Genetics56 · 4h
Football only for the pac schools
Greg Flugaur@flugempire · 2h
Remember Oct - 2021
Q: “….From your viewpoint, what do you see the role of basketball when it comes to potential realignment…What role does basketball play in some of those decisions?”
Kevin Warren:
“Basketball plays an important role.”
Part 1
Greg Flugaur@flugempire · 2h
Replying to @flugempire
Kevin Warren:
“But I think from a basketball standpoint, that is a big component from kind of conference structure, realignment standpoint, is the importance of college basketball.
Part 2
Greg Flugaur@flugempire · 1h
If the miles between USC, Oregon, Washington, +1 vs the rest of Big Ten schools is too much to overcome for PAC schools to involve their revenue generating Basketball programs in joining the Big Ten than B1G expansion with Pacific Coast schools will not happen.
Part 3
Greg Flugaur@flugempire · 1h
Replying to @Expansion_Crush
I’m not implying PAC schools are refusing to have their Basketball programs be part of Big Ten…I’m just saying without those programs included it’s not happening.
If expansion happens it won’t be Football only add-ons.
All revenue creating sports would be involved.
Greg Flugaur@flugempire · 1h
Big Ten might become national conference with addition of 2-4 top PAC brands, but it won’t be a conference with more schools in West than Eastern Timezone. It’s just not where the value is and it’s not what Ohio St, Michigan would care to do.
Valuation might work with top 4.
Murr@MurrDCU · 1h
Would this be all sports or just a few money making sports?
Greg Flugaur@flugempire · 1h
As many sports as possible…but the point of the tweets is Basketball needs to be involved. If not, no deal. Just won’t happen.