Non-Key Tweets | Page 1054 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

I'm not sold on the transfer portal. I believe there is a huge difference between the average student and student-athletes. The average student is paying to go to school so he can change his mind at any time. The studend-athlete is receiving a scholarship to play a game. There should or could be an understanding. "We will offer you a 4 year scholarship if you commit to play here for 4 years." And then yes, there will be gaurdrails and clauses to allow a player to transfer. No one will care if you or I transfer. Everyone will care if a Stephon Castle transfers.
Yeah, I mean that's a valid point and honestly a perspective I hadn't considered. What of the general student body on scholarship, though? I think we agree, there should be more guardrails in place than what we have currently.
 
Bowl Ratings were some of the highest ever seen, in some cases the highest.

People predicted that bowls would be degraded due to the playoffs. Actually it was the opposite that occurred.
I love college football, so I'll watch just about anything. That said I feel that there were some interesting matchups outside of the playoff that drew viewership this year. Alabama v. Michigan is a good example. I also feel like the interest generated by the playoff did not diminish the interest in the rest of the games, but actually drew more viewers in. A rising tide lifting all boats to turn a phrase.
 
Less games to bet on is not the right approach. Betting creates a lot of interest. How about extra payouts to each team‘s players, more to the winning team obviously. Cap the number of players on each team who can be paid. The bigger the bowl, the bigger the payouts. Why the Feck not at this point.
 
I'm pretty much done with any FB but UConn football. But I love going to bowl games. I just had a blast in Boston. Even better, my partner loves going to them as well. Fans of bowl teams know what the game is all about, they don't worry about "importance". Especially in this case, it was a reward for a good season.
 
I love college football, so I'll watch just about anything. That said I feel that there were some interesting matchups outside of the playoff that drew viewership this year. Alabama v. Michigan is a good example. I also feel like the interest generated by the playoff did not diminish the interest in the rest of the games, but actually drew more viewers in. A rising tide lifting all boats to turn a phrase.

2M people watched our game on a Saturday morning. That ought to tell anyone why we still have these games.
 
Less games to bet on is not the right approach. Betting creates a lot of interest. How about extra payouts to each team‘s players, more to the winning team obviously. Cap the number of players on each team who can be paid. The bigger the bowl, the bigger the payouts. Why the Feck not at this point.
I want to disagree with this, but I don't.
 
I'm not here to troll. I just don't wear UConn tinted glasses and offer an outside, honest, perspective that some here seem to respect and others don't. I've been nothing but honest about my positions with you. I'm here, as I've said numerous times, to discuss realignment because this is the best page still discussing it. Some of your members have been antagonistic, unnecessarily. Hardly my fault.
 
I'm not here to troll. I just don't wear UConn tinted glasses and offer an outside, honest, perspective that some here seem to respect and others don't. I've been nothing but honest about my positions with you. I'm here, as I've said numerous times, to discuss realignment because this is the best page still discussing it. Some of your members have been antagonistic, unnecessarily. Hardly my fault.

It was not an invitation to chat.

Go away.
 
For trying to have a conversation? Lol, so much for such a "chill" fanbase. I've been nothing but respectful and honest. Some of you have shown your colors, however.
Called it!

(Not that it was particularly surprising.)
 
Less games to bet on is not the right approach. Betting creates a lot of interest. How about extra payouts to each team‘s players, more to the winning team obviously. Cap the number of players on each team who can be paid. The bigger the bowl, the bigger the payouts. Why the Feck not at this point.
Solving a problem that doesn't exist... as im not even sure what you're trying to solve
 
You insult and then want to play the nice guy. You can't have both
Who have I "insulted" that hasn't unnecessarily attacked me first? Hm? I've tried staying on topic and I would love to get back on it now, but don't play the victim. Only thing I'm guilty of around here is not being a UConn fan, and I've been open and honest about that. All I've done is try to offer an outside perspective and discuss a topic I find interesting with you guys. That's it. But from jump, a small segment of posters have done absolutely nothing but harass and harangue despite my best efforts to stay on topic, to remain respectful and recognize I'm in your house. Don't pretend I've been given a fair shake around here. Even when I've been positive about UConn, sharing my belief that they're solidly in when the dust settles, explaining my rationale as to why I feel that way and why I've felt differently in the past, you and said small handful decided to mock the view and focus on trying to figure out what team I cheer for. So don't... Don't try and play some victim. You get the respect you give, and I've tried very hard to be respectful, be positive, stay on topic, and in return some of you have been downright boorish.
 
Save the Bowls and get the best players to play in the bowls vs. sitting out to enter the portal
Used to be, you'd watch a bowl and if someone entered the draft, you could still kind of get a feel for how your team would look the coming season. Now, it's untelling who will or won't be back.
 
xt8tz.jpg
 

Online statistics

Members online
202
Guests online
1,339
Total visitors
1,541

Forum statistics

Threads
163,963
Messages
4,376,819
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom