New PAC-12 Forming | Page 28 | The Boneyard

New PAC-12 Forming

Publicly saying no through the Courant is kind of strange no? Why even say anything?
They don’t have to comment on it all. This way they can get it out there that we turned them down. Not the other way around. It’s likely targeted message at the Big 12 and the ACC schools more than anything else
 
Or the offered an SMU type deal.
That’s also possible that it was a crap deal. Whatever it was, it wasn’t worth it for us since our goal is full time in one of the power conferences
 

IMG_4018.jpeg
 
I hope that means we got some good news from the B12
I hope this means we are still talking to the B12. If B12 doesn't want UConn football until 2031, what's the point not joining the PAC-12 as a football only until then?

There are definite benefits joining the conference and get to play some opponents regularly. Maybe the cost of buying out games already scheduled for the next few years outweigh the cost of joining just for a few years.
 
.-.
"Though the possibility of UConn joining the Pac-12 as a football-only complement was explored last week, this will not happen. UConn sources, requesting anonymity, told The Courant the university doesn’t consider this the right fit at this time".

That's because they are still talking to the Big 12 (per Flugaur). Maybe things are getting closer.
 
I don’t think we need to do much parsing of the situation to understand why the flagship of a state where you can dip your toes in the Atlantic Ocean might not consider the Pacific Athletic Conference to be the ‘best fit.’
 
I don’t think we need to do much parsing of the situation to understand why the flagship of a state where you can dip your toes in the Atlantic Ocean might not consider the Pacific Athletic Conference to be the ‘best fit.’

It's 4 flights a year for the football team.

Only way they turned this down is if the terms were awful. Not buying "fit" in of itself as a valid excuse.
 
If there isn't another announcement sometime this month about positive progress in accepting an invite into a conference, then this news of turning down a possible move to the PAC is mindblowingly stupid. I was a UConn BBall fan before becoming a general UConn sports fan, and I would leave the BE in a heartbeat if it meant our survival. This news is nucking futs.
 
It's 4 flights a year for the football team.

Only way they turned this down is if the terms were awful. Not buying "fit" in of itself as a valid
If you think the logistics here is just "four flights", you have no idea how a football program operates.
 
Also this:

Sacramento State's Pac-12 committee raises $35 million for NIL funds

Sacramento State is ramping up its quest to land an invite to the Pac-12 Conference.

Five days ago, the school announced plans for a new multi-use football stadium. The Sac12 executive committee announced Monday afternoon it has sourced $35 million in NIL funds from local businesses, community leaders and a local tribe in the last 24 hours.

The committee announced its goal is to raise a $50 million NIL war chest. The Sac12 executive group launched shortly after the Pac-12 added Boise State, Fresno State, San Diego State, and Colorado State.



Nobody actually believes this is true.
 
.-.

It would be interesting to know whether a deal was expressly on the table and what it terms were. if it was the same offer as other teams hinted at, which is pretty much join us and will keep all the money, it was wise to turn down.

On the other hand, if we had an informal understanding with the big 12, as the Flug hinted at, then it would make no sense to involve ourselves with the PAC-2.
Think About It GIF by Identity
 
I don’t think we need to do much parsing of the situation to understand why the flagship of a state where you can dip your toes in the Atlantic Ocean might not consider the Pacific Athletic Conference to be the ‘best fit.’
Tell Cal that
 
The 2 most logical reasons for us turning the PAC12 down for football only are:

1 - the deal sucked (either from a money, exposure, scheduling perspective or all of the above)

2 - we are more advanced in our discussions with the Big12 (or ACC) than we are aware of.

Let's hope it's the latter...
 
.-.
It would be interesting to know whether a deal was expressly on the table and what it terms were. if it was the same offer as other teams hinted at, which is pretty much join us and will keep all the money, it was wise to turn down.

On the other hand, if we had an informal understanding with the big 12, as the Flug hinted at, then it would make no sense to involve ourselves with the PAC-2.
Think About It GIF by Identity
The 2 most logical reasons for us turning the PAC12 down for football only are:

1 - the deal sucked (either from a money, exposure, scheduling perspective or all of the above)

2 - we are more advanced in our discussions with the Big12 (or ACC) than we are aware of.

Let's hope it's the latter...
My delusional mind believes it’s the latter. There’s no hope for the weary
 
The other possibility is the wanted a long term commitment which would hav precluded us fron taking another deal. There is also the pr component. If the PAC relaunch had gone smoothly, it is different than the cluster that it has been. No guarantee they will even get to the minimum # of members. And I’m not sure we want to travel to the west coast to play Sacramento State.
 
The other possibility is the wanted a long term commitment which would hav precluded us fron taking another deal. There is also the pr component. If the PAC relaunch had gone smoothly, it is different than the cluster that it has been. No guarantee they will even get to the minimum # of members. And I’m not sure we want to travel to the west coast to play Sacramento State.
Your first sentence would seem to go in the "crappy deal" column.
 
I Think the Pac-12 Circles Back & Goes After Teams in the American Conference | Brett McMurphy

He thinks the Pac will go after Memphis again.


I'll have to view it later.

I was thinking a few AAC programs said no to PAC and Texas St of the Sun Belt said no to the MWC. It really seems PAC and MWC should just merge after all this. Not sure any programs from the AAC or Sun Belt would want to travel to west coast for many of their games.

McMurphy claiming that everyone said he was wrong about Gonzaga. People said there was no deal in place between PAC and Zags but agreed that it was possible very soon.
 
.-.
I'll have to view it later.

I was thinking a few AAC programs said no to PAC and Texas St of the Sun Belt said no to the MWC. It really seems PAC and MWC should just merge after all this. Not sure any programs from the AAC or Sun Belt would want to travel to west coast for many of their games.

McMurphy claiming that everyone said he was wrong about Gonzaga. People said there was no deal in place between PAC and Zags but agreed that it was possible very soon.
At the end, McMurphy says that the Big 12 is not sorry that they didn't get the Zags and they don't want Gonzaga or UConn right now, but that could change, who knows.
 
Now that I've settled a bit from today's CR whirlwind, I came across this week old Reddit post as it related to the UConn-Pac rumor:

"Hartford Connecticut is closer to most of the Pac schools than Hawaii. So, why the hell not."

It's a moot point now, but somehow Hawaii made their football trips to the MWC work without going completely bankrupt. Guess we shouldn't expect any home and away football agreements with this new PAC based on today's headlines.
 
The MWC could add Hawaii as an all-sports member (they are currently football only). If Hawaii was an all-sports member, the MWC would have the minimum number of full members needed to be a conference.

If Texas State turned down the MWC, I wonder how serious the Texas State/PAC 12 conversations are right now?
 
The 2 most logical reasons for us turning the PAC12 down for football only are:

1 - the deal sucked (either from a money, exposure, scheduling perspective or all of the above)

2 - we are more advanced in our discussions with the Big12 (or ACC) than we are aware of.

Let's hope it's the latter...
It could be both. If there was an offer for football only membership, I would really like to know what the terms were as usual. It seems like the PAC is out there trying to recruit programs without knowing exactly what it will be able to offer financially. I think many are overestimating the media revenue.
 
If you think the logistics here is just "four flights", you have no idea how a football program operates.

Expand upon that. What else does it entail?

I don't think it affects our recruiting footprint, we're still going to play 8 games a year in our traditional region.

Games at weird times? SUNJ plays USC at 11pm est in a few weeks.

We'd get an actual schedule, a consistent schedule, and access to the CFP. I don't see a downside, unless there is a long GOR.
 
The MWC could add Hawaii as an all-sports member (they are currently football only). If Hawaii was an all-sports member, the MWC would have the minimum number of full members needed to be a conference.

If Texas State turned down the MWC, I wonder how serious the Texas State/PAC 12 conversations are right now?
The MWC is not adding Hawaii. Travel is awful.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,378
Messages
4,569,112
Members
10,474
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom